[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":510},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$feh719YvIhiGaYMHghUTs__daF-eenpyYWmU-4HN1NRE":3,"$fifB-6kOuqTLbVAniwDp4-1mDz0Xufu8r-UhmPGHdtO8":49},[4,14,21,29,36,43],{"id":5,"name":6,"session_type":7,"committee_name":6,"held_on":8,"assembly_id":9,"source_url":10,"summary":11,"decisions":12,"speech_count":13},231,"令和７年環境まちづくり委員会  本文","committee","2025-04-25",2,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.chiyoda.tokyo.dbsr.jp\u002F926254?Template=document&Id=10265#one","神田警察通りII期工事などの道路整備事業を中心に、工事の透明性、住民との合意形成、契約変更の詳細、および都市再開発事業の進捗状況について議論された。あわせて災害危険区域の指定方針についても質問が出された。",[],67,{"id":15,"name":16,"session_type":7,"committee_name":16,"held_on":8,"assembly_id":9,"source_url":17,"summary":18,"decisions":19,"speech_count":20},226,"令和７年文教福祉委員会  本文","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.chiyoda.tokyo.dbsr.jp\u002F616991?Template=document&Id=10203#one","令和7年度の文教福祉委員会初会合。子ども部と保健福祉部から計5件の報告事項について説明を受け、委員から生徒交流プログラムの参加費や職場体験事業の受け入れ拡大、ワクチン接種体制、障害児通所・宿泊支援事業など多岐にわたる質問が出された。",[],85,{"id":22,"name":23,"session_type":7,"committee_name":23,"held_on":8,"assembly_id":9,"source_url":24,"summary":25,"decisions":26,"speech_count":28},221,"令和７年企画総務委員会  本文","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.chiyoda.tokyo.dbsr.jp\u002F126901?Template=document&Id=10227#one","企画総務委員会が開催され、人事異動の報告、戸籍管理や行政サービス提供、公有施設の活用・運営、駅前再開発、生涯学習施設、新スポーツセンター、財務情報の可視化など複数の行政課題について、委員からの質問や意見が交わされた。",[27],"理事者名簿案から「案」の文字を削除し正式名簿として承認",77,{"id":30,"name":6,"session_type":7,"committee_name":6,"held_on":31,"assembly_id":9,"source_url":32,"summary":33,"decisions":34,"speech_count":35},230,"2025-03-25","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.chiyoda.tokyo.dbsr.jp\u002F926254?Template=document&Id=10209#one","千代田区の住宅支援制度、警備員による住民トラブル事案、および神田警察通りの街路樹伐採・道路整備計画について、複数の委員から質問・指摘が相次いだ。高齢者向け住宅の抽選制度、居住支援家賃助成の適正性、警備会社の報告義務と行政対応、樹木診断基準とまちづくりプロセスなどが議論の焦点となった。",[],273,{"id":37,"name":16,"session_type":7,"committee_name":16,"held_on":31,"assembly_id":9,"source_url":38,"summary":39,"decisions":40,"speech_count":42},225,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.chiyoda.tokyo.dbsr.jp\u002F616991?Template=document&Id=10201#one","千代田区文教福祉委員会では、中高生への経済支援制度の創設と幼稚園の給食・預かり保育拡充について審議が行われました。また、学校の学期制変更、保健施設での感染症事例、社会福祉法人の合併など複数の報告事項について質疑が交わされました。",[41],"議案第17号『千代田区中高生世代応援手当条例』は賛成全員で可決した",174,{"id":44,"name":23,"session_type":7,"committee_name":23,"held_on":31,"assembly_id":9,"source_url":45,"summary":46,"decisions":47,"speech_count":48},220,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.chiyoda.tokyo.dbsr.jp\u002F126901?Template=document&Id=10225#one","千代田区の企画総務委員会で、路上喫煙の取り締まり強化を求める陳情の審査、町会活動の支援施策、観光事業、文化施設の整備計画など複数の議題について質疑と意見交換が行われました。各議題について委員から施策の内容や効果、今後の対応方法について多くの質問が出されました。",[],165,[50,92,114,134,156,177,200,223,246,267,287,306,326,345,369,388,408,423,438,458,475,493],{"member_id":51,"name":52,"party":53,"photo_url":54,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":56,"top_topics":57,"summary":58,"evidence":59,"fields":60,"field_years":86},43,"小枝　すみ子","ちよだの声","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fkoeda_sumiko.jpeg",null,645,[],"行政の情報公開・資料作成の不備を繰り返し指摘し、都市計画審議会の手続きや公共施設整備における意思決定プロセスの透明性を求める発言が多く記録されている。