[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":1038},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fHrkSzrjDONNOBxOW2bJHRewdJyWD-LILjgA04HRBPIk":3},[4,50,81,107,128,157,182,206,238,261,284,316,336,358,384,409,433,454,478,499,523,544,565,589,612,634,655,682,705,726,747,769,790,810,830,852,872,892,913,933,953,976,998,1018],{"member_id":5,"name":6,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":11,"top_topics":12,"summary":13,"evidence":14,"fields":15,"field_years":44},551,"いがらし 学","公明党","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn111_igarashi_manabu.jpg",null,21,492,[],"地方自治体の予算・決算審議において、施策の具体的な数値根拠、事業の詳細内容、改善策の検討状況を問う質問が記録に多く見られる。安心安全・環境・交通・福祉など広範な分野にわたって、区民の利便性向上や防災対策の実効性確保を求める発言傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"machi":16,"fukushi":22,"bousai":26,"kosodate":29,"kenko":31,"kankyo":33,"keizai":37,"gyosei":39,"jinken":42,"sumai":43},[17,18,19,20,21],0,20,32,27,13,[17,23,24,25,24],4,3,5,[17,27,21,28,21],6,33,[17,23,27,30,18],41,[17,24,32,24,27],7,[17,34,10,35,36],8,14,11,[17,25,38,35,23],17,[17,24,23,40,41],2,1,[17,40,41,17,40],[17,25,24,27,40],[45,46,47,48,49],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":51,"name":52,"party":7,"photo_url":53,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":54,"top_topics":55,"summary":56,"evidence":57,"fields":58,"field_years":80},563,"いしだ 圭一郎","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn49_ishida_keiichirou.jpg",438,[],"施設の収容能力・事業の根拠データ・予算積算根拠など、行政施策の具体的な数値や仕組みについて詳細な確認を求める発言が多く記録されている。また、先進事例の紹介や他区との比較、DX導入やデータ活用による業務改善提案も複数見られる。",[],{"machi":59,"kosodate":64,"kankyo":68,"keizai":70,"gyosei":73,"fukushi":75,"kenko":76,"bousai":77,"jinken":78,"sumai":79},[17,60,61,62,63],43,23,19,48,[17,65,32,66,67],25,9,16,[17,69,27,66,69],10,[17,71,72,27,18],15,22,[17,25,74,67,66],12,[17,36,66,74,66],[17,66,23,32,27],[17,40,34,24,69],[17,41,24,41,17],[17,23,23,41,74],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":82,"name":83,"party":7,"photo_url":84,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":85,"top_topics":86,"summary":87,"evidence":88,"fields":89,"field_years":106},639,"さかまき 常行","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn97_sakamaki_tsuneyuki_.jpg",443,[],"産業振興・経済活性化と福祉・生活支援の複数分野にわたり、施策の具体的実装と効果測定を重視する質問傾向が記録されている。行政手続のDX推進や既存施設の機能拡充など、段階的な改善を念頭に置いた詳細な質問が多い。",[],{"kosodate":90,"keizai":92,"gyosei":96,"fukushi":97,"machi":99,"kenko":101,"kankyo":102,"sumai":103,"bousai":104,"jinken":105},[17,91,71,24,41],28,[17,93,36,94,95],29,36,35,[17,10,62,24,41],[17,91,98,40,32],31,[17,91,100,61,61],30,[17,66,38,40,25],[17,71,34,74,74],[17,40,25,24,24],[17,21,38,25,34],[17,40,17,23,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":108,"name":109,"party":7,"photo_url":110,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":111,"top_topics":112,"summary":113,"evidence":114,"fields":115,"field_years":127},655,"しば 佳代子","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn20_shiba_kayoko.jpg",692,[],"地域の実情把握と改善提案を軸とした質疑が記録されている。住民からの具体的な声（電話がつながらない、お店がない等）を起点に、事業の効果測定や拡大の可能性を問う発言が多い。また障害者支援、子育て支援、地域活性化など、複数の施策領域で「予防」「早期発見」「連携」の重要性を指摘する発言が記録されている。",[],{"kenko":116,"machi":117,"kosodate":119,"fukushi":120,"keizai":121,"bousai":122,"kankyo":123,"gyosei":124,"jinken":125,"sumai":126},[17,10,27,34,18],[17,65,65,18,118],38,[17,35,91,65,18],[17,66,66,18,94],[17,67,34,25,32],[17,66,66,32,24],[17,32,32,25,32],[17,66,32,66,25],[17,32,24,36,25],[17,24,41,40,36],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":129,"name":130,"party":7,"photo_url":131,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":132,"top_topics":133,"summary":134,"evidence":135,"fields":136,"field_years":156},706,"わたなべ 一美","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn110_watanabe_kazumi.jpg",757,[],"福祉・子育て・防災・健康増進など多岐にわたる行政課題について、現状把握と制度の実効性を問う質問が記録されている。特に制度の「隙間」や「認知度の低さ」に着目し、支援対象の実態調査、関連機関との連携体制、周知啓発の強化を繰り返し求める発言の記録が多い。",[],{"bousai":137,"fukushi":140,"kenko":143,"machi":145,"sumai":148,"keizai":149,"kosodate":150,"gyosei":153,"kankyo":154,"jinken":155},[17,36,138,139,71],47,50,[17,10,141,65,142],34,18,[17,67,144,100,40],46,[17,36,146,147,100],37,40,[17,40,25,27,34],[17,40,67,62,36],[17,23,151,152,18],68,75,[17,40,66,61,25],[17,41,74,91,69],[17,41,32,35,66],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":158,"name":159,"party":7,"photo_url":160,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":161,"top_topics":162,"summary":163,"evidence":164,"fields":165,"field_years":181},652,"実正 やすゆき","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn112_jissyou_yasuyuki.jpg",820,[],"待機児童・保育サービス、防犯・道路安全管理、学校教育環境の改善など、区民生活に関わる具体的課題について質問・指摘する発言が多く記録されている。