[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":855},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fymxdJ29DQ0lLgtMtQXAzgkyAhqEIx52BfOUNouSeqKg":3},[4,57,86,113,137,160,182,202,222,242,262,282,303,323,344,364,384,405,427,447,467,488,508,528,548,568,588,608,629,649,669,689,709,730,750,770,793,814,834],{"member_id":5,"name":6,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":13,"top_topics":14,"summary":15,"evidence":16,"fields":17,"field_years":52},29,"正保 みきお","日本共産党江東区議団","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F34shobo.jpg",1,2023,null,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7886.html",586,[],"物価高騰や災害対策、福祉施設の安全管理、障害児受け入れ、公共事業の労働条件など、生活困窮層・弱立場層の現状把握と行政対応の実現性を問う質問が記録に多く見られる。区の既存施策や計画の実効性、他自治体との比較、タイムラグ解消、現地確認の必要性等について、具体的な数値や事例を示しながら課題提起する傾向が記録から読み取れる。",[],{"bousai":18,"fukushi":24,"kosodate":29,"kenko":34,"machi":38,"kankyo":40,"keizai":45,"gyosei":48,"sumai":50,"jinken":51},[19,20,21,22,23],0,27,45,21,10,[19,25,26,27,28],28,41,31,24,[19,30,31,32,33],37,78,65,34,[19,35,23,36,37],20,8,7,[19,28,28,23,39],5,[19,41,42,43,44],2,19,15,3,[19,46,47,20,36],13,23,[19,37,49,43,36],16,[19,36,36,44,44],[19,44,39,19,41],[53,10,54,55,56],2022,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":30,"name":58,"party":7,"photo_url":59,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":60,"speech_count":61,"top_topics":62,"summary":63,"evidence":64,"fields":65,"field_years":85},"菅谷 俊一","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F43sugaya.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F91300.html",298,[],"労働環境・処遇改善と福祉施策の充実に関する発言が記録されている。公契約における末端労働者の賃金調査、保育士の人件費比率と離職率の関連性、障害者施設の不足、高齢者医療保険料の負担軽減など、具体的な数値・事例に基づいて現状把握と対策拡充を求める質問が多く見られる。",[],{"bousai":66,"fukushi":70,"kosodate":71,"kenko":74,"machi":76,"keizai":79,"gyosei":81,"jinken":82,"sumai":83,"kankyo":84},[19,36,67,68,69],9,14,6,[19,23,20,33,46],[19,39,72,5,73],32,11,[19,75,46,42,37],4,[19,46,49,77,78],18,12,[19,36,42,80,43],22,[19,39,78,43,39],[19,9,41,37,41],[19,69,43,77,23],[19,19,44,78,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":87,"name":88,"party":7,"photo_url":89,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":90,"speech_count":91,"top_topics":92,"summary":93,"evidence":94,"fields":95,"field_years":112},17,"西部 ただし","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F21nishibe.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0609.html",666,[],"地域の交通・福祉・教育・環境など幅広い政策課題について、具体的な現地視察や市民からの陳情に基づいた質問を記録している。新交通システムの対象外地域への対応、教育費負担軽減、介護保険料や施設利用料の値上げに対する施策拡充を繰り返し求める発言が目立つ。また国の基準では対応できない課題について、区独自の施策や条例整備の必要性を指摘する発言が複数残されている。",[],{"bousai":96,"fukushi":98,"kosodate":100,"kenko":103,"machi":104,"kankyo":107,"keizai":108,"gyosei":109,"sumai":110,"jinken":111},[19,78,97,28,75],52,[19,99,27,25,36],26,[19,87,101,102,87],38,43,[19,73,22,77,67],[19,68,105,106,43],39,66,[19,78,72,35,43],[19,73,87,80,35],[19,23,73,23,41],[19,39,5,22,36],[19,44,36,68,75],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":25,"name":114,"party":7,"photo_url":115,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":116,"speech_count":117,"top_topics":118,"summary":119,"evidence":120,"fields":121,"field_years":136},"赤羽目 たみお","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F33akabame.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F21409.html",480,[],"区民の生活困難や地域経済の冷え込みに対する支援充実を求める発言が多く記録されている。福祉削減や負担増に対する反対、基金活用による施策拡充、中小企業支援の必要性を繰り返し主張する傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"bousai":122,"fukushi":124,"kosodate":125,"kenko":127,"keizai":128,"gyosei":131,"sumai":132,"kankyo":133,"machi":134,"jinken":135},[19,22,87,123,47],25,[19,72,27,47,46],[19,126,78,78,67],90,[19,30,78,42,39],[19,129,130,27,77],36,33,[19,22,43,47,46],[19,43,46,73,69],[19,43,37,87,49],[19,102,77,35,123],[19,69,23,46,46],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":39,"name":138,"party":139,"photo_url":140,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":141,"speech_count":142,"top_topics":143,"summary":144,"evidence":145,"fields":146,"field_years":159},"さがやま　ともえ","江東区議会公明党","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F9sagayama.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0528.html",344,[],"福祉・教育・防災・環境など多分野にわたる事業の効率性と実効性を問う発言が記録されている。