[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":761},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fX72zMYHQfsJTFkBnoV_oofbbiqy1Q7AIFMOkpaUSGbM":3},[4,57,80,100,130,158,179,204,230,258,279,301,334,364,385,406,426,446,466,488,511,534,554,574,594,615,635,655,676,696,719,740],{"member_id":5,"name":6,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":11,"top_topics":12,"summary":13,"evidence":14,"fields":15,"field_years":51},525,"さいき 陽平","みなと未来会議","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn48_Gn_saiki_youhei_202305.jpg",null,16,547,[],"子ども・少子化対策と行財政管理を主要関心領域とし、政策の詳細な根拠や数値、他自治体事例の比較検証に基づいて質問する傾向が記録されている。同時に、実施事業の成果検証や制度設計の妥当性を問い直す指摘が多く見られ、既存方針の再検討を促す発言が特徴的である。",[],{"fukushi":16,"kenko":22,"gyosei":27,"bousai":30,"kosodate":32,"machi":37,"kankyo":38,"keizai":42,"jinken":44,"sumai":48},[17,18,19,20,21],0,21,20,14,12,[17,23,24,25,26],19,25,8,2,[17,28,23,10,29],15,9,[17,31,23,20,21],7,[17,33,34,35,36],68,56,65,18,[17,20,20,18,20],[17,39,23,40,41],17,22,10,[17,43,19,19,20],29,[17,45,25,46,47],5,6,1,[17,45,25,49,50],3,11,[52,53,54,55,56],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":58,"name":59,"party":7,"photo_url":60,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":61,"top_topics":62,"summary":63,"evidence":64,"fields":65,"field_years":79},534,"なかまえ 由紀","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn21_Gn21_nakamae_yuki_202305.jpg",648,[],"予算・決算審議における具体的な数値検証と制度設計の妥当性確認を軸とする発言が記録されている。事業実施時の費用対効果・優先順位・区民負担のバランス、ならびに行政データの高度な分析と長期スパンでの政策検討を求める発言が多い。また、事業委託先の選定過程における公平性確保や、働く職員の処遇改善を含む実装段階の課題提起が特徴である。",[],{"fukushi":66,"kosodate":68,"kankyo":70,"machi":71,"bousai":73,"sumai":74,"kenko":75,"gyosei":76,"keizai":77,"jinken":78},[17,21,31,67,36],34,[17,67,50,69,29],24,[17,41,41,31,41],[17,31,72,29,25],4,[17,20,41,25,45],[17,25,49,29,45],[17,25,72,40,50],[17,10,46,39,29],[17,18,41,39,46],[17,26,17,45,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":81,"name":82,"party":7,"photo_url":83,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":84,"top_topics":85,"summary":86,"evidence":87,"fields":88,"field_years":99},526,"七戸 じゅん","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn29_shichinohe_jun_.jpg",45,[],"地域課題の詳細な質問や経緯の説明が記録されており、高齢者施設整備、神宮外苑再開発、学校給食費などの区政課題に対して、背景情報を踏まえた問題提起を行う傾向が見られる。また、議会と行政の連携改善や地域住民との合意形成の重要性を指摘する発言が複数記録されている。",[],{"bousai":89,"fukushi":90,"kosodate":91,"kenko":92,"machi":93,"keizai":94,"gyosei":95,"jinken":96,"sumai":97,"kankyo":98},[17,47,17,47,49],[17,49,17,26,49],[17,26,47,26,72],[17,49,17,47,49],[17,26,17,47,72],[17,49,17,26,47],[17,26,17,26,47],[17,17,17,47,47],[17,47,17,47,47],[17,47,17,47,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":101,"name":102,"party":7,"photo_url":103,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":104,"top_topics":105,"summary":106,"evidence":107,"fields":108,"field_years":129},519,"榎本 あゆみ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn2_enomoto_ayumi.jpg",1400,[],"子育て・教育・福祉分野で具体的な制度設計と実装の課題を指摘する発言が多く記録されている。共働き家庭を前提とした学校運営や支援制度の拡充、窓口対応の実効性といった現場の課題を数値・事例で示しながら質問・提案する傾向が見取れる。