各施策の実効性や事業評価、関係機関の責任分担、今後の計画について確認・改善を求める内容が中心である。",[],{"fukushi":166,"kosodate":167,"bousai":170,"kenko":172,"machi":173,"kankyo":175,"keizai":176,"jinken":178,"sumai":179,"gyosei":180},[17,25,93,35,34],[17,168,169,100,32],44,56,[17,25,72,171,74],49,[17,24,71,74,23],[17,34,38,174,169],80,[17,25,25,100,69],[17,23,177,38,36],24,[17,25,41,66,24],[17,40,27,21,74],[17,24,74,62,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":183,"name":184,"party":7,"photo_url":185,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":186,"top_topics":187,"summary":188,"evidence":189,"fields":190,"field_years":205},674,"寺田 ひろし","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn101_terada_hiroshi.jpg",921,[],"行政各部門の具体的な施策・制度設計について細部の確認と質問を重ねる発言が多く記録されている。政策の仕組みや根拠、他自治体との比較、対象者数や予算額などの数値の妥当性を丁寧に問う質問が顕著であり、区民サービスの実装段階での課題抽出と改善提案を指向する傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"machi":191,"gyosei":195,"keizai":196,"kankyo":197,"fukushi":198,"kenko":200,"sumai":201,"kosodate":202,"bousai":203,"jinken":204},[17,192,139,193,194],73,59,42,[17,62,71,63,72],[17,141,146,98,18],[17,91,72,74,74],[17,20,199,61,18],26,[17,74,65,32,69],[17,21,27,24,25],[17,10,28,98,28],[17,35,19,36,35],[17,40,41,21,74],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":207,"name":208,"party":7,"photo_url":209,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":210,"top_topics":211,"summary":212,"evidence":213,"fields":214,"field_years":237},623,"小林 おとみ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn14_kobayashi_otomi.jpg",1725,[],"予算編成・事業運営の詳細な数値検証と、教育・福祉施設の計画策定プロセスの透明性向上を求める発言が多く記録されている。行政判断の根拠や基準の明確化、事業評価における問題点の洗い出しを重視する姿勢が読み取れる。",[],{"machi":215,"kosodate":219,"kenko":224,"sumai":227,"bousai":228,"gyosei":229,"keizai":230,"fukushi":232,"jinken":235,"kankyo":236},[17,151,216,217,218],78,94,66,[17,220,221,222,223],211,297,125,64,[17,35,62,225,226],55,53,[17,21,32,35,69],[17,38,18,91,67],[17,18,100,141,21],[17,61,118,231,61],45,[17,62,65,233,234],84,92,[17,32,34,27,40],[17,91,141,36,40],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":239,"name":240,"party":7,"photo_url":241,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":242,"top_topics":243,"summary":244,"evidence":245,"fields":246,"field_years":260},686,"成島 ゆかり","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn34_narushima_yukari.JPG",527,[],"福祉・子育て・介護・健康分野における細部の事業内容を確認する質疑が多く記録されている。予算や決算の数値根拠、施設の具体的な状況把握、事業の詳細な内訳について、所管部門に対して詳細説明を求める発言が特徴的である。また、先行事例の視察報告に基づき、事業の拡充や対象拡大を提案する発言が複数記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":247,"kenko":249,"machi":251,"gyosei":252,"keizai":253,"bousai":254,"kosodate":255,"kankyo":257,"jinken":258,"sumai":259},[17,248,72,25,23],61,[17,250,65,71,27],58,[17,30,18,18,69],[17,69,69,35,24],[17,35,66,21,69],[17,66,34,27,25],[17,28,36,256,94],62,[17,36,67,69,66],[17,23,41,23,40],[17,41,17,40,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":262,"name":263,"party":7,"photo_url":264,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":265,"top_topics":266,"summary":267,"evidence":268,"fields":269,"field_years":283},660,"鈴木 こうすけ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn22_suzuki_kousuke.jpg",533,[],"地域課題や日常生活の実感に基づいた質問を重ねる傾向が記録されている。施策の具体的な運用方法や制度設計の細部を掘り下げ、区民の困難や利便性の向上に結びつく改善案を提示する発言が多い。",[],{"kosodate":270,"machi":272,"kankyo":275,"gyosei":276,"kenko":277,"bousai":278,"keizai":279,"fukushi":280,"sumai":281,"jinken":282},[17,271,144,18,23],70,[17,93,273,274,69],88,90,[17,199,62,20,40],[17,34,25,74,40],[17,35,32,71,40],[17,69,91,72,24],[17,71,71,93,32],[17,32,34,38,23],[17,23,38,147,41],[17,17,40,66,23],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":285,"name":286,"party":287,"photo_url":288,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":289,"top_topics":290,"summary":291,"evidence":292,"fields":293,"field_years":315},574,"いわい 桐子","共産党","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn5_iwai_kiriko.jpg",2784,[],"福祉・介護・障がい者支援など社会保障分野における行政の実施体制・運用・説明責任に関する質問が多く記録されている。