現在の区民生活課題への迅速な対応と将来への備えのバランス、新規事業の推進体制、職員体制の質的確保などについて、具体的な数値や制度設計を根拠に質疑する傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":147,"fukushi":149,"kosodate":150,"kenko":152,"machi":153,"kankyo":154,"keizai":155,"jinken":156,"sumai":157,"gyosei":158},[19,36,37,148,5],35,[19,37,68,68,68],[19,68,35,87,151],30,[19,9,73,42,37],[19,36,69,46,22],[19,75,80,35,77],[19,75,49,43,22],[19,41,67,37,41],[19,75,41,36,68],[19,44,67,28,68],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":68,"name":161,"party":139,"photo_url":162,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":164,"speech_count":165,"top_topics":166,"summary":167,"evidence":168,"fields":169,"field_years":181},"中根 たくや","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F19nakane.jpg",2019,"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7865.html",288,[],"子育て支援・福祉・防災・教育環境など区民生活に関わる施策について、具体的な制度設計や実行方法を問う質疑が記録されている。先行事例の調査、段階的な施策拡充、関係者との連携強化といった実装型のアプローチを繰り返し求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":170,"fukushi":171,"kosodate":172,"kenko":174,"kankyo":175,"keizai":176,"gyosei":177,"machi":178,"sumai":179,"jinken":180},[37,78,77,39,67],[67,87,46,39,19],[75,68,173,36,41],56,[67,42,68,39,19],[39,73,80,44,41],[67,68,23,44,41],[69,44,68,9,9],[36,99,36,23,68],[9,67,9,44,9],[19,75,75,9,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":130,"name":183,"party":139,"photo_url":184,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":185,"speech_count":186,"top_topics":187,"summary":188,"evidence":189,"fields":190,"field_years":201},"小嶋 和芳","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F40kojima.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7849.html",315,[],"防災・福祉・教育など広範な政策分野で、制度設計の詳細確認と実装段階での課題解決を重視する質問が記録されている。特に、給付事業の二重受給防止・詐欺対策、避難所機能の実効性確保、対象者への配慮（多言語対応・障害者支援）といった「制度の細部と運用の実効性」に関する指摘が多い。",[],{"bousai":191,"fukushi":192,"kosodate":193,"kenko":194,"machi":195,"kankyo":196,"keizai":197,"jinken":198,"sumai":199,"gyosei":200},[23,148,9,99,68],[68,23,9,87,23],[49,73,9,22,69],[25,37,9,49,46],[69,43,9,68,75],[73,68,9,77,69],[78,44,19,73,36],[19,19,19,44,9],[75,23,19,67,39],[39,44,19,37,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":75,"name":203,"party":139,"photo_url":204,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":205,"speech_count":206,"top_topics":207,"summary":208,"evidence":209,"fields":210,"field_years":221},"山下 金吾","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F4yamashita.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0520.html",254,[],"地域課題の解決に向けた具体的な制度改善や施設整備を求める質問が記録されている。防犯・防災・交通・教育・福祉など複数分野にわたり、区の現状把握と事業の拡充・見直しを指摘し、先進事例の検討や利用者ニーズへの対応を促す発言が多い。",[],{"bousai":211,"fukushi":212,"kosodate":213,"machi":214,"kankyo":215,"keizai":216,"gyosei":217,"kenko":218,"sumai":219,"jinken":220},[19,68,28,27,78],[19,39,87,78,75],[19,37,5,68,67],[19,87,33,35,68],[19,37,43,49,36],[19,39,37,37,67],[19,39,75,69,41],[19,41,73,44,75],[19,69,35,37,41],[19,9,19,19,75],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":28,"name":223,"party":139,"photo_url":224,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":225,"speech_count":226,"top_topics":227,"summary":228,"evidence":229,"fields":230,"field_years":241},"河野 清史","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F31kouno.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7871.html",332,[],"健康寿命延伸・予防医療、子育て支援充実、防災対策強化を主要テーマとする発言が多く記録されている。区民生活に関わる具体的な施策課題について、現状把握と改善提案を組み合わせた質問・要望パターンが特徴である。",[],{"fukushi":231,"kosodate":232,"kenko":233,"kankyo":234,"gyosei":235,"sumai":236,"bousai":237,"keizai":238,"machi":239,"jinken":240},[69,87,78,43,36],[73,43,75,68,46],[35,47,37,77,67],[67,78,23,68,67],[78,69,75,39,69],[39,37,44,44,75],[87,43,69,68,23],[69,75,23,69,69],[36,43,37,69,23],[9,19,41,75,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":43,"name":243,"party":139,"photo_url":244,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":245,"speech_count":246,"top_topics":247,"summary":248,"evidence":249,"fields":250,"field_years":261},"矢次 浩二","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F20yatsugi.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7883.html",443,[],"福祉・教育・防災・経済施策など幅広い分野で、事業の実効性・効率性・対象者の利便性に焦点を当てた質問と要望が記録されている。