[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":646},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fSMVaRt2_zR3MZKpPJhI_WeAh8LRYqq7OTJq3vPz5NT4":3},[4,58,84,117,143,167,187,209,228,248,273,295,316,337,359,383,404,425,445,465,485,505,526,546,566,585,605,625],{"member_id":5,"name":6,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":12,"top_topics":13,"summary":14,"evidence":15,"fields":16,"field_years":52},376,"ほづみゆうき","かがやき中央","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F46hodumi.jpg?202305",1,null,11,504,[],"行政サービスの実効性や運用面の課題を細かく指摘する発言が多く記録されている。制度設計や予算措置については、対象者が実際に利用可能か、周知が十分か、効果測定ができているかといった実装面での質問を繰り返しており、理想と現実のギャップを埋めることを重視する立場が読み取れる。",[],{"kosodate":17,"kenko":23,"bousai":27,"machi":30,"kankyo":35,"keizai":36,"gyosei":40,"sumai":43,"fukushi":47,"jinken":51},[18,19,20,21,22],0,27,83,59,21,[18,24,22,25,26],7,14,4,[18,26,28,29,26],24,9,[18,31,32,33,34],28,46,13,2,[18,29,25,22,24],[18,37,38,39,33],16,62,32,[18,41,39,42,25],8,31,[18,44,45,24,46],3,29,6,[18,48,49,28,50],5,40,10,[18,9,9,11,9],[53,54,55,56,57],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":59,"name":60,"party":7,"photo_url":61,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":62,"top_topics":63,"summary":64,"evidence":65,"fields":66,"field_years":83},354,"上田かずき","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F42ueda.jpg?202305",203,[],"日本維新の会所属の議員として、行政の効率性や予算の費用対効果を問う発言が多く記録されている。民間企業での経営経験を参照しながら、組織運営・人事評価制度・ルール検証の仕組みなど「官製慣行の見直し」に関する質疑が繰り返し出現している。同時に、中央区の特性（高出生率、ファミリー層流入、インバウンド増加など）に適合した施策設計を求める姿勢が記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":67,"machi":71,"keizai":73,"fukushi":74,"kenko":75,"kankyo":76,"gyosei":77,"jinken":79,"sumai":80,"bousai":82},[18,68,69,70,50],22,57,17,[18,41,72,72,48],20,[18,33,42,33,24],[18,44,28,41,29],[18,44,70,24,26],[18,44,25,41,26],[18,26,78,46,9],15,[18,34,48,34,18],[18,9,34,81,18],12,[18,18,50,81,48],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":85,"name":86,"party":7,"photo_url":87,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":88,"top_topics":89,"summary":90,"evidence":91,"fields":92,"field_years":116},365,"小坂和輝","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fk_kosaka.jpg?202305",529,[],"インフラ整備・都市開発と子育て・福祉施策の連携に関する質問が多く記録されており、人口増加に伴う学校不足・帯域超過への懸念、既存住民の生活環境保全、個別ケースへの丁寧な対応を重視する姿勢が一貫して表れている。区の長期計画における財政根拠の明確化、関係機関横断的な調整体制の整備を求める発言も多数残されている。",[],{"kosodate":93,"machi":98,"kankyo":101,"sumai":104,"bousai":105,"fukushi":108,"kenko":110,"gyosei":113,"keizai":114,"jinken":115},[18,94,95,96,97],43,72,115,19,[18,99,32,100,26],53,80,[18,102,45,103,44],26,41,[18,28,25,70,24],[18,81,106,107,11],36,51,[18,109,32,103,44],34,[18,19,111,112,34],35,33,[18,41,25,102,26],[18,46,24,111,24],[18,34,48,41,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":118,"name":119,"party":7,"photo_url":120,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":121,"top_topics":122,"summary":123,"evidence":124,"fields":125,"field_years":142},351,"青木かの","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F07aoki.jpg?202305",472,[],"再開発による生活環境への影響、高層マンションの防災対策、水害対策など、都市課題の具体的・多角的な検証が発言記録に多く見られる。