また行政購買や予算執行の一元化、情報共有プロセスの改善についても指摘する発言が複数残されている。",[],{"keizai":109,"gyosei":112,"kankyo":115,"sumai":117,"fukushi":118,"kenko":120,"kosodate":121,"bousai":125,"jinken":126,"machi":127},[17,110,111,67,45],43,31,[17,113,39,114,41],27,33,[17,24,23,116,45],28,[17,49,41,45,47],[17,20,21,119,46],26,[17,19,36,10,31],[17,122,123,124,111],104,126,79,[17,31,23,21,41],[17,49,46,41,49],[17,19,10,128,29],30,[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":131,"name":132,"party":7,"photo_url":133,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":134,"top_topics":135,"summary":136,"evidence":137,"fields":138,"field_years":157},530,"玉木 まこと","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn1_Gn1_02-tamaki.jpg",622,[],"環境・都市計画・防災・福祉など多分野にわたる詳細な質問が記録されており、事業・施策の具体的な内容確認と、区民・利用者の視点からの課題指摘、関連部署間の連携強化を求める発言が多い。初歩的な質問と断りながらも、背景となる条例・基準・先行事例を参照した実務的な質疑が特徴である。",[],{"machi":139,"sumai":143,"gyosei":144,"bousai":145,"fukushi":148,"kosodate":149,"jinken":151,"keizai":152,"kankyo":154,"kenko":156},[17,140,141,142,45],127,105,41,[17,119,23,23,17],[17,18,50,49,17],[17,146,147,46,17],32,36,[17,41,21,41,17],[17,67,18,150,17],13,[17,72,45,49,47],[17,153,153,39,17],51,[17,155,114,20,17],42,[17,19,25,47,17],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":159,"name":160,"party":7,"photo_url":161,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":162,"top_topics":163,"summary":164,"evidence":165,"fields":166,"field_years":178},517,"石渡 ゆきこ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn43_ishiwatari_yukiko.jpg",413,[],"消費者問題・法律専門知識を背景に、行政手続の適正性・透明性・情報公開を中心に質問を重ねる。再開発・福祉・防災など多領域にわたり、制度の細部の問題指摘と改善提案を記録に残している。地方議会で「立法事実の積み上げ」が必要との認識から、基礎自治体で取り組むべき課題を丁寧に掘り下げる発言傾向が見られる。",[],{"keizai":167,"gyosei":168,"machi":169,"kosodate":170,"kenko":171,"fukushi":172,"bousai":173,"sumai":175,"kankyo":176,"jinken":177},[17,113,50,111,31],[17,31,72,28,26],[17,116,150,20,26],[17,24,18,40,47],[17,50,29,21,47],[17,18,20,23,72],[17,18,10,174,31],23,[17,69,31,31,47],[17,46,45,20,49],[17,45,49,25,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":180,"name":181,"party":182,"photo_url":183,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":184,"top_topics":185,"summary":186,"evidence":187,"fields":188,"field_years":203},533,"なかね 大","公明党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn45_Gn45_nakane_dai_202305.jpg",893,[],"児童福祉、障がい者支援、公園整備など地域の身近な課題について、住民からの相談や要望を具体的に拾い上げ、実現可能性や現場の課題を丁寧に掘り下げる質問が記録されている。議案への賛否判断では、民間事業者との協働における「公共性」の維持を区が主導する必要性を指摘する発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":189,"kosodate":191,"kenko":195,"keizai":196,"gyosei":197,"sumai":198,"kankyo":199,"bousai":200,"machi":201,"jinken":202},[17,36,46,190,84],69,[17,192,119,193,194],44,93,35,[17,50,72,155,142],[17,24,150,43,46],[17,49,50,21,46],[17,21,49,41,29],[17,25,20,36,21],[17,40,50,40,46],[17,111,150,21,31],[17,47,72,49,45],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":205,"name":206,"party":182,"photo_url":207,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":208,"top_topics":209,"summary":210,"evidence":211,"fields":212,"field_years":229},541,"丸山 たかのり","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn5_Gn5_maruyama_takanori_202305.jpg",1064,[],"保育・福祉・教育・都市計画など幅広い分野で具体的な制度設計や運用方法の詳細を確認する質問が多く記録されている。