施策導入時の手続簡素化、関係機関との連携体制構築、データ活用による施策改善、対象拡大や支援充実の必要性を繰り返し指摘する傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":251,"fukushi":252,"kosodate":253,"kenko":254,"machi":255,"kankyo":256,"keizai":257,"gyosei":258,"jinken":259,"sumai":260},[41,75,69,42,43],[87,49,36,42,67],[42,105,35,5,69],[42,78,68,46,75],[75,73,43,68,49],[39,41,80,49,41],[43,77,36,5,46],[43,77,39,20,36],[19,9,44,9,41],[41,9,44,36,75],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":148,"name":263,"party":139,"photo_url":264,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":265,"speech_count":266,"top_topics":267,"summary":268,"evidence":269,"fields":270,"field_years":281},"石川 邦夫","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F42ishikawa.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7846.html",241,[],"交通・都市計画、子育て・福祉、財政運営など広範な分野で、現状認識と課題抽出に重点を置いた質問が記録されている。将来の困難予測に基づき「今から準備・検討が必要」と述べ、他自治体事例の調査や民間知見の活用、職員体制強化などの先制的対応を求める発言が多い。基金活用による積極的な新規事業提案や、部長級による経営的リーダーシップの発揮を要望する姿勢が見られる。",[],{"bousai":271,"fukushi":272,"kosodate":273,"kenko":274,"machi":275,"kankyo":276,"keizai":277,"gyosei":278,"sumai":279,"jinken":280},[69,75,39,78,75],[44,75,35,75,78],[67,36,49,41,42],[69,23,43,69,39],[69,69,9,151,67],[75,43,68,36,41],[41,49,35,68,77],[41,68,22,75,77],[75,9,75,44,19],[19,9,41,41,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":33,"name":283,"party":139,"photo_url":284,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":285,"speech_count":286,"top_topics":287,"summary":288,"evidence":289,"fields":290,"field_years":302},"関根 友子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F41sekine.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7859.html",272,[],"福祉・子育て・高齢者支援を中心に、具体的な先進事例の導入や制度拡充を求める質問が多く記録されている。地域連携やボランティア活動による課題解決を重視する発言傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":291,"fukushi":292,"kosodate":294,"kenko":295,"machi":296,"kankyo":297,"keizai":298,"gyosei":299,"sumai":300,"jinken":301},[19,78,39,75,19],[75,99,293,36,19],48,[75,35,20,37,19],[69,77,77,69,19],[39,39,23,41,19],[67,67,73,75,19],[75,39,36,44,19],[9,9,68,41,19],[69,46,36,39,19],[9,41,75,9,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":123,"name":304,"party":139,"photo_url":305,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":306,"speech_count":307,"top_topics":308,"summary":309,"evidence":310,"fields":311,"field_years":322},"髙村 きよみ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F32takamura.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7870.html",62,[],"子どもの福祉・教育と健康寿命延伸を中心に、生活課題への対応や施設整備を問う発言が多く記録されている。質問では現状把握と課題解決の方向性を確認する傾向があり、要望では実現の期限や対象拡大を促す発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":312,"fukushi":313,"kosodate":314,"kenko":315,"machi":316,"kankyo":317,"keizai":318,"gyosei":319,"jinken":320,"sumai":321},[19,19,19,37,19],[19,19,19,73,19],[19,19,19,47,19],[19,19,19,46,19],[19,19,19,23,19],[19,19,19,67,19],[19,19,19,75,19],[19,19,19,75,19],[19,19,19,44,19],[19,19,19,44,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":42,"name":324,"party":325,"photo_url":326,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":327,"speech_count":328,"top_topics":329,"summary":330,"evidence":331,"fields":332,"field_years":343},"二瓶 文隆","江東区議会維新・国民・共生クラブ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F18nihei.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F21406.html",245,[],"財政運営の「大きな政府か小さな政府か」という基本的な選択肢を区民に提示すべきと主張し、長期的な持続可能性や防災・環境・教育といった多様な行政課題について、具体的な事例調査や先進事例の検討を求める質問が記録されている。また、行政と民間・地域の協働や、戦後史・領土問題を含む歴史教育の重要性についても発言が見られる。",[],{"bousai":333,"fukushi":334,"kosodate":335,"kenko":336,"machi":337,"kankyo":338,"keizai":339,"gyosei":340,"sumai":341,"jinken":342},[69,39,46,23,37],[44,69,41,75,44],[36,130,36,41,36],[36,41,75,44,9],[42,46,49,39,23],[37,69,46,68,41],[36,36,46,69,69],[75,44,37,36,39],[44,44,39,44,19],[41,75,44,9,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":67,"name":345,"party":325,"photo_url":346,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":347,"speech_count":348,"top_topics":349,"summary":350,"evidence":351,"fields":352,"field_years":363},"加藤 陽子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F7kato.