同時に、防災拠点の機能強化、学校施設の地域貢献活用、水辺環境の整備といった施策実現への具体的な質問や提案が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":126,"fukushi":128,"machi":129,"keizai":132,"kenko":134,"kosodate":135,"sumai":137,"gyosei":139,"kankyo":140,"jinken":141},[18,127,69,111,11],50,[18,50,46,24,34],[18,130,131,109,37],66,47,[18,133,97,29,29],18,[18,112,133,41,41],[18,136,94,11,48],55,[18,138,68,22,11],42,[18,78,72,34,48],[18,97,102,37,29],[18,29,9,18,34],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":144,"name":145,"party":146,"photo_url":147,"terms":34,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":148,"top_topics":149,"summary":150,"evidence":151,"fields":152,"field_years":166},360,"梶谷優香","みらいテーブル","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fy_kajigaya.jpg?202305",339,[],"防災・福祉・保育・商工振興など区の幅広い施策について、予算執行率・事業実績・課題解決方法を細かく確認する質問が記録されている。実装された施策の具体的な成果や利用状況、経年比較での改善状況を追跡する傾向が見られる。",[],{"machi":153,"bousai":154,"kosodate":155,"kenko":157,"gyosei":158,"fukushi":161,"kankyo":162,"keizai":163,"sumai":164,"jinken":165},[18,68,68,11,46],[18,109,32,22,46],[18,42,138,156,44],30,[18,102,45,11,34],[18,159,160,37,46],38,61,[18,37,78,97,46],[18,78,37,25,26],[18,25,133,37,26],[18,44,46,48,34],[18,48,26,34,34],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":168,"name":169,"party":146,"photo_url":170,"terms":34,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":171,"top_topics":172,"summary":173,"evidence":174,"fields":175,"field_years":186},368,"高橋元気","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fg_takahashi.jpg?202305",67,[],"区の施策・事業評価や制度設計の詳細に関する質問が多く記録されている。指定管理者評価基準の統一性、再発防止策の具体性、情報公開の分かりやすさなど、区の内部運営プロセスの改善を求める指摘が繰り返されている。また急速な人口増加に伴う公共施設・交通・保育の需給ギャップに関心を持ち、地域偏在や先制的な対策の必要性を指摘する発言が複数回記録されている。",[],{"bousai":176,"kosodate":177,"kenko":178,"machi":179,"kankyo":180,"sumai":181,"fukushi":182,"keizai":183,"jinken":184,"gyosei":185},[18,44,34,26,26],[18,48,9,72,33],[18,34,18,44,48],[18,48,34,48,26],[18,44,34,44,26],[18,34,9,9,34],[18,9,18,26,46],[18,9,9,41,26],[18,9,18,34,9],[18,9,18,18,48],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":188,"name":189,"party":190,"photo_url":191,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":192,"top_topics":193,"summary":194,"evidence":195,"fields":196,"field_years":208},375,"堀田弥生","公明党","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F06hotta.jpg?2025",461,[],"福祉・保健・教育分野の行政課題に関する具体的な質疑と提案が多く記録されている。区民の日常生活に関わる細かい課題（介護認定調査の不在対応、障害者送迎バスの運行、子どもの不登校対策など）を取り上げ、実施状況の確認と改善要望を行う傾向が見られる。また、防災やバリアフリー化など、まちづくり全体に関わる政策についても関心を示す発言が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":197,"kosodate":199,"kenko":200,"bousai":201,"keizai":202,"machi":203,"gyosei":204,"kankyo":205,"sumai":206,"jinken":207},[18,131,138,198,68],52,[18,109,112,19,41],[18,103,49,32,133],[18,41,28,28,33],[18,81,33,37,81],[18,78,133,78,41],[18,46,29,48,9],[18,29,11,41,44],[18,44,33,29,34],[18,18,46,24,48],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":210,"name":211,"party":190,"photo_url":212,"terms":46,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":81,"top_topics":213,"summary":214,"evidence":215,"fields":216,"field_years":227},370,"田中広一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Ftanaka.jpg?202305",[],"区民文教委員会と企画総務委員会の委員長として、条例改正や施設視察などの委員会運営に関わる報告が多く記録されている。