住民からの意見や陳情内容の詳細な把握、データの正確性、議会への事前協議を強調するスタンスが読み取れる。",[],{"bousai":61,"fukushi":65,"kenko":69,"machi":72,"kankyo":76,"keizai":80,"gyosei":81,"jinken":82,"kosodate":84,"sumai":85},[62,62,9,63,64],6,5,0,[66,63,67,68,64],11,3,8,[70,67,67,71,64],7,4,[73,74,75,74,64],31,33,24,[77,78,79,68,64],17,12,9,[70,63,79,78,64],[70,71,67,71,64],[83,9,83,67,64],1,[67,79,78,62,64],[83,71,67,79,64],[87,88,89,90,91],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":93,"name":94,"party":95,"photo_url":96,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":97,"top_topics":98,"summary":99,"evidence":100,"fields":101,"field_years":113},44,"えごし　雄一","公明党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fegoshi_yuuichi.jpg",127,[],"防災・福祉・教育など区の主要施策について、実施体制の詳細確認と運用上の課題抽出を中心とした質問が多く記録されている。住民への丁寧な説明、サービス利用者の声の吸い上げ、関係者間の情報連携といった「現場対応の質」を問う発言が顕著である。",[],{"bousai":102,"fukushi":103,"kenko":104,"machi":105,"kankyo":106,"sumai":107,"kosodate":108,"keizai":110,"gyosei":111,"jinken":112},[64,64,9,67,64],[64,64,63,67,64],[64,64,63,67,64],[64,64,67,67,64],[64,64,67,83,64],[64,83,9,9,64],[64,70,109,109,64],14,[64,9,83,64,64],[64,64,9,64,64],[64,64,83,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":115,"name":116,"party":95,"photo_url":117,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":118,"top_topics":119,"summary":120,"evidence":121,"fields":122,"field_years":133},45,"米田　かずや","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fyoneda_kazuya.jpeg",118,[],"行政制度や事業の運用面における具体的な実装・周知・フォローアップを繰り返し指摘する発言が多い。政策導入時の課題抽出、情報提供の充実、利用者・事業者への丁寧な説明、他区・他機関との比較検討を求める質疑が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":123,"fukushi":124,"kosodate":125,"kenko":126,"machi":127,"kankyo":128,"keizai":129,"gyosei":130,"jinken":131,"sumai":132},[64,83,9,83,64],[64,67,9,71,64],[64,9,9,67,64],[64,63,67,9,64],[64,83,83,62,64],[64,64,9,9,64],[64,9,62,79,64],[64,64,62,83,64],[64,64,83,9,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":135,"name":136,"party":137,"photo_url":138,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":139,"top_topics":140,"summary":141,"evidence":142,"fields":143,"field_years":155},41,"大坂　隆洋","千代田区議会 自由民主党","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Foosaka_takahiro.jpeg",157,[],"区の施策・事業の詳細な進捗状況や課題認識を確認する質問が多く、現状把握・将来計画・コスト効率性などを具体的に掘り下げる傾向が記録されている。DX推進、組織体制、施設整備など複数領域にわたって、実装段階での実効性や透明性確保を重視する指摘が続いている。",[],{"bousai":144,"fukushi":145,"kosodate":146,"machi":148,"kankyo":149,"keizai":150,"gyosei":151,"sumai":152,"kenko":153,"jinken":154},[64,83,83,9,64],[64,64,63,9,64],[83,64,147,67,64],15,[9,9,71,67,64],[9,64,9,67,64],[67,64,66,68,64],[63,70,78,83,64],[83,64,83,83,64],[83,64,71,83,64],[83,64,9,9,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":157,"name":158,"party":137,"photo_url":159,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":160,"top_topics":161,"summary":162,"evidence":163,"fields":164,"field_years":176},56,"小林　たかや","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fkobayashi_takaya.jpg",779,[],"委員会運営を統括する立場から、執行機関の答弁の責任者や手続きの明確化を求める発言が記録されている。