[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":994},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fQcpNSFatrlAkEdKdPBLIz8Zz51H83_yoILTyoIB16eo":3},[4,49,76,99,124,153,175,201,222,242,264,283,305,326,355,377,403,429,452,476,496,516,538,557,577,597,617,637,657,679,702,723,743,765,786,812,833,853,873,894,914,933,954,974],{"member_id":5,"name":6,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":11,"top_topics":12,"summary":13,"evidence":14,"fields":15,"field_years":43},565,"勝山 まゆみ","区議会自由民主党","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn86_katuyama.jpg",null,23,237,[],"教育・福祉・都市整備など複数の政策課題について、現状把握と施策の継続・拡充を求める質問が記録に多い。地域の関係者との接触を通じた実態把握に基づき、具体的な改善や支援の拡大を提案する発言傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":16,"kenko":22,"fukushi":27,"kankyo":29,"keizai":32,"machi":35,"bousai":38,"gyosei":40,"jinken":41,"sumai":42},[17,18,19,20,21],0,15,6,34,18,[17,23,24,25,26],5,2,7,1,[17,19,24,28,25],14,[17,19,24,30,31],16,4,[17,33,26,34,26],9,10,[17,31,31,36,37],20,11,[17,39,39,30,18],3,[17,24,26,25,17],[17,39,17,24,17],[17,26,17,19,23],[44,45,46,47,48],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":50,"name":51,"party":7,"photo_url":52,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":53,"top_topics":54,"summary":55,"evidence":56,"fields":57,"field_years":75},569,"小林 智夫","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn90_kobayasi.jpg",257,[],"福祉・子育て・災害対策・教育施設など、生活に密接した行政課題について具体的な質問と提案を記録に多く残している。発言では現場の実務的課題（システム導入の遅延、職員の事務負担、施設職員の待遇改善など）の改善を求める傾向が見られ、同時に先行事例の視察結果や地域との連携状況を根拠に、施策の推進を促す発言が記録されている。",[],{"kankyo":58,"kenko":60,"gyosei":63,"bousai":64,"fukushi":65,"kosodate":68,"machi":70,"keizai":72,"jinken":73,"sumai":74},[17,19,39,59,23],21,[17,61,33,62,23],19,22,[17,39,23,33,24],[17,33,25,30,39],[17,21,66,67,23],12,17,[17,36,18,69,34],27,[17,71,26,34,25],8,[17,23,31,71,25],[17,24,26,24,17],[17,24,26,24,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":77,"name":78,"party":7,"photo_url":79,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":80,"top_topics":81,"summary":82,"evidence":83,"fields":84,"field_years":98},661,"岩田 将和","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn71_iwata.jpg",680,[],"建設委員会の委員長として議事進行にあたる一方、質疑では具体的で細部にこだわる質問が記録されている。著作権法・個人情報・用語定義・制度の複雑さなど、法令や仕組みの厳密さを問う発言が頻出し、同時に行政の説明責任と納税者の納得感を重視する指摘が繰り返される。",[],{"bousai":85,"machi":86,"fukushi":89,"kosodate":90,"keizai":92,"gyosei":93,"kankyo":94,"jinken":95,"kenko":96,"sumai":97},[17,37,67,20,28],[17,30,33,87,88],42,13,[17,23,25,30,31],[17,33,28,91,71],32,[17,31,39,34,25],[17,31,39,88,66],[17,24,31,34,26],[17,24,17,23,24],[17,17,24,37,39],[17,17,31,25,31],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":100,"name":101,"party":7,"photo_url":102,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":103,"top_topics":104,"summary":105,"evidence":106,"fields":107,"field_years":123},705,"島村 和成","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn34_simamura.jpg",1542,[],"総務委員会の委員長として会議進行に関する発言が大多数を占める。議案・予算審査の進行管理、次回開催日程調整、執行部への質問の整理・指示、会派意見の集約といった委員会運営の実務的側面が発言記録に顕著に表れている。一方、個別の政策課題では、不正使用への厳格な対応姿勢や広域的な課題（児相負担の８区連携）への問題提起など、具体的な意見が記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":108,"gyosei":111,"machi":113,"fukushi":114,"kenko":116,"bousai":118,"kankyo":119,"keizai":120,"sumai":121,"jinken":122},[17,109,110,59,19],48,35,[17,112,10,88,23],50,[17,10,34,66,37],[17,115,36,28,33],29,[17,117,10,28,37],26,[17,25,37,71,23],[17,23,88,34,19],[17,71,19,24,17],[17,24,31,39,26],[17,24,24,39,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":125,"name":126,"party":7,"photo_url":127,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":128,"top_topics":129,"summary":130,"evidence":131,"fields":132,"field_years":152},669,"田中 寿一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn10_tanaka.jpg",1299,[],"決算・予算委員会や建設委員会で多数の質問・質疑を行う議員で、区の施策全般にわたって現状把握と今後の方向性を問う発言が記録されている。新川さくら館などの地域施設の活用、学力向上や生活習慣改善などの教育施策、介護人材確保、都市計画・堤防事業、シェアサイクル、タワーホール改修など、広範な分野で詳細な質問を展開し、実績確認とPDCAサイクルの構築、他区事例の研究、課題改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。",[],{"kenko":133,"keizai":135,"machi":137,"kosodate":141,"jinken":145,"kankyo":146,"bousai":147,"fukushi":148,"sumai":149,"gyosei":150},[17,134,39,19,67],39,[17,136,24,36,25],28,[17,138,139,140,37],62,38,53,[17,142,31,143,144],44,30,25,[17,24,26,31,26],[17,30,39,25,25],[17,67,28,66,34],[17,144,31,88,18],[17,25,39,23,26],[17,151,24,66,26],40,[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":154,"name":155,"party":7,"photo_url":156,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":157,"top_topics":158,"summary":159,"evidence":160,"fields":161,"field_years":174},618,"田島 寛之","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn82_tazima.jpg",744,[],"文教委員会を中心に多数の委員会で議事進行や質疑を記録されている議員。