また経済対策、防災、教育などの行政課題について、区長・教育長に対する一般質問を複数回実施した発言が確認される。",[],{"bousai":217,"fukushi":218,"kosodate":219,"kenko":220,"machi":221,"kankyo":222,"keizai":223,"gyosei":224,"jinken":225,"sumai":226},[18,44,48,34,18],[18,44,34,9,18],[18,34,24,34,18],[18,34,44,18,18],[18,34,44,18,18],[18,9,9,18,18],[18,34,46,18,18],[18,34,34,18,18],[18,9,9,18,18],[18,9,9,18,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":229,"name":230,"party":190,"photo_url":231,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":232,"top_topics":233,"summary":234,"evidence":235,"fields":236,"field_years":247},367,"墨谷浩一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F15sumiya.jpg?202411",204,[],"福祉・子育て・防災・健康寿命など地域課題への施策充実を求める質問が多く記録されている。行政の具体的取組に対し、実現状況・対象者への周知・サービス拡大の可能性を丁寧に確認する姿勢が読み取れる。",[],{"kosodate":237,"kenko":238,"keizai":239,"bousai":240,"fukushi":241,"sumai":242,"machi":243,"kankyo":244,"gyosei":245,"jinken":246},[18,97,97,33,44],[18,81,25,97,9],[18,46,11,11,44],[18,33,133,33,46],[18,50,37,22,46],[18,46,29,11,44],[18,41,24,133,26],[18,33,41,70,34],[18,26,48,48,9],[18,34,9,44,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":249,"name":250,"party":251,"photo_url":252,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":253,"top_topics":254,"summary":255,"evidence":256,"fields":257,"field_years":272},377,"山本理恵","区民クラブ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F16yamamoto.jpg?202305",342,[],"子育て・福祉・防災・都市整備など幅広い分野にわたり、施策の詳細な仕組みや予算執行状況を確認する質疑が多く記録されている。制度の運用実績、対象者の範囲、財源負担の在り方について具体的な数字をもとに掘り下げる傾向が見られ、政策効果や課題の把握に重きを置いた質問が目立つ。",[],{"kosodate":258,"kenko":260,"gyosei":261,"fukushi":262,"kankyo":265,"keizai":266,"bousai":268,"machi":269,"sumai":270,"jinken":271},[18,259,112,198,48],37,[18,94,102,28,34],[18,259,22,72,34],[18,263,264,42,46],44,23,[18,42,133,102,26],[18,267,42,68,9],25,[18,50,11,22,18],[18,45,37,112,18],[18,11,44,29,9],[18,46,34,26,9],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":274,"name":275,"party":251,"photo_url":276,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":277,"top_topics":278,"summary":279,"evidence":280,"fields":281,"field_years":294},378,"渡部恵子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F18k_watanabe.jpg?202305",420,[],"防災・まちづくり・福祉・教育など複数分野にわたり、統計データや学術研究を引用しながら具体的な課題提起と改善提案を行う発言が記録されている。行政施策の実現可能性や現場への影響を細かく検証し、事業の詳細設計に対する質問が多い傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":282,"fukushi":283,"kosodate":284,"kenko":286,"machi":287,"kankyo":288,"keizai":289,"jinken":291,"sumai":292,"gyosei":293},[18,48,25,45,11],[18,26,28,156,50],[18,48,285,31,41],49,[18,44,102,31,46],[18,26,103,106,41],[18,44,133,264,48],[18,48,31,290,11],39,[18,34,50,78,46],[18,44,25,78,26],[18,34,29,29,46],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":296,"name":297,"party":298,"photo_url":299,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":300,"top_topics":301,"summary":302,"evidence":303,"fields":304,"field_years":315},364,"黒原裕司","参政党","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F44kurohara.jpg?202305",240,[],"財政管理・事業評価の細部に注目し、数値の明確化や実効性の検証を求める発言が多い。施設運営や福祉事業の継続性、物価高騰への対応、人手不足への危機感を繰り返し指摘し、先制的・包括的な対応の必要性を述べている。