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0615.html",263,[],"福祉・介護・子育て・防災など複数分野にわたり、制度設計や事業実施の現場での課題把握と改善を求める発言が記録されている。特に「現場の声を丁寧に聞く」「伴走型サポート」「全世代対応」といった視点から、既存事業の拡充や対象者の拡大を提案する傾向が見られる。同時に、孤独・孤立対策や人材確保といった構造的課題に関して、予防的・先制的な対応の必要性を指摘する発言が多い。",[],{"bousai":353,"fukushi":354,"kenko":355,"kankyo":356,"sumai":357,"gyosei":358,"keizai":359,"kosodate":360,"machi":361,"jinken":362},[19,9,73,73,73],[19,27,72,123,36],[19,69,44,44,41],[19,69,36,78,67],[19,44,69,9,9],[19,37,23,69,75],[19,75,36,37,36],[19,68,49,73,36],[19,9,69,69,9],[19,41,19,9,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":77,"name":365,"party":325,"photo_url":366,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":367,"speech_count":368,"top_topics":369,"summary":370,"evidence":371,"fields":372,"field_years":383},"古賀 じょうじ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F22koga.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0518.html",268,[],"財政規律・行政効率化・教育施策の充実を軸に、データに基づく政策検証と区民サービス向上を求める発言が記録されている。人口減少への危機感から現役世代の満足度向上や税収安定化の必要性を繰り返し指摘し、既存事業の縮小廃止や予算配分の見直しを促す傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":373,"fukushi":374,"kosodate":375,"kankyo":376,"keizai":377,"gyosei":378,"kenko":379,"machi":380,"jinken":381,"sumai":382},[19,9,39,69,44],[19,9,39,67,36],[19,23,73,97,42],[19,9,23,37,37],[19,39,67,49,69],[19,37,23,77,46],[19,75,36,73,39],[19,41,67,23,36],[19,41,44,36,41],[19,19,75,69,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":37,"name":385,"party":325,"photo_url":386,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":387,"speech_count":388,"top_topics":389,"summary":390,"evidence":391,"fields":392,"field_years":404},"松澤 あいり","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F10matsuzawa.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0548.html",235,[],"子育て支援、教育環境整備、福祉人材確保といった生活課題について、具体的な施策の拡充や現場のニーズ把握を求める発言が多く記録されている。先行事例の研究や既存施設の活用、細部の運用改善といった実装的な提案を多数示している。",[],{"bousai":393,"fukushi":394,"kosodate":395,"machi":397,"kankyo":398,"keizai":399,"gyosei":400,"kenko":401,"sumai":402,"jinken":403},[19,9,73,46,39],[19,69,35,36,41],[19,87,396,396,87],53,[19,41,75,23,9],[19,41,73,73,67],[19,39,67,36,44],[19,69,23,67,19],[19,75,75,41,41],[19,19,41,37,19],[19,19,41,9,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":80,"name":406,"party":407,"photo_url":408,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":409,"speech_count":410,"top_topics":411,"summary":412,"evidence":413,"fields":414,"field_years":426},"おおやね 匠","江東区議会自民・参政・無所属クラブ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F25oyane.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7861.html",336,[],"地下鉄8号線の整備推進と沿線まちづくり、地域課題への対応に関する発言が記録の大部分を占める。工事進捗の加速化、地域住民への丁寧な説明と意見反映、具体的な施設整備（駅出入口位置・駅名称・バス停配置など）を繰り返し求める発言パターンが見られる。また物価高騰対策、廃棄物処理体制、公共施設管理など個別の区民生活課題についても、データに基づく具体的な提案や指摘をする発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":415,"kenko":416,"machi":417,"kankyo":419,"keizai":420,"gyosei":421,"fukushi":422,"kosodate":423,"sumai":424,"jinken":425},[37,19,75,36,41],[123,39,75,39,9],[97,28,20,418,68],49,[23,46,67,41,75],[35,75,37,69,9],[77,39,37,67,41],[46,44,9,39,19],[129,23,39,23,19],[69,44,41,46,41],[9,19,41,41,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":78,"name":428,"party":407,"photo_url":429,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":430,"speech_count":431,"top_topics":432,"summary":433,"evidence":434,"fields":435,"field_years":446},"やしきだ 綾香","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F13yashikida.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7882.html",240,[],"補正予算や施策展開の計画性・一貫性、施策間の連携、事業の実効性に関する質疑が記録に多く見られる。また、子育て支援・福祉・教育現場の具体的課題（保育士の保護者対応負担、目の健康教育、ヤングケアラー実態把握など）に関わる細かい進捗確認や改善提案が特徴的である。",[],{"bousai":436,"fukushi":437,"kosodate":438,"kenko":439,"machi":440,"kankyo":441,"keizai":442,"gyosei":443,"sumai":444,"jinken":445},[41,39,67,23,69],[23,80,68,78,75],[44,28,99,47,23],[78,49,73,68,75],[44,68,36,73,19],[9,73,69,37,41],[9,43,67,23,44],[41,67,69,68,19],[9,37,41,75,41],[19,41,41,9,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":46,"name":448,"party":407,"photo_url":449,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":450,"speech_count":451,"top_topics":452,"summary":453,"evidence":454,"fields":455,"field_years":466},"中嶋 雅樹","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F16nakajimamasaki.