地域課題（農業振興地区、災害対応、子ども支援）や行政効率化（電子化、クラウド化）に関する質問が多く、現場関係者との接触を通じた具体的事例に基づいて行政に改善を求める発言パターンが読み取れる。",[],{"gyosei":162,"fukushi":163,"keizai":164,"kenko":165,"bousai":166,"machi":167,"kosodate":168,"kankyo":171,"jinken":172,"sumai":173},[17,24,88,23,31],[17,26,66,25,39],[17,24,21,34,19],[17,24,30,31,26],[17,24,36,33,39],[17,26,69,69,39],[17,24,143,169,170],82,45,[17,26,61,33,24],[17,17,39,25,17],[17,17,39,39,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":176,"name":177,"party":7,"photo_url":178,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":179,"top_topics":180,"summary":181,"evidence":182,"fields":183,"field_years":200},694,"福本 光浩","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn21_fukumoto.jpg",1616,[],"区議会自由民主党に属し、決算特別委員会や文教委員会などで議長・委員長としての進行役を務める発言が大多数を占める。一方、個別の施策については予算計上の根拠や事業成果、他自治体との比較などを詳細に質問する傾向が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":184,"kosodate":185,"bousai":189,"gyosei":190,"machi":193,"keizai":194,"kenko":195,"jinken":197,"sumai":198,"kankyo":199},[17,21,30,39,39],[17,186,187,188,61],63,107,83,[17,61,33,23,39],[17,191,191,192,66],72,43,[17,110,10,67,19],[17,36,34,33,71],[17,144,196,39,24],24,[17,31,39,24,26],[17,39,26,26,26],[17,88,34,24,19],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":202,"name":203,"party":7,"photo_url":204,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":205,"top_topics":206,"summary":207,"evidence":208,"fields":209,"field_years":221},700,"藤澤 進一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn23_fuzisawa.jpg",2117,[],"発言記録は議会運営と予算審査における議事進行・議長職務が大部分を占める。予算特別委員会で歳入歳出の款ごと審査、本会議での議案採決、会期決定など、手続的な議会運営に関わる発言が記録されている。また特定の委員の質問内容について指摘・注意を促す発言が複数記録されている。",[],{"machi":210,"kosodate":212,"fukushi":213,"kenko":214,"kankyo":215,"keizai":216,"sumai":217,"gyosei":218,"bousai":219,"jinken":220},[17,211,66,62,23],37,[17,186,33,87,21],[17,115,59,36,39],[17,134,196,144,23],[17,59,66,88,25],[17,67,26,25,31],[17,31,17,26,24],[17,59,18,138,39],[17,21,31,88,17],[17,24,17,26,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":223,"name":224,"party":7,"photo_url":225,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":226,"top_topics":227,"summary":228,"evidence":229,"fields":230,"field_years":241},664,"野﨑 信","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn74_nozaki.jpg",90,[],"予算・事業の実効性や区民への影響を具体的に確認する質問が多く記録されている。財政的課題・人員体制・段階的実施の可能性など、事業推進の現実的な課題を指摘する発言傾向が見られる。また、地域の具体的な事例（高齢者支援・防災・産業振興等）を議論に組み込む傾向がある。",[],{"kankyo":231,"kosodate":232,"bousai":233,"jinken":234,"machi":235,"kenko":236,"fukushi":237,"sumai":238,"gyosei":239,"keizai":240},[17,39,17,17,26],[17,24,23,17,17],[17,19,31,17,26],[17,24,17,17,17],[17,39,39,17,26],[17,23,24,17,26],[17,39,39,17,26],[17,17,24,17,17],[17,17,24,17,26],[17,17,26,26,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":243,"name":244,"party":7,"photo_url":245,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":246,"top_topics":247,"summary":248,"evidence":249,"fields":250,"field_years":263},573,"金井 高志","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn87_kanai.jpg",568,[],"区の施策や事業執行の詳細な数値根拠を問う質問が記録されており、予算額・執行額の乖離、参加者数の推移、事業効果の測定方法などについて具体的なデータ提示を求める傾向が見られる。また、災害対策・教育格差・多文化共生・地域ブランド向上など複数の政策領域にわたって継続的な関心を持つ発言が記録されている。",[],{"gyosei":251,"fukushi":252,"kosodate":253,"kankyo":255,"bousai":256,"machi":257,"keizai":259,"sumai":260,"kenko":261,"jinken":262},[17,24,192,136,71],[17,39,61,19,66],[17,23,254,21,196],47,[17,39,66,34,28],[17,24,10,37,88],[17,24,258,34,23],31,[17,26,59,25,19],[17,24,71,24,31],[17,17,28,25,66],[17,17,88,25,31],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":265,"name":266,"party":7,"photo_url":267,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":268,"top_topics":269,"summary":270,"evidence":271,"fields":272,"field_years":282},703,"須賀 精二","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn31_suga.jpg",996,[],"発言記録の大部分は委員会運営に関する司会進行であり、委員会開閉会の宣告、日程調整、陳情・請願の審査進行、署名報告、執行部報告の指示などが記録されている。