また、政策の実行段階における具体的な課題（ボール遊び場の確保、落書き対策、組織横断的な事業対応など）について、担当部門に対して詳細な説明資料提出や実装方法の工夫を促す質問が多く見られる。",[],{"bousai":165,"fukushi":166,"kosodate":167,"machi":168,"kankyo":170,"keizai":171,"gyosei":172,"sumai":173,"jinken":174,"kenko":175},[83,64,70,83,64],[64,64,67,67,64],[83,64,62,9,64],[67,64,169,63,64],10,[9,64,70,9,64],[64,64,70,63,64],[64,67,70,67,64],[64,67,83,9,64],[64,64,83,9,64],[9,64,9,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":178,"name":179,"party":137,"photo_url":180,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":181,"top_topics":182,"summary":183,"evidence":184,"fields":185,"field_years":199},49,"池田　とものり","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fikeda_tomonori.jpeg",409,[],"教育・子育て・福祉施策の詳細や運用面の課題について、具体的な質問を重ねる傾向が記録されている。制度設計時の想定外のケース、実装面での運用の差、関係者間の情報共有のあり方などを指摘し、改善や確認を求める発言が多く見られる。",[],{"machi":186,"kosodate":187,"keizai":190,"fukushi":191,"kankyo":192,"kenko":193,"bousai":195,"sumai":196,"gyosei":197,"jinken":198},[64,83,70,70,64],[64,109,188,189,64],26,38,[83,67,66,67,64],[83,66,66,109,64],[64,9,66,83,64],[83,194,169,63,64],20,[64,9,67,67,64],[64,9,64,9,64],[83,64,67,83,64],[83,64,67,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":201,"name":202,"party":137,"photo_url":203,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":204,"top_topics":205,"summary":206,"evidence":207,"fields":208,"field_years":222},40,"西岡　めぐみ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fnishioka_megumi.jpeg",995,[],"子ども・福祉政策に関する委員会審議で、制度設計の時間的な後手対応や行政における実務的課題への指摘が多く記録されている。また、保護者・現場視点での施設ニーズや事業成果の詳細把握、デジタル化推進に関する発言が繰り返し見られる。",[],{"fukushi":209,"kosodate":213,"kenko":215,"bousai":216,"machi":217,"keizai":218,"sumai":219,"kankyo":220,"gyosei":221},[83,210,211,212,64],18,25,19,[9,214,135,178,64],30,[9,212,194,109,64],[83,83,83,83,64],[83,83,67,67,64],[64,9,83,67,64],[83,83,64,67,64],[83,83,71,67,64],[83,71,64,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":224,"name":225,"party":226,"photo_url":227,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":228,"top_topics":229,"summary":230,"evidence":231,"fields":232,"field_years":245},50,"はやお　恭一","千代田区議会 自由民主党(副幹事長)","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fhayao_kyouichi.jpg",283,[],"都市再開発・行政計画の立案過程における手続的正確性と透明性を重視し、行政側の根拠提示や論理的一貫性を何度も確認する発言が記録されている。民間経営の観点から事業の経済性や採算性を検討対象とする傾向が見られる。",[],{"machi":233,"gyosei":236,"kankyo":237,"fukushi":238,"kosodate":239,"kenko":240,"sumai":241,"keizai":242,"jinken":243,"bousai":244},[64,234,109,235,64],16,28,[64,64,63,9,64],[64,70,70,68,64],[64,67,83,63,64],[64,169,67,67,64],[64,83,83,9,64],[64,67,67,83,64],[64,67,71,67,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":247,"name":248,"party":249,"photo_url":250,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":251,"top_topics":252,"summary":253,"evidence":254,"fields":255,"field_years":266},58,"桜井　ただし","千代田区議会自由民主党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fsakurai_tadasi.jpeg",260,[],"都市計画・開発事業を中心に区の事業推進と手続の適正性について質問・確認する発言が多い。