聞き取った情報が正確かを繰り返し確認し、行政の説明内容に対して現場の実態や先行事例との比較を通じた改善提案をする発言が特徴である。",[],{"kosodate":213,"gyosei":215,"bousai":216,"fukushi":217,"machi":220,"sumai":221,"kenko":222,"jinken":224,"kankyo":225,"keizai":227},[17,214,190,113,39],92,[17,24,19,28,150],[17,10,119,21,29],[17,218,219,23,41],57,62,[17,84,119,192,69],[17,20,28,21,49],[17,223,223,21,25],54,[17,21,36,31,72],[17,226,146,29,46],40,[17,228,128,18,41],37,[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":231,"name":232,"party":182,"photo_url":233,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":234,"top_topics":235,"summary":236,"evidence":237,"fields":238,"field_years":257},516,"池田 たけし","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn6_Gn6_ikeda_takeshi_202305.jpg",2359,[],"発言記録の大部分が委員会の進行・議事運営に関する定型的な発言であり、個別案件の審議や質疑に関わる実質的な発言は限定的である。記録に残る具体的な発言からは、保育・福祉・防災・観光対応など複数分野での関心が読み取れるが、多くは委員会内での情報照会や要望提示の形式となっている。",[],{"kosodate":239,"kankyo":243,"bousai":244,"fukushi":245,"kenko":249,"machi":252,"keizai":253,"gyosei":254,"jinken":255,"sumai":256},[17,240,241,242,20],58,85,83,[17,128,28,40,150],[17,84,40,23,50],[17,246,247,248,41],39,86,66,[17,194,250,251,45],64,48,[17,190,228,40,41],[17,43,119,69,45],[17,33,153,20,72],[17,39,49,29,46],[17,69,50,41,46],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":259,"name":260,"party":182,"photo_url":261,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":262,"top_topics":263,"summary":264,"evidence":265,"fields":266,"field_years":278},537,"野本 たつや","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn53_nomoto_tatsuya_202411.jpg",387,[],"福祉・子育て・環境・地域活動など複数分野にわたり、区民の具体的な相談事例や現場の課題を踏まえた質問が記録されている。政策実現に向けて、制度の周知方法、対象範囲の拡大、関係機関の連携体制整備などの改善を求める発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":267,"kosodate":268,"keizai":270,"gyosei":271,"jinken":272,"kankyo":273,"bousai":274,"sumai":275,"kenko":276,"machi":277},[17,31,28,18,72],[17,39,228,269,46],38,[17,29,20,119,72],[17,49,25,174,45],[17,26,47,72,17],[17,41,10,40,49],[17,72,113,50,49],[17,46,29,50,26],[17,72,10,174,72],[17,41,36,21,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":280,"name":281,"party":282,"photo_url":283,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":284,"top_topics":285,"summary":286,"evidence":287,"fields":288,"field_years":300},543,"森 けいじろう","共産党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn56_Gn_mori_keijirou_202305.jpg",699,[],"実行細節や数字の根拠を丁寧に確認し、施策の周知度・効果測定・財源充当を問う発言が記録されている。環境・福祉・教育など広範な分野で、行政施策の実効性向上と対象外層への支援拡大を求める質問が多い。",[],{"keizai":289,"gyosei":290,"kosodate":292,"bousai":293,"machi":294,"fukushi":295,"kenko":296,"jinken":297,"kankyo":298,"sumai":299},[17,19,146,240,69],[17,36,24,291,19],49,[17,194,111,228,41],[17,39,128,24,49],[17,45,36,36,72],[17,150,174,114,50],[17,45,28,46,72],[17,31,49,26,17],[17,50,111,39,20],[17,31,25,41,45],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":302,"name":303,"party":282,"photo_url":304,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":305,"top_topics":306,"summary":307,"evidence":308,"fields":309,"field_years":333},539,"福島 宏子","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn46_Gn46_fukushima_hiroko.jpg",2794,[],"施設運営・福祉制度・保育園等の具体的な制度設計や運用実態について詳細な質問を行い、未実装部分や制度上の矛盾点を指摘して改善を求める発言が多く記録されている。