個別の政策議論への発言は限定的で、給食費無償化やスピーキングテスト中止陳情、有機食材導入請願などの複数案件について会派の検討状況を報告する発言が記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":273,"kenko":274,"machi":275,"bousai":276,"fukushi":277,"kankyo":278,"keizai":279,"jinken":280,"gyosei":281},[17,143,110,39,17],[17,25,117,26,17],[17,34,59,25,39],[17,34,117,196,37],[17,24,36,31,17],[17,24,30,39,17],[17,31,71,31,17],[17,24,31,17,17],[17,17,18,17,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":284,"name":285,"party":7,"photo_url":286,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":287,"top_topics":288,"summary":289,"evidence":290,"fields":291,"field_years":304},697,"高木 秀隆","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn22_takagi.jpg",1189,[],"公共施設の予定価格設定・入札制度、学校改築事業、福祉・医療施設の利用促進、行政のデジタル化推進に関する質問・指摘が発言記録に多く残されている。施策の実行段階での具体的課題（物価高騰への対応、業者参入の工夫、利用者ニーズとのギャップ解消）について、執行部に改善や検討を求める発言が記録されている。",[],{"kenko":292,"fukushi":293,"bousai":294,"machi":295,"gyosei":296,"sumai":298,"kosodate":299,"keizai":301,"kankyo":302,"jinken":303},[17,30,28,26,26],[17,144,62,39,24],[17,67,21,31,24],[17,62,36,31,26],[17,115,297,61,25],55,[17,25,21,17,17],[17,300,297,136,23],41,[17,136,21,23,19],[17,21,66,31,26],[17,24,39,26,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":306,"name":307,"party":7,"photo_url":308,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":309,"top_topics":310,"summary":311,"evidence":312,"fields":313,"field_years":325},622,"鹿倉 勇","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn80_sikakura.jpg",1352,[],"委員会運営と予算審査で主導的な役割を担う議員で、災害対策・街づくり推進特別委員会の委員長職務が記録の大部分を占める。委員会開催日程の決定、議案審査の進行管理、執行部報告の受付など手続的な発言が多く、同時に学校統廃合に伴う通学負担、物価高騰対策、少子化対策、防災備蓄環境整備など、地域の生活課題に関わる具体的な質問・要望を記録に残している。",[],{"bousai":314,"machi":315,"kosodate":316,"keizai":318,"kenko":319,"fukushi":320,"kankyo":321,"gyosei":322,"jinken":323,"sumai":324},[17,30,136,69,62],[17,66,37,62,31],[17,88,61,317,10],68,[17,39,33,36,39],[17,39,19,69,39],[17,24,39,139,31],[17,31,23,36,31],[17,24,37,87,37],[17,26,24,24,17],[17,24,24,26,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":327,"name":328,"party":329,"photo_url":330,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":331,"top_topics":332,"summary":333,"evidence":334,"fields":335,"field_years":354},625,"大橋 美枝子","日本共産党江戸川区議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn60_oohasi.jpg",1777,[],"福祉・教育・環境など広範な分野で、区の施策に対して具体的な質問と改善提案を記録に残している。国の制度改革や都の政策に関わる課題について、区としての対応や見解を求める発言が多い。同性婚や貧困対策など社会的課題に関わる意見表明も記録されている。",[],{"gyosei":336,"bousai":338,"keizai":340,"kosodate":341,"sumai":346,"fukushi":347,"kenko":349,"machi":350,"jinken":352,"kankyo":353},[17,317,337,87,28],46,[17,134,136,339,39],33,[17,87,254,254,66],[17,342,343,344,345],116,114,219,101,[17,71,37,28,17],[17,186,337,348,37],49,[17,142,110,10,19],[17,151,254,351,19],67,[17,62,23,23,25],[17,117,196,69,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":356,"name":357,"party":329,"photo_url":358,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":359,"top_topics":360,"summary":361,"evidence":362,"fields":363,"field_years":376},577,"太田 彩花","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn85_oota.jpg",466,[],"教育・子ども支援、公共施設（図書館）、労働環境改善に関する具体的な質問と改善要望が記録されている。数値データの提示を求めたり、他自治体の先行事例と比較しながら、現状の問題点を指摘し制度設計の見直しを求める発言が多い。",[],{"kosodate":364,"machi":367,"kankyo":368,"keizai":369,"fukushi":370,"gyosei":371,"bousai":372,"kenko":373,"sumai":374,"jinken":375},[17,143,365,366,67],110,51,[17,34,91,69,18],[17,25,28,34,39],[17,19,28,28,25],[17,66,37,66,19],[17,23,23,71,31],[17,31,37,19,26],[17,19,37,28,24],[17,39,39,23,39],[17,17,24,31,31],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":378,"name":379,"party":329,"photo_url":380,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":381,"top_topics":382,"summary":383,"evidence":384,"fields":385,"field_years":402},673,"小俣 則子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn1_omata.jpg",1442,[],"区の施策や予算に関して数値根拠や計算方法の詳細を問い質す発言が多く記録されている。また、区民生活に影響する施策（保育、介護保険、障害者支援、子ども食堂など）について、対象者の実態把握や当事者参加の必要性を指摘する発言が目立つ。さらに、東京都の広域課題（児童相談所の財政負担、マイナンバーカード制度など）に関わる問題提起も多い。",[],{"fukushi":386,"gyosei":389,"kenko":390,"kosodate":391,"keizai":396,"jinken":397,"machi":398,"bousai":399,"kankyo":400,"sumai":401},[17,387,351,388,170],54,77,[17,36,300,143,28],[17,191,170,388,110],[17,392,393,394,395],79,130,129,66,[17,37,144,140,59],[17,33,33,23,26],[17,71,196,36,19],[17,37,142,36,71],[17,88,21,10,25],[17,17,33,37,33],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":404,"name":405,"party":329,"photo_url":406,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":407,"top_topics":408,"summary":409,"evidence":410,"fields":411,"field_years":428},581,"牧野 けんじ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn75_makino.jpg",1429,[],"都市計画道路や区画整理事業など大型開発プロジェクトについて、事業の必要性・透明性・住民理解を問い質す発言が多く記録されている。