政策の周知が「限界がある」との前提で、より工夫した伝達方法の模索を提案する傾向が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":305,"machi":306,"sumai":307,"kenko":308,"gyosei":309,"bousai":310,"kosodate":311,"keizai":312,"kankyo":313,"jinken":314},[18,78,26,24,46],[18,11,33,102,44],[18,26,44,46,44],[18,72,50,81,44],[18,70,9,48,34],[18,50,29,29,9],[18,25,26,33,34],[18,50,26,102,44],[18,41,37,78,9],[18,44,18,26,44],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":317,"name":318,"party":319,"photo_url":320,"terms":34,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":321,"top_topics":322,"summary":323,"evidence":324,"fields":325,"field_years":336},366,"白須夏","士魂の会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fn_shirasu.jpg?202606",192,[],"社会保障・福祉・教育など幅広い行政分野について具体的な現状確認と改善提案を行う傾向が記録されている。発言では数字や実績の検証、潜在的な課題への指摘、自助・共助・公助のバランスに関する問題提起が繰り返される。また外国人学校補助金や脱炭素政策など個別施策の理由や継続性を問う質疑が目立つ。",[],{"kankyo":326,"keizai":327,"machi":328,"bousai":329,"fukushi":330,"sumai":331,"kosodate":332,"kenko":333,"gyosei":334,"jinken":335},[18,78,25,133,18],[18,48,11,33,18],[18,46,33,81,18],[18,48,37,78,18],[18,50,72,133,18],[18,29,48,29,18],[18,22,68,102,34],[18,29,78,70,18],[18,44,41,44,18],[18,48,48,25,34],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":338,"name":339,"party":340,"photo_url":341,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":342,"top_topics":343,"summary":344,"evidence":345,"fields":346,"field_years":358},362,"川畑善智","改革の会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F43kawahata.jpg?202305",317,[],"社会保障・福祉・環境・防災など幅広い分野で基礎的な実態確認と改善提案を行う議員として記録されている。質問は施策の詳細な仕組みや数値根拠の確認から始まることが多く、その後、先進事例の紹介や問題点の指摘を通じて改善を促す傾向を示している。",[],{"machi":347,"kankyo":349,"fukushi":350,"kosodate":351,"keizai":352,"gyosei":353,"bousai":354,"sumai":355,"kenko":356,"jinken":357},[18,28,264,348,48],58,[18,78,133,33,34],[18,68,41,267,34],[18,133,11,111,34],[18,29,11,39,26],[18,33,24,264,34],[18,72,156,102,44],[18,24,25,28,9],[18,48,26,29,9],[18,34,34,34,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":360,"name":361,"party":362,"photo_url":363,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":364,"top_topics":365,"summary":366,"evidence":367,"fields":368,"field_years":382},358,"奥村暁子","日本共産党","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F09okumura.jpg?202305",553,[],"区民の生活実態や福祉・労働環境の改善、行政の説明責任と透明性の強化を繰り返し求める発言が記録されている。市街地再開発や民間活用の拡大に対し、行政責任の後退や事業者利益追求のリスクを指摘する質疑が多い。",[],{"kosodate":369,"gyosei":371,"fukushi":372,"keizai":374,"kankyo":376,"jinken":377,"sumai":378,"bousai":379,"kenko":380,"machi":381},[18,370,136,285,46],48,[18,259,159,156,50],[18,112,106,373,24],45,[18,69,375,99,78],86,[18,68,112,264,44],[18,41,34,33,26],[18,81,102,267,26],[18,97,106,42,26],[18,68,72,97,46],[18,45,290,263,29],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":384,"name":385,"party":362,"photo_url":386,"terms":29,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":387,"top_topics":388,"summary":389,"evidence":390,"fields":391,"field_years":403},359,"小栗智恵子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F10oguri.jpg?202305",514,[],"都市再開発・交通・福祉・教育など広範な行政課題について、施策の財政的負担、実施体制の透明性、弱者保護の視点から質問を重ねる傾向が記録されている。