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7885.html",234,[],"公共施設整備・福祉施設・防災対策など幅広い行政課題について、現状把握と具体的な課題解決を求める質問が多く記録されている。制度や事業の効果検証、関係機関との調整状況の確認、予算執行の実効性を問う発言が特徴的である。",[],{"bousai":456,"fukushi":457,"kosodate":458,"kenko":459,"machi":460,"kankyo":461,"keizai":462,"jinken":463,"gyosei":464,"sumai":465},[39,46,47,46,44],[75,41,78,36,9],[35,36,22,37,9],[37,44,36,9,9],[75,75,36,43,75],[75,41,23,36,44],[69,75,43,36,44],[19,19,75,39,9],[41,75,87,41,9],[44,75,39,9,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":41,"name":468,"party":407,"photo_url":469,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":470,"speech_count":471,"top_topics":472,"summary":473,"evidence":474,"fields":475,"field_years":487},"井川 りょうたろう","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F2ikawa.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0637.html",264,[],"予算・施設維持管理・福祉・教育など多分野にわたり、財政効率性と実行状況を具体的数値で確認する質問が記録されている。現場課題（民生委員欠員、物価高騰による町会負担増等）を地域の声として提示し、改善策の検討を求める発言が多い。",[],{"bousai":476,"kosodate":477,"kenko":479,"kankyo":480,"keizai":481,"gyosei":482,"fukushi":483,"jinken":484,"sumai":485,"machi":486},[19,39,87,73,69],[19,39,23,478,36],58,[19,69,37,23,9],[19,9,23,78,75],[19,69,80,22,37],[19,75,67,80,69],[19,69,73,78,39],[19,44,41,41,19],[19,41,39,39,44],[19,69,73,41,41],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":9,"name":489,"party":407,"photo_url":490,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":491,"speech_count":492,"top_topics":493,"summary":494,"evidence":495,"fields":496,"field_years":507},"吉田 由紀子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F1yoshida.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0704.html",252,[],"外国人対応、子育て・教育環境、食育（特に有機米・地産地消）、ワクチン政策、自然療法・予防医学の推奨について繰り返し質問・意見を述べた記録が残されている。また、区の予算配分や行政判断に対して「バランスの見直しを求める」「別の視点での検討を要望する」といった異議申し立ての発言が多数記録されている。",[],{"bousai":497,"kosodate":498,"kankyo":499,"keizai":500,"jinken":501,"fukushi":502,"kenko":503,"sumai":504,"machi":505,"gyosei":506},[19,75,69,69,75],[19,5,102,35,36],[19,39,37,69,36],[19,9,39,39,75],[19,41,36,68,78],[19,41,39,39,37],[19,37,77,78,75],[19,19,37,9,41],[19,41,36,41,44],[19,75,39,19,36],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":44,"name":509,"party":407,"photo_url":510,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":511,"speech_count":512,"top_topics":513,"summary":514,"evidence":515,"fields":516,"field_years":527},"堀川 まさひろ","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F3horikawa.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0642.html",183,[],"防災・災害対策、都市基盤整備、公園・環境、福祉・生活困窮対策など広範な行政課題について、具体的な事例・統計・比較事例を引用しながら質問する発言が記録されている。区民生活の課題解決に向けた制度改善や施設整備の必要性を指摘し、予算増額や運用改善を求める質問が多く記録されている。",[],{"bousai":517,"kosodate":518,"kenko":519,"machi":520,"kankyo":521,"keizai":522,"fukushi":523,"gyosei":524,"jinken":525,"sumai":526},[19,23,23,37,46],[19,73,23,39,43],[19,39,44,44,37],[19,69,78,67,37],[19,69,49,75,75],[19,75,39,67,69],[19,73,73,69,41],[19,37,39,41,41],[19,9,9,44,19],[19,69,39,9,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":72,"name":529,"party":407,"photo_url":530,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":531,"speech_count":532,"top_topics":533,"summary":534,"evidence":535,"fields":536,"field_years":547},"山本 香代子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F33yamamoto.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7862.html",2143,[],"教育施設（プール授業）、福祉政策（住宅困窮者支援）、環境・廃棄物対策、都市開発など複数分野にわたる質問が記録されている。区の施策の具体的な実績値や課題解決のスケジュール、事業効果の検証を求める質疑の傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":537,"kenko":538,"machi":539,"kankyo":540,"gyosei":541,"kosodate":542,"jinken":543,"bousai":544,"keizai":545,"sumai":546},[123,129,30,47,9],[35,130,130,35,39],[28,47,123,22,46],[43,73,78,42,69],[20,99,28,87,9],[99,129,20,35,44],[41,9,19,75,19],[67,22,68,36,36],[41,41,19,37,39],[9,44,41,37,41],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":22,"name":549,"party":407,"photo_url":550,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":551,"speech_count":552,"top_topics":553,"summary":554,"evidence":555,"fields":556,"field_years":567},"川北 直人","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F24kawakita.