また行政手続きの適正性や情報公開の充実を求める質疑が特徴的である。",[],{"kenko":412,"fukushi":413,"kankyo":414,"bousai":415,"kosodate":417,"keizai":419,"machi":421,"gyosei":425,"sumai":426,"jinken":427},[17,18,34,30,23],[17,143,20,110,37],[17,33,71,19,37],[17,387,416,348,18],64,[17,139,115,418,62],86,[17,136,115,420,36],70,[17,422,423,424,348],140,147,106,[17,67,69,317,18],[17,37,71,66,39],[17,39,31,33,39],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":430,"name":431,"party":432,"photo_url":433,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":434,"top_topics":435,"summary":436,"evidence":437,"fields":438,"field_years":451},685,"中道 貴","江戸川区議会公明党","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn18_nakamiti.jpg",1263,[],"区議会公明党の代表質問・代表意見を担当する議員で、予算審査や福祉・防災関連の委員会で質問・要望が多く記録されている。現場の声を重視し、課題解決に向けた具体的な施策の改善・拡充を求める発言が特徴的。国際情勢や国の政策動向に言及する場面も見られる。",[],{"gyosei":439,"kosodate":440,"bousai":441,"fukushi":442,"kenko":444,"machi":446,"kankyo":447,"keizai":448,"jinken":449,"sumai":450},[17,36,30,10,30],[17,339,10,20,136],[17,30,144,31,37],[17,10,31,443,151],76,[17,69,71,445,20],58,[17,23,37,23,39],[17,25,19,23,25],[17,19,23,31,33],[17,23,24,24,24],[17,31,31,23,88],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":453,"name":454,"party":432,"photo_url":455,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":456,"top_topics":457,"summary":458,"evidence":459,"fields":460,"field_years":475},682,"伊藤 照子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn17_itou.jpg",1232,[],"子ども・福祉・健康分野における施策の具体的内容と効果測定について、丁寧に質問する発言が多く記録されている。制度導入時の現場への影響や利用者ニーズの把握、関係機関連携といった実装面での課題に焦点を当てる傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":461,"kosodate":462,"kankyo":466,"kenko":468,"machi":469,"keizai":470,"sumai":471,"gyosei":472,"jinken":473,"bousai":474},[17,196,66,170,196],[17,463,464,465,416],93,85,97,[17,467,258,21,196],59,[17,91,30,139,67],[17,151,30,59,61],[17,67,67,117,196],[17,39,25,88,66],[17,67,23,33,34],[17,66,31,39,31],[17,34,59,339,21],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":477,"name":478,"party":432,"photo_url":479,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":480,"top_topics":481,"summary":482,"evidence":483,"fields":484,"field_years":495},611,"佐々木 勇一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn56_sasaki.jpg",600,[],"福祉・教育・防災・都市開発など広範な分野で質疑を行う記録が残っている。具体的な制度設計や運用方法の詳細を確認する質問が多く、施策の周知方法・実施体制・予算配分の効率性などに着目する発言パターンが見られる。また地元地域の課題（新川の環境問題、市街地再開発など）と区全体の政策を結びつけるコメントも記録されている。",[],{"machi":485,"keizai":486,"fukushi":487,"kosodate":488,"kenko":489,"gyosei":490,"jinken":491,"sumai":492,"bousai":493,"kankyo":494},[17,88,25,62,66],[17,33,88,88,66],[17,31,62,10,36],[17,61,61,112,211],[17,31,144,25,18],[17,19,144,144,19],[17,24,19,18,23],[17,31,31,31,26],[17,66,33,88,34],[17,19,31,28,33],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":497,"name":498,"party":432,"photo_url":499,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":500,"top_topics":501,"summary":502,"evidence":503,"fields":504,"field_years":515},602,"佐野 朋子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn91_sano.jpg",259,[],"福祉・教育・子育て支援施策の詳細な実装状況を質問する発言が記録されている。制度利用の拡大、サービス対象の拡充、デジタル化による業務効率化などを繰り返し取り上げ、現場課題の解決や利用者利便の向上を求める質問傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":505,"fukushi":506,"kosodate":507,"kenko":508,"machi":509,"kankyo":510,"jinken":511,"sumai":512,"keizai":513,"gyosei":514},[17,39,23,88,39],[17,71,30,67,24],[17,21,115,117,31],[17,71,37,18,24],[17,26,19,33,24],[17,25,31,28,26],[17,39,39,23,17],[17,26,24,26,17],[17,26,19,31,26],[17,17,31,23,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":517,"name":518,"party":432,"photo_url":519,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":520,"top_topics":521,"summary":522,"evidence":523,"fields":524,"field_years":537},658,"堀江 創一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn8_horie.jpg",946,[],"福祉・子ども・防災分野での質問が多く記録されており、社会的養護が必要な児童への支援、災害時要配慮者対策、介護人材確保などの施策について、実施状況の詳細な説明を求め、新規事業の背景や課題の把握を重視する姿勢が見られる。