個別事業の具体的な数字や仕組みの詳細確認、および行政判断の根拠追及が発言の中核を占める。",[],{"kosodate":392,"machi":394,"jinken":395,"keizai":396,"gyosei":397,"fukushi":398,"bousai":399,"kankyo":400,"sumai":401,"kenko":402},[18,393,198,69,50],63,[18,21,138,21,50],[18,70,46,78,9],[18,111,109,45,46],[18,259,39,33,41],[18,267,39,109,11],[18,70,33,78,34],[18,70,37,97,44],[18,78,37,70,18],[18,97,42,267,34],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":405,"name":406,"party":407,"photo_url":408,"terms":34,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":409,"top_topics":410,"summary":411,"evidence":412,"fields":413,"field_years":424},361,"かみや俊宏","自民党・政策の会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Ft_kamiya.jpg?202306",389,[],"環境建設・都市整備など公共施設関連の委員会で委員長を務め、詳細な数値根拠に基づく質問を重ね、施設改修・再開発事業の全体構想や長期的なまちづくり戦略について行政側に説明を求める発言が多く記録されている。政策評価や予算編成の根拠となる基本計画・決算データへの参照が目立ち、中央区の人口増加や財政規模の増加を踏まえた行財政運営のあり方を問う発言が記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":414,"machi":415,"gyosei":416,"bousai":417,"kankyo":418,"kenko":419,"keizai":420,"fukushi":421,"sumai":422,"jinken":423},[18,263,19,22,9],[18,94,133,94,44],[18,31,44,50,18],[18,259,70,11,18],[18,156,29,127,48],[18,68,50,25,9],[18,68,42,68,18],[18,37,44,133,34],[18,24,18,81,18],[18,44,34,18,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":426,"name":427,"party":407,"photo_url":428,"terms":24,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":429,"top_topics":430,"summary":431,"evidence":432,"fields":433,"field_years":444},374,"原田賢一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F24harada.jpg?202305",1135,[],"委員会の進行・議事運営に関する発言が大多数を占める。採決の実施、質疑の時間配分、委員長・副委員長の指名、会議の開閉など、議事進行上の定型的な発言が記録されている。一部、都市再生やインフラ整備、高齢者・障害者支援、教育施策について具体的な質問・提案の発言も見られる。",[],{"kosodate":434,"keizai":435,"gyosei":436,"bousai":437,"kenko":438,"machi":439,"fukushi":440,"kankyo":441,"sumai":442,"jinken":443},[18,68,31,264,48],[18,48,81,9,18],[18,109,68,78,34],[18,50,78,11,34],[18,33,136,259,29],[18,97,78,81,34],[18,78,32,49,11],[18,48,33,97,9],[18,34,44,34,18],[18,9,41,18,34],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":446,"name":447,"party":407,"photo_url":448,"terms":44,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":449,"top_topics":450,"summary":451,"evidence":452,"fields":453,"field_years":464},372,"塚田秀伸","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fh_tsukada02.jpg?202305",708,[],"委員長職務と質疑発言が記録されている。委員会運営では採決司会・議事進行が中心。質疑では地域課題（再開発・商業施設・町会維持・高齢者支援・がん検診・障害者施設利用）について、実態把握と施策改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":454,"bousai":455,"machi":456,"keizai":457,"gyosei":458,"jinken":459,"kenko":460,"kankyo":461,"fukushi":462,"sumai":463},[18,45,111,46,44],[18,50,109,33,9],[18,29,109,68,26],[18,81,22,41,9],[18,44,106,78,34],[18,48,48,44,18],[18,68,138,29,26],[18,29,78,29,34],[18,11,102,24,26],[18,26,33,46,9],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":466,"name":467,"party":407,"photo_url":468,"terms":34,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":469,"top_topics":470,"summary":471,"evidence":472,"fields":473,"field_years":484},357,"太田太","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fh_ota.jpg?2026",453,[],"地方議会の委員会・本会議における質疑と委員長職務に関する発言記録が大半を占める。自転車活用推進計画、つくばエクスプレス延伸、防災体制、財政協議（都区間配分率）、教育環境、福祉施設など多岐の行政課題について、具体的な進捗状況や数値を確認する質問が記録されている。