窓口統一化や組織改編時の利用者影響、職員配置の充足状況、施設整備計画の住民参加プロセス、給付金・保険料負担の実態に基づいた検証など、制度設計段階から実務レベルまで、行政の具体的な対応内容を確認する形の発言が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":294,"kosodate":298,"jinken":300,"machi":301,"keizai":306,"kenko":308,"gyosei":310,"kankyo":311,"bousai":312,"sumai":313},[17,295,296,297,18],216,181,74,[17,299,216,250,199],63,[17,23,18,67,40],[17,302,303,304,305],103,107,169,188,[17,307,192,138,28],81,[17,222,309,19,40],105,[17,28,299,63,21],[17,66,35,177,142],[17,36,199,62,36],[17,69,38,314,30],51,[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":317,"name":318,"party":287,"photo_url":319,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":320,"top_topics":321,"summary":322,"evidence":323,"fields":324,"field_years":335},599,"おなだか 勝","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn9_onadaka_masaru_.jpg",521,[],"予算・財政や教育施設・職員配置に関する詳細な質問が記録に多く残されており、数字の根拠や制度設計の具体的な説明を求める傾向が見られる。また、議会運営や情報公開のあり方について意見を述べ、改善案を提案する発言が複数記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":325,"keizai":326,"gyosei":327,"machi":328,"kankyo":329,"bousai":330,"fukushi":331,"jinken":332,"kenko":333,"sumai":334},[17,93,94,118,71],[17,21,177,23,23],[17,38,194,66,40],[17,38,147,10,74],[17,32,27,35,24],[17,23,23,23,24],[17,27,23,36,25],[17,40,40,41,40],[17,34,24,66,40],[17,41,40,40,23],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":337,"name":338,"party":287,"photo_url":339,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":340,"top_topics":341,"summary":342,"evidence":343,"fields":344,"field_years":357},628,"小柳 しげる","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn116_koyanagi_shigeru.jpg",1771,[],"予算・条例審議では制度設計の論理的一貫性や説明資料の過不足を指摘する質問が多く記録されている。労働環境・福祉・教育政策では対象範囲の拡充や支援の充実を求める発言が残されている。また、政策決定プロセスの透明性や根拠資料の完全開示を重視する姿勢が複数の質疑から読み取れる。",[],{"gyosei":345,"fukushi":346,"keizai":347,"kosodate":348,"kankyo":350,"machi":351,"kenko":353,"sumai":354,"bousai":355,"jinken":356},[17,72,61,35,40],[17,20,98,10,34],[17,142,177,231,74],[17,95,349,222,36],161,[17,21,65,98,142],[17,65,138,352,234],165,[17,67,74,69,32],[17,32,74,30,98],[17,34,65,61,62],[17,36,34,69,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":359,"name":360,"party":287,"photo_url":361,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":362,"top_topics":363,"summary":364,"evidence":365,"fields":366,"field_years":383},698,"山内 えり","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn44_yamauti.jpg",1707,[],"行政の施策・予算決定に関する詳細な数値確認と根拠の質問が記録されており、事業者支援、公共施設の利用負担率、避難所運営、公園管理など、区民生活に関わる具体的な施策について現況把握と改善案の提示を求める発言が多い。また、国の制度変更（保険証廃止、コロナ対応の縮小など）に対して区民への影響を懸念し、区として対抗措置を求める発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":367,"machi":368,"fukushi":371,"sumai":373,"kosodate":375,"kenko":376,"gyosei":377,"keizai":378,"kankyo":379,"jinken":382},[17,95,256,38,62],[17,369,370,223,100],206,145,[17,372,177,95,20],65,[17,374,250,177,66],83,[17,93,63,60,18],[17,141,18,147,142],[17,10,25,72,38],[17,19,60,152,98],[17,21,380,381,177],39,57,[17,24,27,69,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":385,"name":386,"party":287,"photo_url":387,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":388,"top_topics":389,"summary":390,"evidence":391,"fields":392,"field_years":408},559,"石川 すみえ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn93_ishikawa_sumie.jpg",1699,[],"福祉・保育・教育・防災など多分野にわたり、制度設計の矛盾点や運用上の課題を具体的に指摘する発言が記録されている。個別事例から制度全体の問題へと論を広げ、改善策や代替案を伴う質問を繰り返す傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":393,"fukushi":394,"machi":396,"keizai":397,"kenko":398,"kankyo":400,"kosodate":401,"gyosei":405,"sumai":406,"jinken":407},[17,30,118,74,21],[17,168,395,248,94],98,[17,63,138,216,63],[17,19,10,139,100],[17,93,399,381,65],96,[17,35,24,62,36],[17,402,314,403,404],205,302,201,[17,71,72,142,62],[17,23,24,32,40],[17,40,23,27,25],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":410,"name":411,"party":287,"photo_url":412,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":413,"top_topics":414,"summary":415,"evidence":416,"fields":417,"field_years":432},547,"荒川 なお","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn1_arakawa_nao.jpg",1483,[],"区の施策に対し、具体的な実施状況・根拠・効果測定を繰り返し質問する傾向が記録されている。また、個別事例から全体計画への接続不足、住民合意形成の不十分さ、実行スケジュールの遅延を指摘する発言が多い。",[],{"kosodate":418,"machi":420,"kankyo":424,"sumai":425,"keizai":426,"bousai":427,"fukushi":428,"jinken":429,"kenko":430,"gyosei":431},[17,28,194,419,93],87,[17,421,422,423,95],86,152,111,[17,194,95,38,36],[17,10,139,19,25],[17,168,94,193,199],[17,67,94,141,18],[17,71,19,30,100],[17,40,36,93,71],[17,18,10,67,34],[17,142,32,91,21],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":434,"name":435,"party":436,"photo_url":437,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":438,"top_topics":439,"summary":440,"evidence":441,"fields":442,"field_years":453},647,"しいな ひろみ","参政党","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn98_shiina_hiromi.jpg",924,[],"介護保険制度・障害福祉・高齢者施策を中心に、制度の実態把握と利用者視点の改善を求める質問が記録されている。