また、行政のデジタル化推進（電子申請・メタバース等）に関して前向きに評価しつつ、利便性向上の継続を要望する発言も多く記録されている。",[],{"bousai":525,"fukushi":526,"machi":528,"kosodate":529,"gyosei":530,"sumai":531,"kenko":532,"keizai":534,"jinken":535,"kankyo":536},[17,25,28,59,26],[17,25,527,142,17],84,[17,31,88,144,39],[17,71,67,192,17],[17,25,59,21,39],[17,39,24,19,17],[17,25,533,254,17],80,[17,24,25,66,17],[17,23,24,23,17],[17,24,34,28,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":539,"name":540,"party":432,"photo_url":541,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":542,"top_topics":543,"summary":544,"evidence":545,"fields":546,"field_years":556},650,"太田 公弘","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn62_oota.jpg",228,[],"区民生活に関わる具体的な地域課題や福祉・防災分野での質問・要望が記録されている。DX推進、町会法人化支援、地域防災計画、高齢者福祉施設の利用者把握、生活保護行政の改善など、基礎自治体の業務に関する細節的な確認や提案が多く見られる。また監査委員及び副議長の職務を歴任した経歴が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":547,"kosodate":548,"bousai":549,"kenko":550,"machi":551,"kankyo":552,"keizai":553,"gyosei":554,"sumai":555},[17,24,39,23,17],[17,39,26,23,17],[17,24,17,24,17],[17,24,17,25,17],[17,24,17,23,17],[17,26,26,23,26],[17,26,17,24,17],[17,26,17,24,17],[17,26,17,17,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":558,"name":559,"party":432,"photo_url":560,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":561,"top_topics":562,"summary":563,"evidence":564,"fields":565,"field_years":576},607,"川合 佐奈子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn88_kawai.jpg",330,[],"介護・保育・子育て支援など福祉分野での質問が大多数を占め、事業の具体的な実施状況や数値、対象者の声に基づいた改善提案を繰り返し記録している。同時に、防災・環境・交通・医療など幅広い分野にも質問が及び、現場の細部に着目しながら行政への聞き取りと要望を行う姿勢が一貫して見られる。",[],{"kenko":566,"fukushi":567,"bousai":568,"kosodate":569,"machi":570,"kankyo":571,"keizai":572,"gyosei":573,"sumai":574,"jinken":575},[17,31,18,59,28],[17,71,88,196,21],[17,26,25,18,71],[17,26,117,136,21],[17,26,28,30,33],[17,24,33,37,25],[17,26,33,34,31],[17,17,39,39,31],[17,17,39,26,39],[17,17,26,24,23],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":578,"name":579,"party":432,"photo_url":580,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":581,"top_topics":582,"summary":583,"evidence":584,"fields":585,"field_years":596},691,"川瀬 泰徳","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn29_kawase.jpg",927,[],"福祉健康委員会の委員長を務め、委員会運営と陳情審査に関する発言が大部分。地元課題（橋梁整備、公園整備、公衆浴場支援など）への関心と、執行部への具体的な対応要望が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":586,"kenko":587,"keizai":588,"kosodate":589,"bousai":590,"machi":591,"kankyo":592,"jinken":593,"sumai":594,"gyosei":595},[17,192,151,23,26],[17,142,139,34,39],[17,71,66,39,17],[17,36,61,23,17],[17,67,88,26,17],[17,62,91,66,39],[17,31,25,39,17],[17,26,26,26,17],[17,39,39,17,17],[17,66,23,66,71],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":598,"name":599,"party":432,"photo_url":600,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":601,"top_topics":602,"summary":603,"evidence":604,"fields":605,"field_years":616},614,"所 隆宏","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn58_tokoro.jpg",717,[],"委員会運営や執行部への質疑で、具体的な事業成果・課題・今後の展開について多角的に問う発言が記録されている。福祉・教育・環境・DX等の広範な施策について、事業の効果測定や他自治体との比較、区民への周知方法など実装面の質問が特徴的である。",[],{"kosodate":606,"kenko":607,"gyosei":608,"kankyo":609,"keizai":610,"fukushi":611,"machi":612,"bousai":613,"sumai":614,"jinken":615},[17,20,66,66,24],[17,28,23,26,26],[17,59,67,24,17],[17,30,192,21,17],[17,21,88,39,26],[17,91,66,24,26],[17,136,144,37,17],[17,10,67,19,17],[17,23,19,26,17],[17,26,26,26,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":618,"name":619,"party":432,"photo_url":620,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":621,"top_topics":622,"summary":623,"evidence":624,"fields":625,"field_years":636},653,"窪田 龍一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn7_kubota.jpg",627,[],"公明党江戸川区議会議員。委員会運営と議案審査に多く関与し、教育・福祉・都市整備など広範な分野で質疑を展開。区の施策の根拠や数値、具体的内容の説明を求める質問が記録に多く見られ、区民への情報周知と区職員の取組み評価を重視する発言傾向がある。",[],{"machi":626,"kosodate":627,"gyosei":628,"fukushi":629,"kenko":630,"bousai":631,"kankyo":632,"keizai":633,"jinken":634,"sumai":635},[17,31,19,30,23],[17,26,33,136,17],[17,39,26,66,17],[17,31,17,33,17],[17,26,26,31,17],[17,17,31,37,17],[17,17,39,91,18],[17,17,26,88,17],[17,17,17,26,17],[17,17,17,24,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":638,"name":639,"party":432,"photo_url":640,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":641,"top_topics":642,"summary":643,"evidence":644,"fields":645,"field_years":656},687,"竹内 進","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn20_takeuti.jpg",275,[],"特別委員会の委員長・副委員長を務めており、健康・福祉・子ども・防災など複数分野の行政課題について、個別の具体的進捗状況の確認と、課題解決に向けた前向きな対応を求める質問が記録されている。