また委員長として会議進行や採決手続、理事者報告の聴取といった議会運営に関わる発言も多数記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":474,"kankyo":475,"machi":476,"sumai":477,"gyosei":478,"bousai":479,"kenko":480,"fukushi":481,"keizai":482,"jinken":483},[18,25,259,259,33],[18,263,373,68,78],[18,267,112,31,72],[18,41,50,29,11],[18,33,81,24,18],[18,37,31,28,25],[18,11,11,22,11],[18,25,133,37,50],[18,48,50,81,29],[18,9,11,41,41],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":486,"name":487,"party":407,"photo_url":488,"terms":48,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":489,"top_topics":490,"summary":491,"evidence":492,"fields":493,"field_years":504},363,"木村克一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F12kimura.jpg?202305",675,[],"議会の運営・進行に関わる発言が大多数を占めており、委員会の開閉会や採決の進行、議題の整理などの議事運営を司る立場からの発言が記録されている。一般質問では、地元の中央区への愛着と具体的な地域課題（防災対策、交通、まちづくり、福祉行政）への関心が記録されており、特に行政の業務ミス（保険料誤記載など）への指摘と改善要望が複数見られる。",[],{"bousai":494,"fukushi":495,"kosodate":496,"kenko":497,"machi":498,"keizai":499,"sumai":500,"kankyo":501,"gyosei":502,"jinken":503},[18,41,34,22,44],[18,72,41,11,18],[18,78,48,49,46],[18,72,29,29,9],[18,264,50,28,18],[18,44,9,50,18],[18,26,34,41,18],[18,37,9,41,18],[18,25,48,46,18],[18,48,18,44,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":506,"name":507,"party":407,"photo_url":508,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":509,"top_topics":510,"summary":511,"evidence":512,"fields":513,"field_years":525},373,"永井佳代","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F45nagai.jpg?202305",429,[],"子育て・福祉・教育・防災など幅広い分野で、現状把握に基づき施策の詳細な実装方法や課題への対応を質問する傾向が記録されている。質問は構成的で、先行事例の検討や長期的な視点、利用者・当事者の声の反映を重視する姿勢が見られ、制度設計時の実務的な懸念や効果測定の方法についても詳しく尋ねている。",[],{"fukushi":514,"kenko":515,"keizai":516,"jinken":517,"kosodate":518,"machi":520,"kankyo":521,"sumai":522,"bousai":523,"gyosei":524},[18,25,138,39,9],[18,81,32,264,34],[18,33,42,133,44],[18,44,41,70,9],[18,19,94,519,18],69,[18,97,263,22,18],[18,24,22,31,34],[18,44,24,48,18],[18,25,285,107,81],[18,44,50,45,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":527,"name":528,"party":407,"photo_url":529,"terms":44,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":530,"top_topics":531,"summary":532,"evidence":533,"fields":534,"field_years":545},356,"海老原崇智","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Ft_ebihara.jpg?202305",463,[],"教育・子育て・防災・まちづくり等、区民生活に関わる複数の政策課題について、具体的な数字や事例を挙げながら質問・提案する発言が記録されている。予算編成の視点や施設整備、福祉サービスの拡充方針について区の考え方を確認し、実現に向けた要望を述べるスタンスが見られる。",[],{"kosodate":535,"keizai":536,"gyosei":537,"kankyo":538,"fukushi":539,"kenko":540,"bousai":541,"machi":542,"jinken":543,"sumai":544},[18,259,133,70,9],[18,19,41,24,9],[18,49,24,41,34],[18,45,78,25,44],[18,290,22,97,41],[18,32,72,133,24],[18,133,46,41,34],[18,102,29,24,34],[18,29,48,44,26],[18,29,26,44,44],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":547,"name":548,"party":407,"photo_url":549,"terms":26,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":550,"top_topics":551,"summary":552,"evidence":553,"fields":554,"field_years":565},355,"瓜生正高","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F04uriu.jpg?202305",1919,[],"発言記録の大部分は議長職務（議案付託、採決、委員会設置）の定型的な進行であり、個別の政策的スタンスを示す具体的発言は限定的である。ただし、記録に残された実質的発言では、飲食店支援、待機児童解消、保育の質的充実、世代間対立の是正、財政自主性の拡大、再開発事業の利点発信といった複数の行政課題について、地域実態の把握と理事者との連携を重視する姿勢が読み取れる。",[],{"gyosei":555,"fukushi":556,"kenko":557,"kankyo":558,"machi":559,"kosodate":560,"bousai":561,"jinken":562,"keizai":563,"sumai":564},[18,19,97,259,11],[18,131,94,68,29],[18,259,106,25,29],[18,267,264,11,34],[18,22,72,106,44],[18,159,42,39,46],[18,25,37,133,34],[18,34,44,44,34],[18,24,18,46,44],[18,9,34,9,34],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":567,"name":568,"party":407,"photo_url":569,"terms":48,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":24,"top_topics":570,"summary":571,"evidence":572,"fields":573,"field_years":584},371,"田中耕太郎","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F17k_tanaka.jpg?202305",[],"地域コミュニティと子育て環境の充実に関する発言が記録されている。