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7868.html",386,[],"行政の制度設計・施策実行にあたり、施策の意図が住民に伝わるか、行政間の調整過程が十分か、社会情勢の変化に対応しているか等の点から、詳細な質疑を重ねる傾向が記録されている。また区内事業者や関係団体との協議状況の把握、施策の効果測定と改善の必要性を問う発言が多く残されている。",[],{"bousai":557,"fukushi":558,"kosodate":559,"kenko":560,"machi":561,"kankyo":562,"keizai":563,"gyosei":564,"jinken":565,"sumai":566},[36,44,42,43,69],[69,39,68,87,37],[37,68,77,43,87],[23,49,87,22,19],[67,75,78,37,43],[39,78,47,77,69],[67,80,47,105,23],[44,49,28,148,75],[19,44,39,9,19],[9,69,69,37,67],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":73,"name":569,"party":407,"photo_url":570,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":571,"speech_count":572,"top_topics":573,"summary":574,"evidence":575,"fields":576,"field_years":587},"金子 ひさし","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F4kaneko.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F91259.html",293,[],"区民生活に関わる細部の制度設計・運用に対する質問が多く記録されている。福祉・保育・住宅・防災など広範囲の分野で、対象者の属性別ニーズ（高齢者・障害者・小規模事業者など）に配慮した施策実施を求める発言が目立つ。また、区の予算執行・財政見通し・事業継続性についての確認質問が繰り返される傾向にある。",[],{"bousai":577,"fukushi":578,"kosodate":579,"kankyo":580,"keizai":581,"gyosei":582,"kenko":583,"machi":584,"sumai":585,"jinken":586},[39,39,67,75,9],[39,75,78,75,43],[69,46,36,39,68],[39,75,67,44,37],[69,123,77,75,42],[39,49,68,75,22],[67,37,44,41,69],[23,73,46,69,41],[41,23,41,44,36],[41,39,44,19,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":47,"name":589,"party":407,"photo_url":590,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":591,"speech_count":592,"top_topics":593,"summary":594,"evidence":595,"fields":596,"field_years":607},"釼先 美彦","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F26kenzaki.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7866.html",789,[],"議長としての職務に関連した発言が大部分を占める。委員会報告の省略決定、一般質問の進行、議案可決の宣告などの議事進行発言が記録されている。また、教育現場の課題（教員負担軽減、不登校対策、学校施設の防災機能）について、具体的な改善提案を伴った質問が複数記録されている。",[],{"gyosei":597,"kosodate":598,"machi":599,"kankyo":600,"fukushi":601,"kenko":602,"bousai":603,"sumai":604,"keizai":605,"jinken":606},[73,41,41,49,36],[30,80,37,148,78],[87,35,42,87,36],[73,44,37,87,39],[44,37,75,87,42],[73,44,39,73,35],[36,35,77,23,41],[75,41,44,44,75],[69,75,69,75,19],[19,9,9,19,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":69,"name":609,"party":610,"photo_url":611,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":612,"speech_count":613,"top_topics":614,"summary":615,"evidence":616,"fields":617,"field_years":628},"中島 雄太郎","江東新時代の会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F6nakajima.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0729.html",307,[],"健康診断・保育・交通・防災・環境等の広範な分野で、事業の費用対効果の測定と効果検証の強化を求める発言が多く記録されている。特に、定量的な成果指標の設定不足や施策の実装前の実機テストの必要性を指摘し、税金投入の妥当性を客観的に判断できる体制整備を強調する傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":618,"kosodate":619,"machi":620,"keizai":621,"sumai":622,"fukushi":623,"kankyo":624,"gyosei":625,"kenko":626,"jinken":627},[19,75,37,37,46],[19,44,43,28,23],[19,39,37,77,23],[19,78,69,80,77],[19,9,39,69,37],[19,44,23,75,44],[19,44,35,46,87],[19,39,69,46,23],[19,39,37,87,78],[19,36,41,41,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":49,"name":630,"party":610,"photo_url":631,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":632,"speech_count":633,"top_topics":634,"summary":635,"evidence":636,"fields":637,"field_years":648},"吉田 要","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F29yoshidakaname.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F21408.html",455,[],"介護・福祉・保育・障害支援など社会保障分野の施策課題に関する質問が大多数で、各現場の人材確保難や施設整備、サービス品質維持のバランスに関心を持つ記録が残っている。併せて予算執行の効率性、事業効果の検証、区民周知の在り方などについて具体的な数値や先進事例と比較しながら確認する発言が多く見られる。",[],{"bousai":638,"fukushi":639,"kosodate":640,"kankyo":641,"keizai":642,"gyosei":643,"kenko":644,"machi":645,"sumai":646,"jinken":647},[42,49,23,73,9],[47,123,30,20,67],[68,72,49,80,37],[35,27,49,46,69],[68,30,77,123,44],[37,77,42,23,36],[130,43,73,36,19],[77,20,41,36,19],[37,41,41,9,9],[9,75,69,9,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":129,"name":650,"party":610,"photo_url":651,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":652,"speech_count":653,"top_topics":654,"summary":655,"evidence":656,"fields":657,"field_years":668},"徳永 雅博","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F39tokunaga.