質問では、現場視察や施策の詳細な検証を重視する傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":646,"kenko":647,"kosodate":648,"gyosei":649,"bousai":650,"kankyo":651,"sumai":652,"jinken":653,"keizai":654,"machi":655},[17,36,25,24,24],[17,117,34,17,24],[17,10,24,24,24],[17,66,31,26,17],[17,28,26,26,24],[17,25,25,26,17],[17,19,24,24,17],[17,26,26,26,17],[17,34,26,26,17],[17,25,23,24,25],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":658,"name":659,"party":432,"photo_url":660,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":661,"top_topics":662,"summary":663,"evidence":664,"fields":665,"field_years":678},679,"関根 麻美子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn9_sekine.jpg",742,[],"福祉・教育・子育て施策の具体化と課題解決に関する質疑が記録に多く見られる。施策の実績評価・検証を求めつつ、現場の実装段階での課題把握と改善提案を重ねる発言パターンが特徴である。",[],{"fukushi":666,"kosodate":667,"jinken":670,"machi":671,"bousai":672,"gyosei":673,"kankyo":674,"sumai":675,"kenko":676,"keizai":677},[17,300,151,20,25],[17,668,187,669,18],109,115,[17,66,34,19,24],[17,139,88,66,24],[17,115,10,139,24],[17,18,10,258,23],[17,61,36,36,24],[17,23,31,39,17],[17,139,144,21,25],[17,34,10,62,34],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":680,"name":681,"party":682,"photo_url":683,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":684,"top_topics":685,"summary":686,"evidence":687,"fields":688,"field_years":701},634,"小林 あすか","無所属の会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn78_Gn78_kobayasi.png",623,[],"子育て・教育・福祉など生活に密接した施策について、詳細なデータ・年代別分析・適用範囲の線引きなどの具体的な仕組みを質問する傾向が記録されている。また、区の計画・予算の区民への周知状況や、入札制度・工事費の妥当性について繰り返し検証する姿勢が見られる。",[],{"kenko":689,"gyosei":690,"kosodate":691,"machi":694,"keizai":695,"jinken":696,"bousai":697,"kankyo":698,"fukushi":699,"sumai":700},[17,62,61,18,31],[17,88,117,88,26],[17,692,692,693,20],95,65,[17,117,69,117,31],[17,88,23,34,24],[17,37,31,19,17],[17,61,18,18,23],[17,28,18,36,25],[17,21,88,23,25],[17,26,17,24,24],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":703,"name":704,"party":682,"photo_url":705,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":706,"top_topics":707,"summary":708,"evidence":709,"fields":710,"field_years":722},636,"神尾 昭央","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn70_kamio.jpg",328,[],"地域課題の詳細な事実確認と、事業実施時の住民への情報提供・説明機会の充実を重視する発言が記録されている。防災・交通安全・都市計画など複数分野で、計画の根拠資料の確認、対象住民への丁寧な説明、工事期間中の情報開示を求める質問が繰り返し行われている。",[],{"bousai":711,"machi":712,"kosodate":714,"kankyo":715,"jinken":716,"gyosei":717,"fukushi":718,"kenko":719,"keizai":720,"sumai":721},[17,66,30,37,39],[17,211,713,10,34],36,[17,37,28,71,39],[17,88,33,19,24],[17,39,24,24,17],[17,23,39,71,17],[17,23,19,31,31],[17,39,24,24,17],[17,39,23,26,26],[17,26,31,24,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":724,"name":725,"party":682,"photo_url":726,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":727,"top_topics":728,"summary":729,"evidence":730,"fields":731,"field_years":742},642,"金井 しげる","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn77_kanai.jpg",253,[],"地域課題への関心が広く、防災・町会活動・高齢者支援・公園整備・喫煙対策など多分野にわたる質問や意見を残している。また陳情の審査では、慎重に検討しつつも「出せるものは早期に結論を」という姿勢を繰り返し表明する記録が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":732,"kenko":733,"kosodate":734,"kankyo":735,"bousai":736,"sumai":737,"keizai":738,"machi":739,"gyosei":740,"jinken":741},[17,67,33,39,31],[17,88,71,71,17],[17,117,66,21,34],[17,37,18,66,25],[17,37,33,31,23],[17,39,26,26,39],[17,23,39,23,24],[17,25,144,25,31],[17,24,24,26,26],[17,17,26,24,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":744,"name":745,"party":682,"photo_url":746,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":747,"top_topics":748,"summary":749,"evidence":750,"fields":751,"field_years":764},646,"間宮 由美","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn13_mamiya.jpg",971,[],"教育・福祉・防災など多領域にわたって、行政施策の詳細な実施状況・根拠・数値を質問する傾向が記録されている。