また、行政運営の透明性・ガバナンス強化、物価高騰への区民支援のあり方、デジタル化など社会変化への行政対応について、課題認識と具体的な施策提案を組み合わせた質問が多く見られる。",[],{"bousai":574,"fukushi":575,"kosodate":576,"kenko":577,"machi":578,"keizai":579,"jinken":580,"sumai":581,"kankyo":582,"gyosei":583},[18,34,9,34,18],[18,9,9,9,18],[18,44,9,34,18],[18,34,34,9,18],[18,34,34,9,18],[18,34,34,34,18],[18,9,34,9,18],[18,34,34,34,18],[18,18,9,34,18],[18,18,34,34,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":586,"name":587,"party":407,"photo_url":588,"terms":46,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":589,"top_topics":590,"summary":591,"evidence":592,"fields":593,"field_years":604},353,"礒野忠","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F13isono.jpg?202305",274,[],"児童福祉・教育施設の運営体制や地域との協働を重視する姿勢が記録に多く見られる。待機児童解消、医療的ケア児受け入れ、学童クラブとプレディの一体化といった具体的な施策について、安全性・職員体制・ボランティア維持など現場的観点からの詳細な質問が特徴。築地市場跡地再開発事業では、地元との意見調整の重要性を強調する発言が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":594,"kosodate":595,"kenko":596,"machi":597,"bousai":598,"kankyo":599,"keizai":600,"sumai":601,"gyosei":602,"jinken":603},[18,41,18,24,18],[18,50,18,81,34],[18,46,18,24,9],[18,26,9,37,26],[18,44,18,26,34],[18,44,9,50,34],[18,48,18,26,34],[18,9,18,44,18],[18,18,18,50,18],[18,18,18,9,18],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":606,"name":607,"party":407,"photo_url":608,"terms":34,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":609,"top_topics":610,"summary":611,"evidence":612,"fields":613,"field_years":624},369,"竹内幸美","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002Fy_takeuchi.jpg?202305",719,[],"委員会運営と一般質問で、子育て・高齢者福祉、都市開発、財政運営、地域コミュニティなど幅広いテーマに関する質疑が記録されている。転入人口増加に対応した施設整備・利便性向上と、地域への丁寧な説明・支援の両立を求める発言の傾向が見られる。",[],{"keizai":614,"fukushi":615,"kenko":616,"kosodate":617,"bousai":618,"machi":619,"kankyo":620,"gyosei":621,"sumai":622,"jinken":623},[18,50,72,267,29],[18,81,156,19,264],[18,46,28,72,28],[18,11,259,160,28],[18,48,70,68,25],[18,41,102,103,50],[18,24,136,42,50],[18,9,133,106,22],[18,48,33,50,48],[18,18,46,41,44],[53,54,55,56,57],{"member_id":626,"name":627,"party":628,"photo_url":629,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":11,"role":10,"profile_url":10,"speech_count":446,"top_topics":630,"summary":631,"evidence":632,"fields":633,"field_years":645},352,"アルールうた子","都民ファースト","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.kugikai.city.chuo.lg.jp\u002Fkugikai\u002Fimages\u002F41aruru.jpg?202305",[],"区民からの声や現地での課題把握に基づいた質問が多く記録されている。公園・施設整備、福祉制度、観光施策、環境対策など多岐にわたる分野で、具体的なデータ比較や他区事例を交えながら、区の施策の改善・拡充を求める発言が繰り返し記録されている。",[],{"machi":634,"bousai":636,"kosodate":637,"kenko":638,"keizai":639,"jinken":640,"kankyo":641,"sumai":642,"fukushi":643,"gyosei":644},[18,72,635,49,34],54,[18,46,22,19,34],[18,26,97,111,34],[18,9,81,31,34],[18,48,159,112,18],[18,44,24,70,18],[18,26,72,45,9],[18,44,46,133,18],[18,34,11,68,18],[18,18,11,267,18],[53,54,55,56,57],1789179102581]