同時に、情報周知の不足、事務手続きの簡素化、現場職員の実態把握を課題として指摘する発言が多く見られる。",[],{"kankyo":443,"machi":444,"fukushi":445,"kenko":446,"kosodate":447,"keizai":448,"gyosei":449,"bousai":450,"sumai":451,"jinken":452},[17,142,10,71,69],[17,72,62,98,142],[17,234,372,152,225],[17,380,118,194,100],[17,67,100,94,93],[17,142,142,71,27],[17,74,34,36,40],[17,34,32,69,21],[17,23,24,34,25],[17,40,40,24,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":455,"name":456,"party":436,"photo_url":457,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":458,"top_topics":459,"summary":460,"evidence":461,"fields":462,"field_years":477},680,"中妻 じょうた","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn30_img_96721_1_3_thumb.jpg",948,[],"数値や根拠に基づいた説明責任を繰り返し問う発言が多く、計画策定の時間的効率性や具体的な成果達成を求める傾向が記録されている。また福祉・保健・防災・まちづくり等の幅広い分野について、区の取り組み内容や数値目標の裏付けについて質問を重ねている。",[],{"machi":463,"kankyo":466,"kosodate":467,"fukushi":469,"keizai":471,"gyosei":472,"kenko":473,"bousai":474,"sumai":475,"jinken":476},[17,374,464,465,63],135,128,[17,177,36,93,32],[17,93,20,468,299],146,[17,470,299,10,74],69,[17,94,61,91,18],[17,62,62,66,23],[17,144,171,67,32],[17,21,18,72,23],[17,62,19,118,74],[17,40,41,36,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":479,"name":480,"party":436,"photo_url":481,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":482,"top_topics":483,"summary":484,"evidence":485,"fields":486,"field_years":498},594,"大森 大","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn117_oomori_dai.jpg",973,[],"行政の実行性・効率性や民間活用の可能性を指摘する発言が多く記録されている。また、福祉・防災・教育など複数分野にわたり、統計データや実態把握に基づく質問が記録されている。地方自治体の自立と事業の廃止判断の厳格化を主張する発言も見られる。",[],{"kosodate":487,"keizai":489,"gyosei":490,"fukushi":491,"kenko":492,"machi":493,"jinken":494,"bousai":495,"kankyo":496,"sumai":497},[17,94,18,488,381],112,[17,71,71,98,40],[17,74,18,36,24],[17,199,62,21,27],[17,36,69,27,27],[17,380,151,174,61],[17,27,40,36,23],[17,71,61,71,24],[17,25,32,62,32],[17,41,66,36,40],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":500,"name":501,"party":502,"photo_url":503,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":504,"top_topics":505,"summary":506,"evidence":507,"fields":508,"field_years":522},555,"五十嵐 やす子","日本維新の会","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn2_igarashi.jpg",1016,[],"災害対策・子育て支援・教育現場の実態把握を重視し、施策の具体的な課題や現場との乖離を問う発言が多い。区民や現場職員の声を聞くプロセスの重要性を繰り返し指摘し、計画策定時の情報公開・合意形成のあり方に疑問を呈する傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":509,"kosodate":510,"machi":512,"jinken":515,"kenko":516,"bousai":517,"kankyo":518,"keizai":519,"gyosei":520,"sumai":521},[17,146,98,218,168],[17,511,423,168,93],215,[17,513,419,514,271],171,123,[17,93,74,36,34],[17,98,65,30,199],[17,141,91,171,98],[17,168,95,61,66],[17,62,34,35,62],[17,74,25,32,32],[17,35,142,35,34],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":524,"name":525,"party":526,"photo_url":527,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":528,"top_topics":529,"summary":530,"evidence":531,"fields":532,"field_years":543},644,"佐々木 としたか","板橋区議会議","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn17_Gn17_sasaki_toshitaka_2019_R.jpg",448,[],"財政・制度改革と行政運営の課題を中心に質問が集中している。都区間の財源配分不均等、公共施設の老朽化対策、技術職員の人員確保、委託業者のリスク管理など、区の構造的な問題の改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。また、資料の精度、情報公開の透明性、職員研修の実効性についても指摘を重ねている。",[],{"keizai":533,"machi":534,"fukushi":535,"kenko":536,"kankyo":537,"sumai":538,"kosodate":539,"bousai":540,"gyosei":541,"jinken":542},[17,35,69,67,23],[17,250,194,271,72],[17,95,34,38,34],[17,100,25,71,23],[17,35,74,34,40],[17,34,24,23,17],[17,91,36,61,69],[17,69,21,35,34],[17,71,142,20,34],[17,24,41,142,40],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":545,"name":546,"party":547,"photo_url":548,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":549,"top_topics":550,"summary":551,"evidence":552,"fields":553,"field_years":564},663,"田中 いさお","田中いさお","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn26_Gn26_tanaka_isao_2019.jpg",560,[],"災害対策・防災、高齢者福祉、公園・緑化、建築安全など複数分野にわたり、現場での具体的事例を引きながら区の施策の実行性や整備状況を詳しく質問する発言が記録されている。