周知方法の不十分さ、対象外となる世帯への配慮、民間事業者と公営施設の待遇格差、職員労働環境といった政策の「不備や漏れ」を問う姿勢が一貫して表れている。",[],{"fukushi":310,"kosodate":315,"kankyo":320,"sumai":321,"machi":322,"kenko":324,"keizai":327,"gyosei":330,"jinken":331,"bousai":332},[17,311,312,313,314],202,187,137,73,[17,316,317,318,319],279,265,203,74,[17,119,67,174,20],[17,67,40,21,29],[17,33,323,153,113],61,[17,325,140,326,291],148,52,[17,247,328,329,36],87,63,[17,69,226,50,50],[17,31,25,28,31],[17,128,194,36,29],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":335,"name":336,"party":282,"photo_url":337,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":338,"top_topics":339,"summary":340,"evidence":341,"fields":342,"field_years":363},522,"風見 利男","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn28_kazami_toshio.jpg",2458,[],"区行政の政策決定過程における具体的根拠や費用対効果の明示を繰り返し求める発言が記録されている。住宅困窮、福祉施設、私立学校費用補助など社会的弱者に関わる施策について、現状の課題指摘と改善方向の提示を求める質問が多く見られる。",[],{"sumai":343,"machi":347,"bousai":351,"kankyo":352,"keizai":353,"fukushi":356,"gyosei":357,"jinken":358,"kenko":359,"kosodate":360},[17,344,345,346,46],146,75,81,[17,348,349,350,110],290,121,125,[17,323,240,246,72],[17,110,28,40,49],[17,354,240,355,119],118,59,[17,240,147,21,25],[17,39,25,28,26],[17,28,29,25,26],[17,69,31,45,17],[17,361,362,194,21],108,53,[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":365,"name":366,"party":367,"photo_url":368,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":369,"top_topics":370,"summary":371,"evidence":372,"fields":373,"field_years":384},532,"とよ島 くにひろ","参政党の会","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn51_Gn_toyoshima_kunihiro_202305.jpg",326,[],"ワクチン接種、教科書採択、マイナンバーカード、成年後見制度など、公共政策の実施プロセスや制度設計について、情報開示・インフォームドコンセント・慎重な導入段階の必要性を指摘する発言が記録されている。また施設運営や地域課題（喫煙場所、ごみ処理、騒音）の具体的な改善提案も多く見られる。",[],{"kosodate":374,"kankyo":375,"keizai":376,"machi":377,"jinken":378,"bousai":379,"fukushi":380,"kenko":381,"sumai":382,"gyosei":383},[17,41,36,24,31],[17,17,45,29,47],[17,47,45,39,47],[17,17,26,45,26],[17,47,72,31,17],[17,47,47,46,17],[17,72,46,150,17],[17,40,40,150,47],[17,47,17,49,47],[17,50,26,26,17],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":386,"name":387,"party":388,"photo_url":389,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":390,"top_topics":391,"summary":392,"evidence":393,"fields":394,"field_years":405},528,"新藤 加菜","港区保守系議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn50_Shinndou.jpg",1436,[],"委員会の進行役を務めながら、教育・福祉・環境・観光など多岐にわたる政策課題について質問を行う記録が残されている。外国籍住民への対応、女性専用スペースの確保、シンガポール修学旅行プログラムの実地踏査体制など、具体的で多層的な問題提起をする発言が特徴的である。",[],{"gyosei":395,"fukushi":396,"kosodate":397,"keizai":398,"bousai":399,"jinken":400,"machi":401,"kenko":402,"sumai":403,"kankyo":404},[17,29,72,355,174],[17,25,25,111,29],[17,50,345,124,21],[17,21,28,114,21],[17,41,146,43,24],[17,36,43,116,50],[17,25,150,40,50],[17,25,72,20,41],[17,72,40,28,26],[17,31,41,113,20],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":407,"name":408,"party":388,"photo_url":409,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":410,"top_topics":411,"summary":412,"evidence":413,"fields":414,"field_years":425},536,"根本 ゆう","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn52_Gn_nemoto_yuu_202305.jpg",420,[],"防災・危機管理分野の委員会運営と、都市開発・まちづくり・コミュニティー政策に関する質疑が記録に占める割合が大きい。