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7852.html",283,[],"予算編成・施策評価・契約制度などの行政運営全般にわたり、具体的な数字や比較データを示しながら現状認識と今後の方針を詳細に質問する発言が記録されている。特に、事業の効率性・実効性、現場の課題把握、制度の整合性を問う指摘が多く見られる。",[],{"bousai":658,"fukushi":659,"kosodate":660,"kenko":661,"machi":662,"keizai":663,"gyosei":664,"sumai":665,"kankyo":666,"jinken":667},[42,75,67,36,9],[87,69,75,49,9],[77,36,37,49,36],[49,39,75,36,41],[69,37,46,67,44],[44,39,69,5,39],[36,44,44,123,9],[39,75,44,44,19],[44,75,75,73,36],[19,19,41,41,41],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":99,"name":670,"party":610,"photo_url":671,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":672,"speech_count":673,"top_topics":674,"summary":675,"evidence":676,"fields":677,"field_years":688},"鈴木 綾子","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F30suzuki.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F21410.html",363,[],"福祉・子育て・都市開発など幅広い分野で、他自治体の先進事例を参照しながら具体的な制度改善や施策拡充を求める発言が多く記録されている。区民サービス向上に向けた実効性・利便性の検証と、段階的な施策導入の検討を促す傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":678,"fukushi":679,"kosodate":680,"kenko":681,"machi":682,"kankyo":683,"keizai":684,"gyosei":685,"jinken":686,"sumai":687},[37,75,49,73,39],[87,39,23,36,37],[43,27,47,37,49],[28,67,87,44,37],[72,35,43,69,47],[37,73,68,37,43],[46,46,73,78,73],[78,78,46,75,49],[36,41,69,44,75],[49,46,41,39,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":20,"name":690,"party":610,"photo_url":691,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":692,"speech_count":693,"top_topics":694,"summary":695,"evidence":696,"fields":697,"field_years":708},"鬼頭 たつや","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F38kito.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F21407.html",196,[],"地元の深川地区や牡丹地区の具体的な課題（橋梁改修・公園整備・商店街活性化など）を中心に質問する傾向が強く、インフラ整備や地域経済の振興に関わる施策の進捗状況や具体的な内容について、行政職に確認する質問が記録されている。また、区民からの具体的な要望（バリアフリー化、工事による生活への影響、手数料負担など）を取り上げ、実行や改善を促す発言が多い。",[],{"bousai":698,"fukushi":699,"kosodate":700,"keizai":701,"gyosei":702,"kankyo":703,"machi":704,"sumai":705,"kenko":706,"jinken":707},[41,9,23,75,19],[68,44,19,9,19],[78,46,75,23,19],[49,36,49,9,19],[39,36,36,9,19],[41,9,39,41,19],[41,67,27,73,19],[9,19,44,9,19],[23,44,44,19,19],[19,19,9,19,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":151,"name":710,"party":711,"photo_url":712,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":713,"speech_count":714,"top_topics":715,"summary":716,"evidence":717,"fields":718,"field_years":729},"にしがき 誠","江東清風会","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F15nishigaki.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7853.html",323,[],"行政施策の実施過程における実務的な課題や改善案を詳しく掘り下げる傾向が強い。単なる予算額や事業名の確認にとどまらず、効果検証の方法論、対象外の層への支援、スケジュール面での問題、人材確保、システム設計など、具体的な運用段階の詳細を質問として記録している。",[],{"bousai":719,"fukushi":720,"kosodate":721,"machi":722,"keizai":723,"gyosei":724,"kankyo":725,"jinken":726,"sumai":727,"kenko":728},[78,39,80,36,41],[69,69,44,37,23],[47,69,5,25,5],[69,75,129,49,37],[42,75,87,67,67],[49,75,37,67,41],[69,75,69,44,9],[19,19,9,41,19],[36,37,22,69,67],[43,69,37,41,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":101,"name":731,"party":711,"photo_url":732,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":733,"speech_count":734,"top_topics":735,"summary":736,"evidence":737,"fields":738,"field_years":749},"星野 博","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F37hoshino.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7856.html",162,[],"火葬場・無電柱化・地下鉄8号線など地元の課題解決に繰り返し質問する傾向が記録されている。行政側の「できない」「時間がかかる」との答弁に対し、「知恵を絞る」「前向きな検討」を求める発言が多く、実現可能性の模索を重視する姿勢が読み取れる。",[],{"fukushi":739,"kosodate":740,"gyosei":741,"jinken":742,"machi":743,"kenko":744,"bousai":745,"sumai":746,"keizai":747,"kankyo":748},[41,41,41,44,41],[36,39,37,49,39],[44,44,19,41,41],[69,41,39,9,41],[37,68,78,37,9],[19,44,9,9,19],[75,75,75,75,44],[41,41,41,9,39],[19,75,44,19,19],[44,44,36,19,19],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":27,"name":751,"party":711,"photo_url":752,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":753,"speech_count":754,"top_topics":755,"summary":756,"evidence":757,"fields":758,"field_years":769},"米沢 和裕","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F27yonezawa.