事業内容の曖昧さや計画と実績の乖離、弱者への配慮不足を指摘し、条例制定や予算措置による体制強化を繰り返し求める立場が示されている。",[],{"bousai":554,"kenko":555,"sumai":556,"fukushi":557,"kosodate":558,"machi":559,"gyosei":560,"keizai":561,"kankyo":562,"jinken":563},[17,61,139,60,74],[17,34,62,177,24],[17,34,34,72,23],[17,74,142,72,23],[17,194,66,142,27],[17,28,271,223,28],[17,25,32,25,40],[17,34,38,61,25],[17,25,66,74,23],[17,41,24,24,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":566,"name":567,"party":568,"photo_url":569,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":570,"top_topics":571,"summary":572,"evidence":573,"fields":574,"field_years":588},667,"田中 しゅんすけ","田中しゅんすけ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn27_tanaka.jpg",1899,[],"行政の制度・施策について詳細な確認・質問を行い、背景や理由、財源、具体的な数字を丹念に問う傾向が記録されている。同時に、事業の実効性や対象者への周知・アクセスの課題を指摘し、改善案の提示や関係部署との連携強化を要望する発言が多い。",[],{"machi":575,"kankyo":577,"kosodate":578,"keizai":579,"gyosei":580,"fukushi":581,"bousai":584,"kenko":585,"sumai":586,"jinken":587},[17,118,231,576,217],137,[17,10,177,60,20],[17,65,62,297,30],[17,74,38,138,65],[17,35,27,226,28],[17,30,60,582,583],89,60,[17,74,74,314,91],[17,139,231,174,63],[17,23,25,36,36],[17,40,41,66,35],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":590,"name":591,"party":592,"photo_url":593,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":594,"top_topics":595,"summary":596,"evidence":597,"fields":598,"field_years":611},635,"坂田 れい子","社民党","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn120_sakata_reiko.jpg",1226,[],"新型コロナワクチンの安全性・有効性に対する疑問と被害救済への懸念を繰り返し提起し、行政の施策妥当性や予算執行プロセスの透明性について詳細な質問を行う姿勢が記録されている。同時に、外国人支援・福祉施設運営・教育施策など広範な分野で、制度設計の実効性や情報周知の課題を指摘する質問が多数記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":599,"kankyo":601,"kenko":602,"machi":604,"keizai":605,"bousai":606,"gyosei":607,"sumai":608,"jinken":609,"fukushi":610},[17,72,118,600,169],95,[17,35,62,100,35],[17,36,314,603,72],67,[17,72,94,470,72],[17,72,147,139,21],[17,34,67,141,62],[17,36,74,139,62],[17,27,24,24,25],[17,25,67,380,21],[17,40,147,118,23],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":613,"name":614,"party":615,"photo_url":616,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":617,"top_topics":618,"summary":619,"evidence":620,"fields":621,"field_years":633},606,"おばた 健太郎","立憲民主党","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn95_Gn95_obata_kenichirou_2019_R.jpg",1165,[],"行政の制度設計や事業実施の詳細・根拠・効果検証について具体的な質問を重ねる傾向が記録されている。数値基準の妥当性、情報公開・広報の方法、複数部局にまたがる施策の連携状況など、運用面の細部を問うことが多い。",[],{"bousai":622,"machi":623,"gyosei":625,"keizai":626,"kankyo":627,"kosodate":628,"sumai":629,"kenko":630,"fukushi":631,"jinken":632},[17,61,91,62,67],[17,226,223,624,299],101,[17,18,36,71,24],[17,20,91,69,66],[17,61,61,38,36],[17,91,94,62,20],[17,34,67,62,36],[17,94,71,69,32],[17,35,38,74,25],[17,40,36,27,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":635,"name":636,"party":615,"photo_url":637,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":638,"top_topics":639,"summary":640,"evidence":641,"fields":642,"field_years":654},620,"くまだ 智子","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn114_kumada_tomoko.jpg",907,[],"教育・福祉・保健衛生など多岐の分野で、施策の詳細な根拠・対象範囲・実施方法を確認する質問が記録されている。制度設計の不明確な点や対象者の把握状況、他自治体事例との比較に基づく質問が多く、現場実態との乖離を指摘する発言が見られる。",[],{"bousai":643,"keizai":644,"gyosei":645,"kosodate":646,"kankyo":648,"machi":649,"jinken":650,"fukushi":651,"kenko":652,"sumai":653},[17,36,67,32,34],[17,66,142,60,168],[17,25,71,34,21],[17,302,647,225,91],114,[17,32,32,91,21],[17,177,271,273,138],[17,24,40,23,24],[17,24,138,28,34],[17,32,256,146,24],[17,41,25,25,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":656,"name":657,"party":615,"photo_url":658,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":659,"top_topics":660,"summary":661,"evidence":662,"fields":663,"field_years":681},571,"井上 温子","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn4_inoue_atsuko.jpg",1923,[],"福祉・教育・子ども関連の施策について、事業の実効性・対象者への届き具合・長期的支援体制を問う質問が多く記録されている。数値根拠の提示を求め、計画や事業報告の課題・成果の具体性不足を指摘する発言が目立つ。",[],{"fukushi":664,"kosodate":666,"machi":670,"gyosei":674,"kenko":675,"kankyo":676,"keizai":677,"bousai":678,"jinken":679,"sumai":680},[17,303,488,665,399],138,[17,667,668,669,419],293,209,102,[17,671,647,672,673],121,110,162,[17,38,62,141,74],[17,314,20,256,141],[17,30,94,177,100],[17,93,28,61,95],[17,23,62,71,66],[17,32,199,18,36],[17,66,36,69,72],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":683,"name":684,"party":615,"photo_url":685,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":686,"top_topics":687,"summary":688,"evidence":689,"fields":690,"field_years":704},590,"大野 ゆか","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn119_oono_yuka.jpg",1192,[],"子どもの権利や福祉・居場所づくりに関する施策について詳細な質問が記録されている。