防災カメラ設置、業務継続計画、地域防災計画といった施策の詳細確認と、町会・自治会設立要件の緩和、マンション自治会の独立支援、水辺環境やブルーカーボン対策といった個別課題について、根拠や具体性を求める質問が繰り返し記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":415,"keizai":416,"bousai":417,"kankyo":418,"machi":419,"sumai":420,"fukushi":421,"gyosei":422,"kenko":423,"jinken":424},[17,25,50,50,150],[17,41,36,50,49],[17,146,155,174,25],[17,46,39,49,21],[17,19,119,41,49],[17,45,40,21,46],[17,26,26,72,46],[17,47,20,26,72],[17,47,72,47,72],[17,17,72,25,49],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":427,"name":428,"party":388,"photo_url":429,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":430,"top_topics":431,"summary":432,"evidence":433,"fields":434,"field_years":445},520,"榎本 茂","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn10_enomoto_shigeru.jpg",560,[],"港区の海辺・水域活用、防災、子ども施策、教育といった具体的な地域課題を中心に質問する傾向が記録されている。民間ビジネス経験を背景に、区有地の無償貸付けや利権構造に対する公平性の追求、採算性・効率性の観点から行政判断を問う質問が繰り返される。また国防や歴史教育といった思想的テーマについても具体的で詳細な主張を展開する発言が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":435,"machi":436,"kenko":437,"sumai":438,"kankyo":439,"gyosei":440,"kosodate":441,"keizai":442,"fukushi":443,"jinken":444},[17,114,18,128,67],[17,194,69,69,128],[17,29,28,41,45],[17,72,21,25,18],[17,72,41,69,31],[17,31,46,20,49],[17,174,192,155,50],[17,10,113,18,21],[17,72,150,20,47],[17,31,23,146,72],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":447,"name":448,"party":388,"photo_url":449,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":450,"top_topics":451,"summary":452,"evidence":453,"fields":454,"field_years":465},527,"白石 さと美","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn49_Gn49_shiraisi_satomi_20250407.jpg",361,[],"福祉・保健・教育など行政施策全般にわたり詳細な質疑を行う議員。既存事業の運用や制度設計の不備に対して、具体的なデータ不足の指摘、対象者漏れの確認、周知不足の改善要望を繰り返し提起する傾向が記録されている。市民への情報伝達方法や制度利用における利便性・公平性に関する指摘が多く見られる。",[],{"keizai":455,"fukushi":456,"bousai":457,"kosodate":458,"kankyo":459,"gyosei":460,"machi":461,"kenko":462,"sumai":463,"jinken":464},[17,26,31,31,49],[17,10,69,36,21],[17,29,18,25,25],[17,24,146,69,23],[17,45,25,29,29],[17,31,45,45,31],[17,72,31,72,72],[17,10,114,25,45],[17,49,46,25,49],[17,45,49,45,17],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":467,"name":468,"party":469,"photo_url":470,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":471,"top_topics":472,"summary":473,"evidence":474,"fields":475,"field_years":487},538,"兵藤 ゆうこ","立憲民主党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn4_hyoudou_yukiko.jpg",610,[],"地域住民の声を丁寧に汲み上げ、その実現に向けた細かい施策や改善を行政に求める質問が記録されている。自転車レーン整備、放置自転車対策、マラソンの制限時間延長、障がい者支援の拡充、商店街活性化など、生活に密着した多様な課題に対して、具体的な事例や地域からの要望を根拠に質問・提案する傾向が見られる。",[],{"kankyo":476,"gyosei":477,"fukushi":478,"kosodate":479,"keizai":481,"bousai":482,"kenko":483,"machi":484,"sumai":485,"jinken":486},[17,28,69,174,31],[17,46,26,45,49],[17,36,31,39,10],[17,480,46,150,29],50,[17,18,150,23,41],[17,36,46,21,45],[17,23,45,50,25],[17,174,28,50,45],[17,21,72,46,26],[17,47,26,26,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":489,"name":490,"party":469,"photo_url":491,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":492,"top_topics":493,"summary":494,"evidence":495,"fields":496,"field_years":510},514,"阿部 浩子","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn22_abe_hiroko.jpg",864,[],"福祉・教育・生活環境の施策細部について具体的データの提示を求める質疑が多く記録されている。