事業計画の遵守と専門家委員会の知見を尊重する立場から、計画段階での合意形成と段階的な実現を重視する発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":256,"kosodate":257,"kenko":258,"machi":259,"kankyo":260,"keizai":261,"jinken":262,"sumai":263,"fukushi":264,"gyosei":265},[83,83,83,83,64],[64,9,9,67,64],[62,63,83,9,64],[64,109,70,62,64],[83,83,83,9,64],[64,64,9,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,67,83,62,64],[62,63,83,67,64],[71,71,83,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":268,"name":269,"party":249,"photo_url":270,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":271,"top_topics":272,"summary":273,"evidence":274,"fields":275,"field_years":286},52,"永田　壮一","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fnagata_souichi.jpeg",79,[],"都市開発や福祉施設、行政手続など多分野にわたる質問が記録されており、事業の収支や実現性、行政の事務処理体制を問う傾向が見られる。施策の効率性や具体的な数値根拠、対策の実装状況について詳細な説明を求める質問が多い。",[],{"bousai":276,"fukushi":277,"kosodate":278,"kenko":279,"machi":280,"kankyo":281,"keizai":282,"gyosei":283,"jinken":284,"sumai":285},[83,64,9,83,64],[83,64,67,9,64],[9,64,83,9,64],[83,64,83,83,64],[71,64,71,9,64],[71,64,64,67,64],[67,64,64,63,64],[9,67,64,83,64],[83,83,64,9,64],[9,64,64,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":288,"name":289,"party":249,"photo_url":290,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":271,"top_topics":291,"summary":292,"evidence":293,"fields":294,"field_years":305},51,"白川　司","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fshirakawa_tsukasa.jpg",[],"子育て・教育支援の充実や医療・福祉政策について質問が多く、施設・事業の費用対効果や実現可能性を具体的数値で問う傾向が見られる。また、中国製品の導入や性別分離教育など、センシティブな社会政策について独自の見解を述べる発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":295,"fukushi":296,"kosodate":297,"machi":298,"kankyo":299,"keizai":300,"sumai":301,"gyosei":302,"kenko":303,"jinken":304},[64,83,64,9,64],[64,64,63,63,64],[64,71,68,62,64],[64,9,71,63,64],[64,83,83,9,64],[64,64,83,67,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,83,62,83,64],[64,83,71,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":307,"name":308,"party":309,"photo_url":310,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":271,"top_topics":311,"summary":312,"evidence":313,"fields":314,"field_years":325},61,"富山　あゆみ","千代田区議会自由民主党議員団(経理責任者・幹事)","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Ftomiyama_ayumi.png",[],"障害者を含む社会的配慮が必要な層への支援制度や施設環境の詳細な確認・改善提案が記録されている。また、インクルーシブ教育やポータルサイト設計、バス・福祉施設の利用実態に基づいた質問が多く、当事者の意見反映の必要性を指摘する発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":315,"fukushi":316,"kosodate":317,"kenko":318,"machi":319,"kankyo":320,"keizai":321,"gyosei":322,"jinken":323,"sumai":324},[64,64,83,83,64],[64,63,9,79,64],[64,9,67,70,64],[64,83,83,62,64],[64,64,9,9,64],[64,64,9,9,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,64,9,64],[64,83,64,9,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":327,"name":328,"party":329,"photo_url":330,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":307,"top_topics":331,"summary":332,"evidence":333,"fields":334,"field_years":344},54,"田中　えりか","国民民主党","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Ftanaka_erika.jpg",[],"行政事業の情報公開・広報のあり方や、区民へのサービス提供における透明性と区民優遇に関する質問が記録に多く見られる。また、地域コミュニティや商店街振興、インバウンド対策と地元住民のバランスといった地域活性化の課題について、具体的な実施状況の確認と改善提案を行う発言が目立つ。",[],{"bousai":335,"fukushi":336,"kosodate":337,"machi":338,"kankyo":339,"keizai":340,"gyosei":341,"sumai":342,"jinken":343},[64,64,9,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,67,83,64],[64,64,64,67,64],[64,64,64,9,64],[64,64,62,67,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":346,"name":347,"party":348,"photo_url":349,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":350,"top_topics":351,"summary":352,"evidence":353,"fields":354,"field_years":368},46,"牛尾　こうじろう","日本共産党","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fusio_koujiro.jpg",432,[],"子育て・教育・福祉施策の具体的な運用実態を細かく質問する発言が多く記録されている。