同時に、現場職員の負担軽減や利用者の声の汲み取り、制度の周知徹底を求める発言が多く、制度設計と運用の乖離を指摘する姿勢が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":752,"kosodate":753,"kenko":755,"kankyo":757,"jinken":758,"gyosei":759,"machi":760,"bousai":761,"keizai":762,"sumai":763},[17,115,337,87,10],[17,388,754,392,337],60,[17,62,756,142,66],57,[17,18,71,31,28],[17,23,39,24,26],[17,25,30,19,31],[17,37,34,37,71],[17,36,192,115,18],[17,25,25,28,28],[17,19,34,33,34],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":766,"name":767,"party":768,"photo_url":769,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":770,"top_topics":771,"summary":772,"evidence":773,"fields":774,"field_years":785},553,"五十嵐 まさお","無所属議員","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn84_igarasi.jpg",160,[],"新型コロナワクチンの安全性と健康被害救済制度、学校給食の食材選定、教科書採択、マイナンバー制度など、公衆衛生・教育・行政デジタル化に関する複数の陳情・請願で紹介議員や採択支持の立場を記録されている。特にワクチン被害統計データを繰り返し引用し、厚生労働省公表の認定件数と死亡者数を具体的に述べながら、リスク周知と救済制度の周知改善を求める発言が目立つ。",[],{"kosodate":775,"kenko":776,"kankyo":777,"bousai":778,"fukushi":779,"keizai":780,"gyosei":781,"jinken":782,"machi":783,"sumai":784},[17,33,25,66,28],[17,28,69,28,25],[17,19,39,33,34],[17,31,39,31,25],[17,23,31,39,17],[17,39,39,24,26],[17,23,23,39,39],[17,31,39,33,71],[17,26,26,23,19],[17,17,26,17,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":787,"name":788,"party":768,"photo_url":789,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":790,"top_topics":791,"summary":792,"evidence":793,"fields":794,"field_years":811},595,"滝沢 泰子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn16_takizawa.jpg",1930,[],"社会的少数者や支援が行き届きにくい層への施策充実と情報格差の解消に関する質問・要望が記録に多く見られる。行政手続きの負担軽減、施設のバリアフリー化・ユニバーサルデザイン、市民参加・透明性の向上を一貫して取り上げている。",[],{"fukushi":795,"kosodate":797,"kenko":801,"jinken":802,"kankyo":803,"bousai":804,"machi":806,"keizai":807,"gyosei":809,"sumai":810},[17,533,188,796,337],117,[17,798,799,800,142],123,134,124,[17,254,87,366,10],[17,713,69,87,31],[17,300,139,20,19],[17,191,805,337,30],73,[17,443,226,142,39],[17,808,87,134,69],56,[17,387,254,144,28],[17,34,33,30,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":813,"name":814,"party":815,"photo_url":816,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":817,"top_topics":818,"summary":819,"evidence":820,"fields":821,"field_years":832},561,"丸山 れいこ","維新と区民の会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn95_maruyama.jpg",531,[],"地方行政の透明性・情報公開と区民への情報伝達方法に関する質問が多く記録されている。また、高齢化社会における認知症対策、障害児支援、動物愛護など福祉分野の具体的な施策内容・実績データの確認を求める発言が顕著である。区民生活に関わる委託事業や公共料金の適正性、災害対策の実行状況についても継続的に質問を重ねている傾向が見られる。",[],{"kenko":822,"fukushi":823,"kosodate":824,"kankyo":825,"jinken":826,"keizai":827,"bousai":828,"gyosei":829,"sumai":830,"machi":831},[17,19,59,196,39],[17,37,258,69,18],[17,30,36,136,23],[17,23,23,28,37],[17,26,24,66,39],[17,23,31,28,25],[17,19,144,61,25],[17,33,21,10,39],[17,24,31,24,19],[17,39,59,10,18],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":834,"name":835,"party":815,"photo_url":836,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":837,"top_topics":838,"summary":839,"evidence":840,"fields":841,"field_years":852},557,"林 あきこ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn94_hayasi.jpg",512,[],"子育て支援、教育行政、福祉制度の詳細な実績把握と改善提案を重視する発言が多く記録されている。同時に、行政の説明責任と透明性を求める姿勢が一貫しており、具体的な数字や根拠に基づく質疑応答を積み重ねる傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":842,"keizai":843,"machi":844,"bousai":845,"fukushi":846,"kenko":847,"kankyo":848,"gyosei":849,"sumai":850,"jinken":851},[17,30,527,187,109],[17,25,71,21,71],[17,66,61,71,19],[17,23,61,10,33],[17,39,33,37,26],[17,26,25,34,33],[17,24,30,37,23],[17,23,34,69,71],[17,39,26,24,39],[17,26,31,25,17],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":854,"name":855,"party":815,"photo_url":856,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":857,"top_topics":858,"summary":859,"evidence":860,"fields":861,"field_years":872},598,"桝 秀行","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn53_masu.jpg",645,[],"公共事業の契約・予算執行の透明性と根拠の明確化を問う質疑が記録の大部分を占める。学校改築工事の分割発注問題、契約金額の妥当性検証、入札不調の原因分析、随意契約のガイドライン整備といった行政手続きの具体的な課題について、数字や比較例を挙げながら執行部に説明責任を求める発言が顕著である。",[],{"machi":862,"bousai":863,"fukushi":864,"kosodate":865,"kenko":866,"kankyo":867,"keizai":868,"gyosei":869,"jinken":870,"sumai":871},[17,30,30,67,23],[17,25,71,134,23],[17,31,39,23,39],[17,36,756,669,21],[17,39,26,26,24],[17,19,33,33,39],[17,67,34,110,33],[17,88,91,366,37],[17,26,24,71,26],[17,23,31,39,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":874,"name":875,"party":876,"photo_url":877,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":878,"top_topics":879,"summary":880,"evidence":881,"fields":882,"field_years":893},586,"きもと 麻由","超党会派えどがわ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn89_kimoto.jpg",406,[],"区の施策全般にわたり、事業の具体的な内容・根拠・効果測定について質問する発言が多く記録されている。