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F60637.html",262,[],"地元・砂町地域の課題（商店街振興、不燃化特区、防災生活道路など）に関する質問が集中して記録されている。また、区の施策の実績把握と効果測定、23区間での基準統一の必要性を繰り返し指摘する発言が目立つ。制度や事業の導入段階では慎重な検討を求める姿勢も記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":759,"kosodate":760,"kenko":761,"machi":762,"kankyo":763,"keizai":764,"gyosei":765,"bousai":766,"sumai":767,"jinken":768},[75,39,37,39,9],[39,69,67,69,41],[39,39,44,39,9],[69,73,67,69,67],[41,37,75,36,69],[75,44,67,43,69],[9,75,75,41,41],[36,36,78,36,36],[19,75,41,44,44],[19,19,9,19,9],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":35,"name":771,"party":772,"photo_url":773,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":774,"speech_count":775,"top_topics":776,"summary":777,"evidence":778,"fields":779,"field_years":792},"まにわ 尚之","無所属（市民の声・江東）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F12maniwa.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0683.html",383,[],"福祉・介護・障害者支援を中心に、制度の不備や現場の実情とのギャップを指摘する質問が記録されている。個別事業の具体的な数字や実績、職員待遇、利用者負担などの細部を確認する傾向が見られる。また、区民参加や情報公開、制度間の連携不足といった構造的課題の改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":780,"kosodate":783,"keizai":784,"gyosei":785,"sumai":786,"bousai":787,"machi":788,"kankyo":789,"jinken":790,"kenko":791},[19,33,781,782,130],44,63,[19,42,22,80,67],[19,75,69,47,46],[19,41,39,36,44],[19,75,39,69,9],[19,9,39,9,69],[19,46,68,36,19],[19,44,39,39,39],[19,9,69,69,44],[19,67,43,46,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":105,"name":794,"party":795,"photo_url":796,"terms":41,"elected_at":163,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":797,"speech_count":798,"top_topics":799,"summary":800,"evidence":801,"fields":802,"field_years":813},"佐藤 信夫","無所属（江東区議会・無所属）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F36sato.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F7855.html",337,[],"地域の生活課題（詐欺被害防止、商店街振興、防災、交通安全）への具体的な施策改善を何度も提案・要望する発言が多く記録されている。また、大規模事業（地下鉄8号線、オリンピック施設活用、公営住宅建設）について、費用対効果や環境配慮、長期的なまちづくり観点からの検証・改善を求める質疑が目立つ。",[],{"bousai":803,"fukushi":804,"kosodate":805,"kenko":806,"machi":807,"keizai":808,"gyosei":809,"jinken":810,"sumai":811,"kankyo":812},[87,39,77,23,69],[39,69,67,37,9],[23,73,78,20,44],[123,46,36,39,44],[5,46,22,78,39],[69,39,9,39,75],[69,67,37,44,9],[41,44,44,41,9],[39,69,36,39,19],[35,36,37,23,44],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":23,"name":815,"party":816,"photo_url":817,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":818,"speech_count":186,"top_topics":819,"summary":820,"evidence":821,"fields":822,"field_years":833},"高野 はやと","無所属（立憲民主党）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F5takano.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0752.html",[],"外国人共生・防災・人権、公共施設の効率性検証、受動喫煙対策などの施策について、データに基づく意思決定と対象者への丁寧な説明・情報公開を求める発言が多く記録されている。また、社会変化に対応した制度設計（パートナーシップ制度など）の必要性を指摘する発言も見られる。",[],{"bousai":823,"fukushi":824,"kosodate":825,"machi":826,"kankyo":827,"keizai":828,"gyosei":829,"jinken":830,"sumai":831,"kenko":832},[19,78,49,78,23],[19,23,37,46,23],[19,73,67,39,37],[19,75,43,47,77],[19,19,44,49,23],[19,37,37,23,23],[19,69,39,67,37],[19,68,78,78,44],[19,37,69,73,39],[19,78,39,67,75],[53,10,54,55,56],{"member_id":36,"name":835,"party":836,"photo_url":837,"terms":9,"elected_at":10,"assembly_id":9,"role":11,"profile_url":838,"speech_count":839,"top_topics":840,"summary":841,"evidence":842,"fields":843,"field_years":854},"千田 昌寛","無所属（青嵐会）","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002Fimages\u002F11senda.jpg","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.city.koto.lg.jp\u002F650103\u002Fkuse\u002Fkugikai\u002Fshokai\u002Fgisekijun\u002F0565.html",133,[],"拉致問題と国家防衛・有事対応を中心に取り上げた発言が記録されている。学校教育での拉致問題の教育充実、防犯カメラ・シェルター整備、自衛隊・海上保安庁との連携強化を繰り返し求める質問や要望が多い。また動物愛護、防災、特殊詐欺対策など地域の安全・安心に関わる複数の分野について質問している。",[],{"bousai":844,"fukushi":845,"kosodate":846,"kankyo":847,"jinken":848,"sumai":849,"gyosei":850,"keizai":851,"machi":852,"kenko":853},[19,67,46,68,23],[19,9,19,9,75],[19,41,75,78,44],[19,19,41,9,44],[19,75,69,69,75],[19,9,9,9,41],[19,9,9,41,19],[19,41,41,44,19],[19,75,37,9,9],[19,41,19,19,41],[53,10,54,55,56],1789179103312]