区の事業や計画に対して、具体的な数値確認や実装方法、対象者への周知方法を問う発言が多く、区民への情報提供の丁寧さや実現可能性を指摘する傾向が見られる。",[],{"machi":691,"keizai":693,"kosodate":694,"sumai":697,"fukushi":698,"jinken":699,"bousai":700,"gyosei":701,"kankyo":702,"kenko":703},[17,216,692,669,10],134,[17,71,94,10,74],[17,10,138,695,696],203,99,[17,91,93,10,25],[17,36,27,38,21],[17,40,24,41,41],[17,142,20,199,36],[17,32,34,74,23],[17,27,38,141,34],[17,27,32,34,71],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":706,"name":707,"party":615,"photo_url":708,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":709,"top_topics":710,"summary":711,"evidence":712,"fields":713,"field_years":725},603,"小野 ゆりこ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn118_ono_yuriko.jpg",898,[],"区の行政手続やインフラ整備、福祉事業等の具体的内容について、複数の質問を通じて事業の詳細や根拠を確認する発言が記録されている。また、先進事例の導入検討や事業の効率化・透明性向上を求める提案が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":714,"keizai":715,"gyosei":716,"machi":717,"fukushi":719,"sumai":720,"jinken":721,"kankyo":722,"bousai":723,"kenko":724},[17,34,177,62,38],[17,74,20,139,118],[17,69,62,38,74],[17,30,718,146,171],97,[17,27,177,38,69],[17,36,38,34,35],[17,41,27,41,17],[17,69,194,72,100],[17,36,93,71,142],[17,41,38,27,23],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":727,"name":728,"party":615,"photo_url":729,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":730,"top_topics":731,"summary":732,"evidence":733,"fields":734,"field_years":746},578,"岩永 きりん","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn115_iwanaga_kirin.jpg",1318,[],"行政施策や事業の詳細な実態把握を重視する姿勢が記録されている。数値データの確認、事業効果の測定方法、制度設計の背景や理由を問う質問が多く、政策の運用状況や改善点について体系的に掘り下げる傾向が見られる。",[],{"machi":735,"kosodate":736,"keizai":738,"kenko":739,"kankyo":740,"bousai":741,"fukushi":742,"jinken":743,"sumai":744,"gyosei":745},[17,118,95,307,98],[17,25,718,737,36],129,[17,141,10,248,40],[17,25,36,66,23],[17,38,141,142,32],[17,74,36,142,35],[17,40,34,199,32],[17,34,23,93,66],[17,23,25,23,23],[17,32,71,194,32],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":748,"name":749,"party":750,"photo_url":751,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":752,"top_topics":753,"summary":754,"evidence":755,"fields":756,"field_years":768},689,"ひはら みちこ","自民党","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn109_hihara_michiko.jpg",896,[],"都市計画・防災・福祉など多岐にわたる行政課題について、施策の実効性・具体的運用・他部署連携を重視した質問が記録されている。計画段階での調査分析、訓練による検証、庁内外の関係機関との事前協議を求める発言が特徴的である。",[],{"bousai":757,"fukushi":758,"machi":759,"keizai":761,"gyosei":762,"kosodate":763,"kenko":764,"kankyo":765,"jinken":766,"sumai":767},[17,194,256,18,66],[17,24,66,138,98],[17,61,488,760,20],91,[17,10,28,177,35],[17,23,66,142,67],[17,74,71,10,10],[17,25,36,65,20],[17,69,62,71,21],[17,40,24,23,41],[17,40,38,69,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":770,"name":771,"party":750,"photo_url":772,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":773,"top_topics":774,"summary":775,"evidence":776,"fields":777,"field_years":789},567,"一島 ひろし","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn106_ichishima_hiroshi.jpg",796,[],"福祉・教育・防災など幅広い分野で詳細な質問を記録する。行政施策の具体的な数値目標・実績・運用方法を確認する傾向が強く、制度設計の不整合や対象範囲の狭さを指摘する発言が多く記録されている。陳情審査では会派方針に基づいた不採択主張を複数記録している。",[],{"fukushi":778,"kosodate":779,"machi":780,"kenko":782,"bousai":783,"kankyo":784,"keizai":785,"jinken":786,"gyosei":787,"sumai":788},[17,118,169,65,66],[17,61,307,600,66],[17,67,781,139,10],54,[17,72,93,69,23],[17,41,62,138,24],[17,23,61,67,23],[17,24,74,38,36],[17,40,41,25,25],[17,27,61,177,34],[17,41,23,35,17],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":791,"name":792,"party":750,"photo_url":793,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":794,"top_topics":795,"summary":796,"evidence":797,"fields":798,"field_years":809},683,"中村 とらあき","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn32_nakamura_toraaki.jpg",656,[],"行政手続き・制度設計の詳細と関連法令の整合性を重視する発言が記録されている。委員会制度の運用ルール、公共施設のファシリティマネジメント、財源の明確化など、制度的な基盤や説明責任を丁寧に掘り下げることが特徴的である。",[],{"fukushi":799,"kosodate":800,"kankyo":801,"keizai":802,"machi":803,"bousai":804,"kenko":805,"gyosei":806,"sumai":807,"jinken":808},[17,61,62,34,24],[17,223,65,146,27],[17,74,40,71,66],[17,27,69,95,21],[17,72,72,194,142],[17,27,66,67,36],[17,71,23,62,25],[17,66,199,62,23],[17,24,23,34,32],[17,40,27,32,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":811,"name":812,"party":750,"photo_url":813,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":814,"top_topics":815,"summary":816,"evidence":817,"fields":818,"field_years":829},695,"元山 芳行","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn42_motoyama_yoshiyuki.jpg",528,[],"事業評価の在り方・データ活用・デジタルトランスフォーメーションを一貫したテーマとして繰り返し質問する記録が多い。