保育・学童・医療費助成などの施策について、対象者への周知方法、実際の支給・実施状況、職員体制の充実度など、制度設計から現場対応まで多段階にわたる確認を行う傾向が見られる。また、保育士や教員の負担軽減、障害児支援の人材配置、低所得世帯への負担軽減といった、弱い立場にある人々への支援強化を求める発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":355,"fukushi":356,"kosodate":357,"kenko":361,"machi":362,"kankyo":363,"jinken":364,"keizai":365,"sumai":366,"gyosei":367},[64,169,83,68,64],[64,68,212,234,64],[64,358,359,360,64],42,47,39,[64,79,234,78,64],[64,71,71,67,64],[64,9,62,83,64],[64,67,9,83,64],[64,234,210,70,64],[64,9,67,71,64],[64,63,63,71,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":358,"name":370,"party":371,"photo_url":372,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":373,"top_topics":374,"summary":375,"evidence":376,"fields":377,"field_years":387},"のざわ　哲夫","日本維新の会千代田議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fnozawa_tetsuo.png",139,[],"施設整備・予算管理・地域コミュニティに関する具体的な質問が記録されている。コスト効率性の検証、事業費の詳細確認、内部統制の強化、町会活動の支援といった実務的な視点からの指摘が多く、政策立案時に区民生活への直接的なプラスを明示するよう求める発言が繰り返されている。",[],{"bousai":378,"kosodate":379,"machi":380,"kankyo":381,"keizai":382,"sumai":383,"gyosei":384,"fukushi":385,"jinken":386},[64,64,67,71,64],[64,64,83,63,64],[64,64,9,63,64],[64,64,67,63,64],[64,64,9,66,64],[64,64,64,9,64],[64,64,67,83,64],[64,64,9,64,64],[64,64,67,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":389,"name":390,"party":391,"photo_url":392,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":268,"top_topics":393,"summary":394,"evidence":395,"fields":396,"field_years":407},60,"おのでら　亮","次世代・都民ファースト・立憲の会","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fonodera_ryou.jpg",[],"行政事業の事務費や委託費の削減可能性を繰り返し質問し、複数年にわたる類似事業の効率性改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。また、区立施設の利用料金設定や指定管理者の経営状況、教育施設の機能・特性に関する具体的な数字や比較検証を求める質問が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":397,"fukushi":398,"kosodate":399,"kenko":400,"machi":401,"keizai":402,"jinken":403,"sumai":404,"gyosei":405,"kankyo":406},[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,64,70,64],[64,9,71,68,64],[64,64,9,83,64],[64,64,9,67,64],[64,64,9,9,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,9,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[64,64,83,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":409,"name":410,"party":391,"photo_url":411,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":63,"top_topics":412,"summary":55,"evidence":413,"fields":414,"field_years":422},57,"ふかみ　貴子","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fhukami_takako.jpg",[],[],{"fukushi":415,"kosodate":416,"kenko":417,"kankyo":418,"keizai":419,"gyosei":420,"sumai":421},[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":424,"name":425,"party":391,"photo_url":426,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":327,"top_topics":427,"summary":428,"evidence":429,"fields":430,"field_years":437},53,"入山　たけひこ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Firiyama_takehiko.jpg",[],"区民生活や地域コミュニティに関わる具体的な施設運営・イベント企画の詳細について、数値や実施状況の確認質問が多く記録されている。