また、区民の負担や利便性、外国人・若年層・障害者など特定層への対応、デジタル施策の実装状況など、実務的かつ多角的な観点から行政サービスの課題を指摘する傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":883,"machi":884,"fukushi":885,"kankyo":886,"gyosei":887,"keizai":888,"kosodate":889,"kenko":890,"sumai":891,"jinken":892},[17,23,88,67,37],[17,25,59,28,88],[17,24,19,36,71],[17,24,34,67,71],[17,24,34,33,23],[17,39,28,67,71],[17,26,140,134,31],[17,26,31,31,26],[17,17,23,31,24],[17,17,71,30,39],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":895,"name":896,"party":876,"photo_url":897,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":898,"top_topics":899,"summary":900,"evidence":901,"fields":902,"field_years":913},548,"中野 ヘンリ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn93_nakano.jpg",320,[],"行政の事務・事業について数値根拠や具体的なデータを求める質問が多く記録されている。また、既存施策の課題や限界を指摘したうえで、改善案や代替案の検討を要望する発言が目立つ。さらに外国籍住民や災害対応、脱炭素目標達成など、地域課題に対する実装的・実効性を問う傾向が見られる。",[],{"machi":903,"kosodate":904,"bousai":905,"fukushi":906,"kenko":907,"kankyo":908,"keizai":909,"gyosei":910,"jinken":911,"sumai":912},[17,19,67,36,39],[17,21,115,115,28],[17,34,30,88,88],[17,25,19,39,23],[17,25,31,33,31],[17,71,18,30,71],[17,31,66,61,34],[17,39,28,66,31],[17,17,31,24,39],[17,17,24,26,31],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":621,"name":915,"party":876,"photo_url":916,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":917,"top_topics":918,"summary":919,"evidence":920,"fields":921,"field_years":932},"伊藤 ひとみ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn73_itou.jpg",781,[],"子育て支援・教育環境整備と環境・脱炭素施策に関わる質問が多く記録されている。また、住民からの声や地域ニーズの把握に基づき、具体的な改善要望や追加調査を求める発言が顕著である。同時に、情報公開・説明責任の充実を求める指摘が複数記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":922,"fukushi":923,"machi":924,"kankyo":925,"gyosei":926,"keizai":927,"bousai":928,"kenko":929,"jinken":930,"sumai":931},[17,805,445,254,192],[17,59,66,28,33],[17,61,21,88,31],[17,139,21,62,66],[17,37,19,23,26],[17,30,23,61,34],[17,36,144,144,37],[17,61,67,37,31],[17,19,34,34,25],[17,19,71,31,39],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":934,"name":935,"party":876,"photo_url":936,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":937,"top_topics":938,"summary":939,"evidence":940,"fields":941,"field_years":953},591,"本西 光枝","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn72_motonisi.jpg",818,[],"福祉・教育・防災・情報公開など多岐にわたる政策課題について、現状把握と制度の具体的な運用を問う質問が記録されている。制度設計の詳細確認や、対象者の実態に即した支援のあり方を追求する姿勢が多く見受けられる。",[],{"kankyo":942,"gyosei":943,"machi":944,"kosodate":946,"bousai":947,"jinken":948,"sumai":949,"fukushi":950,"keizai":951,"kenko":952},[17,36,10,28,25],[17,61,23,25,17],[17,134,21,945,61],78,[17,366,192,69,144],[17,300,117,192,37],[17,18,25,23,26],[17,31,34,34,19],[17,20,196,36,19],[17,21,67,25,33],[17,36,37,18,26],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":955,"name":956,"party":876,"photo_url":957,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":958,"top_topics":959,"summary":960,"evidence":961,"fields":962,"field_years":973},550,"田村 ひろし","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn92_tamura.jpg",635,[],"福祉・介護・防災・財政など広範な分野で詳細な質疑を行う議員。制度の矛盾点や事務処理上の問題を指摘する傾向が強く、特に生活保護・介護保険の運用実態、職員体制、公開情報のあり方について具体的な数値や事例を挙げた質問が記録されている。また、物価高による区民生活への影響と財政出動の必要性についての見方が複数の発言に表れている。",[],{"fukushi":963,"sumai":964,"kenko":965,"keizai":966,"kosodate":967,"kankyo":968,"bousai":969,"jinken":970,"gyosei":971,"machi":972},[17,297,109,300,67],[17,33,18,34,71],[17,88,36,19,39],[17,28,18,117,23],[17,33,66,337,37],[17,39,71,19,39],[17,28,134,67,31],[17,39,39,24,24],[17,88,36,59,31],[17,33,88,18,39],[44,45,46,47,48],{"member_id":975,"name":976,"party":876,"photo_url":977,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":978,"top_topics":979,"summary":980,"evidence":981,"fields":982,"field_years":993},676,"笹本 ひさし","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gikai.city.edogawa.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn76_sasamoto.jpg",375,[],"財政・都区制度・公共調達など行政制度の詳細な検証と改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。また、区内事業者支援・教育環境整備・防犯対策・地域振興など、地域課題の実現可能性を問う具体的な提案型の質問が特徴として読み取れる。",[],{"keizai":983,"machi":984,"gyosei":985,"fukushi":986,"kosodate":987,"kankyo":988,"sumai":989,"bousai":990,"jinken":991,"kenko":992},[17,18,196,117,24],[17,34,36,67,26],[17,37,69,136,39],[17,30,88,67,39],[17,134,186,138,31],[17,66,91,28,39],[17,24,26,19,24],[17,19,67,196,26],[17,31,23,23,26],[17,34,18,30,23],[44,45,46,47,48],1789179102599]