アウトカム設定の不明確さ、行政評価制度の改善、データに基づく施策設計の必要性を指摘し続けており、こうした業務改革的な視点から行政運営全般に対する質疑が展開されている。",[],{"fukushi":819,"kosodate":820,"machi":821,"keizai":822,"gyosei":823,"kenko":824,"kankyo":825,"sumai":826,"bousai":827,"jinken":828},[17,63,18,23,69],[17,38,38,36,38],[17,470,19,98,19],[17,38,10,20,141],[17,147,98,10,20],[17,95,10,25,25],[17,18,71,66,18],[17,24,24,24,24],[17,35,23,25,23],[17,41,24,24,25],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":831,"name":832,"party":750,"photo_url":833,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":834,"top_topics":835,"summary":836,"evidence":837,"fields":838,"field_years":851},584,"内田 けんいちろう","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn94_Gn94_uchida_kenichirou.jpg",1011,[],"予算・施策の詳細な根拠と目的を確認する質問が記録に多く見られる。事業の有効性検証、数値基準の明確化、地域特性の反映、長期的な継続性といった観点から、既存の説明内容に対して掘り下げた質疑を行う傾向が記録されている。",[],{"machi":839,"kankyo":842,"kosodate":843,"gyosei":844,"keizai":845,"sumai":846,"bousai":847,"kenko":848,"fukushi":849,"jinken":850},[17,840,841,299,141],143,108,[17,177,10,62,62],[17,67,69,380,696],[17,10,34,21,146],[17,20,27,36,38],[17,177,65,71,25],[17,380,65,36,71],[17,62,24,32,41],[17,20,25,21,34],[17,41,40,23,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":853,"name":854,"party":750,"photo_url":855,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":856,"top_topics":857,"summary":858,"evidence":859,"fields":860,"field_years":871},587,"大野 治彦","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn8_oono_haruhiko.jpg",390,[],"予算編成過程の細部・数字根拠や事業の具体的効果を問う質問が多く記録されており、また防災・農業・環境等の政策課題について経年的な改善状況や実行体制の整備を確認する発言が目立つ。行政事務の運用ルール・法令遵守や、庁内連携・住民との関係構築のあり方についても指摘が多い。",[],{"bousai":861,"kankyo":862,"keizai":863,"fukushi":864,"machi":865,"gyosei":866,"sumai":867,"kosodate":868,"kenko":869,"jinken":870},[17,91,65,74,23],[17,93,34,74,41],[17,36,36,34,41],[17,66,27,32,41],[17,194,67,250,98],[17,35,25,35,17],[17,23,41,23,24],[17,69,142,27,41],[17,36,41,24,40],[17,17,17,40,17],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":873,"name":874,"party":750,"photo_url":875,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":876,"top_topics":877,"summary":878,"evidence":879,"fields":880,"field_years":891},701,"山田 たかゆき","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn45_yamada_takayuki.jpg",741,[],"議案の細部や制度設計について具体的な質問を重ねることが記録に多い。政策の実装段階における仕組みや数値、対象者の定義、庁内体制の明確化を問う発言が多く見られ、概括的な政策方針よりも行政実務の詳細に着目する傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"kosodate":881,"machi":882,"kankyo":883,"fukushi":884,"keizai":885,"gyosei":886,"bousai":887,"sumai":888,"kenko":889,"jinken":890},[17,20,139,28,118],[17,63,174,168,100],[17,36,231,25,69],[17,27,10,226,100],[17,67,71,74,66],[17,35,21,21,71],[17,25,72,32,32],[17,25,23,23,17],[17,27,67,60,62],[17,25,40,24,41],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":893,"name":894,"party":750,"photo_url":895,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":896,"top_topics":897,"summary":898,"evidence":899,"fields":900,"field_years":912},610,"川口 雅敏","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn12_kawaguchi.jpg",670,[],"予算編成・施設運営・教育施策など広範な行政課題について、数値根拠や具体的効果を確認する質問が記録されている。また、区民への情報提供方法や計画策定プロセスの透明性について、実施方法や事前説明の必要性を問う発言が多く見られる。",[],{"machi":901,"fukushi":902,"kosodate":903,"sumai":905,"gyosei":906,"kenko":907,"keizai":908,"kankyo":909,"jinken":910,"bousai":911},[17,61,93,174,781],[17,27,40,69,27],[17,23,273,904,38],71,[17,40,40,21,69],[17,71,66,177,34],[17,23,69,66,24],[17,71,34,36,18],[17,21,23,34,25],[17,40,41,40,40],[17,23,21,36,71],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":914,"name":915,"party":750,"photo_url":916,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":917,"top_topics":918,"summary":919,"evidence":920,"fields":921,"field_years":932},615,"木田 おりべ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn107_kida_oribe.jpg",905,[],"行政の個別事業の詳細な内容や数値根拠を質問する発言が記録されている。防災、環境・ごみ処理、スポーツ振興、都市整備など多分野にわたり、予算額の根拠や事業の具体的な実施方法、統計データの把握状況などについて確認を求める傾向が見られる。