また、従来からの町会活動と新住民・若年層の参加のバランス、地域連携による事業展開といった課題についての問い掛けが繰り返し表れている。",[],{"keizai":431,"sumai":432,"machi":433,"kosodate":434,"kankyo":435,"bousai":436},[64,64,9,71,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,67,67,64],[64,64,83,9,64],[64,64,64,83,64],[64,64,64,9,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":439,"name":440,"party":391,"photo_url":441,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":442,"top_topics":443,"summary":444,"evidence":445,"fields":446,"field_years":457},48,"小野　なりこ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fnariko_ono.jpeg",132,[],"地域課題の詳細な実態把握と段階的な施策改善を重視する発言が記録されている。町会支援、子育て支援、産業振興、公共施設活用など広範な分野で、既存事業の効果測定、関係者ヒアリング、制度設計の丁寧さを問う質疑が多い。",[],{"bousai":447,"fukushi":448,"kosodate":449,"kenko":450,"machi":451,"kankyo":452,"keizai":453,"sumai":454,"jinken":455,"gyosei":456},[64,83,83,83,64],[64,83,83,83,64],[64,63,71,67,64],[64,83,9,83,64],[64,83,83,9,64],[64,83,64,67,64],[64,67,109,71,64],[64,64,67,9,64],[64,64,9,83,64],[64,9,9,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":359,"name":459,"party":391,"photo_url":460,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":461,"top_topics":462,"summary":55,"evidence":463,"fields":464,"field_years":474},"岩佐　りょう子","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fiwasa_ryouko.jpeg",105,[],[],{"machi":465,"kankyo":466,"keizai":467,"bousai":468,"fukushi":469,"kosodate":470,"kenko":471,"sumai":472,"gyosei":473},[64,63,63,63,64],[64,83,9,9,64],[64,70,64,83,64],[64,83,64,9,64],[64,67,83,83,64],[64,68,64,64,64],[64,79,64,64,64],[64,83,64,64,64],[64,83,64,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":476,"name":477,"party":391,"photo_url":478,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":181,"top_topics":479,"summary":480,"evidence":481,"fields":482,"field_years":492},55,"岩田　かずひと","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fiwata_kazuhito.jpeg",[],"再開発・都市計画に関する案件で、行政手続の透明性・公正性について異議を唱える発言が記録されている。特に意見聴取の属性確認、利害関係者の混在、合意形成の時期やプロセスの適切性について、具体的な質問・指摘を繰り返す傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":483,"kosodate":484,"kenko":485,"machi":486,"keizai":487,"gyosei":488,"kankyo":489,"sumai":490,"fukushi":491},[9,83,9,83,64],[64,83,67,63,64],[83,9,83,71,64],[9,188,78,67,64],[71,9,64,9,64],[83,83,83,9,64],[67,70,9,9,64],[83,9,71,64,64],[9,67,83,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],{"member_id":494,"name":495,"party":391,"photo_url":496,"terms":55,"elected_at":55,"assembly_id":9,"role":55,"profile_url":55,"speech_count":497,"top_topics":498,"summary":499,"evidence":500,"fields":501,"field_years":509},59,"秋谷　こうき","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai-chiyoda-tokyo.jp\u002Fabout\u002Fimages\u002Fakiya_kouki.jpeg",142,[],"本会議の議長職務と一般質問での質疑が記録に残されている。子どもの論理的思考力・読解力の育成、公共施設の運用改善、工事工期短縮など、区民生活に関わる具体的課題について質問・提案する発言が記録されている。",[],{"machi":502,"kankyo":503,"gyosei":504,"fukushi":505,"kosodate":506,"kenko":507,"bousai":508},[64,83,67,71,64],[64,83,9,67,64],[64,64,9,9,64],[64,64,67,71,64],[64,67,9,67,64],[64,83,9,9,64],[64,83,9,64,64],[87,88,89,90,91],1789179104626]