また、消防団活動への参加を明言した上で、災害対応や防災対策の在り方について提案的な質問をしている。",[],{"keizai":922,"kosodate":923,"machi":924,"bousai":925,"fukushi":926,"kenko":927,"gyosei":928,"kankyo":929,"sumai":930,"jinken":931},[17,74,147,100,35],[17,71,98,72,138],[17,171,274,841,603],[17,28,223,10,142],[17,27,32,24,74],[17,66,66,23,25],[17,142,94,21,34],[17,27,30,177,20],[17,24,23,32,27],[17,40,66,34,40],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":934,"name":935,"party":750,"photo_url":936,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":876,"top_topics":937,"summary":938,"evidence":939,"fields":940,"field_years":952},704,"横川 たかゆき","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn105_yokokawa_takayuki.jpg",[],"地域課題への具体的な調査・提案が多く記録されており、所管部署との詳細な質疑応答を通じて事業の実効性や予算配分を検証する傾向が見られる。区民や地域団体との連携強化、民間企業の活用、複数部署の横連携を求める発言が繰り返し記録されている。",[],{"machi":941,"kosodate":943,"keizai":944,"bousai":945,"kenko":946,"gyosei":947,"jinken":948,"kankyo":949,"fukushi":950,"sumai":951},[17,95,582,942,395],79,[17,781,470,30,147],[17,23,71,98,199],[17,25,35,71,67],[17,23,28,177,32],[17,25,67,66,25],[17,41,17,24,23],[17,27,21,199,65],[17,40,91,61,67],[17,17,25,24,21],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":954,"name":955,"party":750,"photo_url":956,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":957,"top_topics":958,"summary":959,"evidence":960,"fields":961,"field_years":975},671,"田中 やすのり","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn28_tanaka_yasunori.jpg",2432,[],"本発言記録は議長としての職務遂行の記録であり、議案・陳情の採否決定の宣告、委員会報告の聴取、会議の進行管理などが主要な内容を占めている。個別の政策的主張や立場を示す発言は記録に現れていない。",[],{"machi":962,"fukushi":966,"kosodate":967,"kenko":968,"sumai":969,"kankyo":970,"keizai":971,"bousai":972,"gyosei":973,"jinken":974},[17,963,964,965,34],120,186,93,[17,273,217,171,24],[17,942,234,380,24],[17,248,233,144,25],[17,18,65,66,24],[17,63,248,177,40],[17,146,60,62,40],[17,146,231,177,66],[17,139,152,118,24],[17,66,177,66,40],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":977,"name":978,"party":750,"photo_url":979,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":980,"top_topics":981,"summary":982,"evidence":983,"fields":984,"field_years":997},631,"近藤 タカヒロ","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn108_kondou_takahiro.jpg",1123,[],"行政施策の具体的な数値・進捗状況・実装スケジュール、および政策設計の根拠や比較可能性を問う質問が多く記録されている。施策の効果測定方法や、データの現況性・信頼性、複数主体間の調整状況に関する確認的な質問も繰り返され、政策立案プロセスの透明性や実効性に注目する傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":985,"kenko":987,"machi":988,"kankyo":990,"keizai":991,"bousai":992,"fukushi":993,"sumai":994,"jinken":995,"gyosei":996},[17,27,199,986,297],175,[17,23,21,69,24],[17,381,297,989,66],82,[17,32,62,28,69],[17,36,141,28,27],[17,74,177,226,34],[17,66,35,61,40],[17,69,177,36,25],[17,23,34,69,40],[17,21,199,19,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":999,"name":1000,"party":750,"photo_url":1001,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":1002,"top_topics":1003,"summary":1004,"evidence":1005,"fields":1006,"field_years":1017},677,"長瀬 達也","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn29_Gn29_nagase_tatsuya_2019.jpg",550,[],"行政の効率化・デジタル化推進と、その実施における実行性の詳細確認を重視する傾向が記録されている。オンライン決済・申請システム拡大、LED化による省エネ、ゼロカーボン施策などの施策導入に対して、「今後の具体的な見通し」「マンパワーの確保」「数値目標の達成見込み」といった実装段階の課題を繰り返し質問する発言が多い。また、財政効果の検証と区民への周知・利便性向上を同時に求める姿勢が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":1007,"kosodate":1008,"sumai":1009,"machi":1010,"keizai":1011,"kankyo":1012,"kenko":1013,"gyosei":1014,"bousai":1015,"jinken":1016},[17,142,35,74,23],[17,223,171,61,66],[17,32,24,34,41],[17,93,38,61,66],[17,93,21,72,27],[17,69,18,34,24],[17,21,35,66,25],[17,21,67,74,24],[17,36,32,36,23],[17,23,24,21,24],[45,46,47,48,49],{"member_id":111,"name":1019,"party":750,"photo_url":1020,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":1021,"top_topics":1022,"summary":1023,"evidence":1024,"fields":1025,"field_years":1037},"間中 りんぺい","https:\u002F\u002Fitabashi.gijiroku.com\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn41_Gn41_manaka_rinpei_2019_R_R.jpg",522,[],"区政の各分野にわたり、具体的な数字・事例・先進事例との比較に基づいた質疑が多く記録されている。施策の目的と実装のズレ、制度の運用課題、区民の実感とのギャップを指摘する発言が顕著。記録から読み取れる関心領域は、福祉・子育て・まちづくり・文化・防災・産業振興など多岐にわたり、いずれも「現場の声」「利用者側の視点」を踏まえた検証姿勢が伺える。",[],{"machi":1026,"kenko":1028,"bousai":1029,"jinken":1030,"kankyo":1031,"keizai":1032,"kosodate":1033,"fukushi":1034,"gyosei":1035,"sumai":1036},[17,226,781,1027,27],52,[17,67,24,36,40],[17,67,21,38,24],[17,23,23,24,17],[17,62,74,21,41],[17,65,199,38,40],[17,62,35,141,24],[17,10,34,69,25],[17,66,32,24,41],[17,24,23,27,17],[45,46,47,48,49],1789179103203]