特に就学援助、修学旅行、学校給食の保護者負担、児童館利用、指定管理施設の労務環境といった、生活困難層や子ども支援に関わる施策について、制度設計の根拠や数値、改善可能性を繰り返し質問する傾向が見られる。",[],{"keizai":497,"kosodate":498,"gyosei":501,"sumai":503,"fukushi":504,"kankyo":505,"jinken":506,"bousai":507,"machi":508,"kenko":509},[17,355,228,174,45],[17,499,500,328,146],89,94,[17,113,28,502,150],46,[17,72,41,45,47],[17,67,119,19,50],[17,20,10,21,29],[17,19,69,119,49],[17,40,19,21,26],[17,116,39,36,47],[17,10,128,50,49],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":512,"name":513,"party":514,"photo_url":515,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":516,"top_topics":517,"summary":518,"evidence":519,"fields":520,"field_years":533},518,"うかい 雅彦","自民党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn33_Gn33_ukai_masahiko_202305.jpg",2071,[],"建設・都市計画分野で委員会運営と政策提案の両面に関わる記録。委員長・副委員長として議事進行を務める一方で、地域課題（耐震化支援、商店街活動、避難所運営体制、樹木保全、駐車場整備）について行政と具体的にやり取りし、複数部局にまたがる課題への一体的な対応を求める発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":521,"gyosei":522,"machi":523,"sumai":526,"kosodate":527,"kankyo":528,"keizai":529,"bousai":530,"kenko":531,"jinken":532},[17,10,23,150,49],[17,25,41,36,26],[17,349,524,525,69],99,100,[17,67,116,142,72],[17,142,43,119,150],[17,28,28,20,17],[17,69,39,119,20],[17,114,24,155,46],[17,23,28,20,26],[17,72,17,26,47],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":535,"name":536,"party":514,"photo_url":537,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":538,"top_topics":539,"summary":540,"evidence":541,"fields":542,"field_years":553},540,"ませ のりよし","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn54_Gn_mase_noriyoshi_202305.jpg",372,[],"子育て支援・福祉・教育・交通など区民生活全般にわたり、現場の具体的課題を丁寧に指摘し改善提案する発言が記録されている。また施策の効果測定や実行スケジュール、財源根拠について検証的な質問を重ねる傾向が見られる。",[],{"machi":543,"fukushi":544,"keizai":545,"kenko":546,"kosodate":547,"bousai":548,"kankyo":549,"gyosei":550,"jinken":551,"sumai":552},[17,28,24,246,29],[17,46,31,10,25],[17,41,29,119,41],[17,46,41,20,26],[17,43,69,228,150],[17,28,69,113,31],[17,45,20,20,49],[17,45,25,10,49],[17,47,26,49,49],[17,72,46,28,72],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":555,"name":556,"party":514,"photo_url":557,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":558,"top_topics":559,"summary":560,"evidence":561,"fields":562,"field_years":573},544,"やなざわ 亜紀","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn14_Gn14_yanazawa_aki_202305.jpg",1533,[],"委員会の運営・進行役としての発言が大部分を占め、議事進行や署名委員指名などの定型的な職務を記録されている。個別案件での質疑では、子育て支援・教育・財政運営などの施策について、区民の具体的な困難や制度の運用面を指摘する質問が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":563,"kosodate":564,"keizai":565,"gyosei":566,"sumai":567,"bousai":568,"machi":569,"kankyo":570,"kenko":571,"jinken":572},[17,28,19,24,45],[17,43,111,524,147],[17,46,45,69,28],[17,116,113,146,20],[17,17,26,23,29],[17,49,25,50,25],[17,41,46,50,41],[17,25,31,28,41],[17,39,113,119,45],[17,47,49,20,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":575,"name":576,"party":514,"photo_url":577,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":578,"top_topics":579,"summary":580,"evidence":581,"fields":582,"field_years":593},545,"ゆうき くみこ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn24_23_yuuki-kumiko.jpg",724,[],"子育て支援、環境・森林活動、教育改革など幅広い分野で質問・提案を記録した議員。個別事案の具体的な実装細節（配送方法、指定管理事業者選定、安全対策）に着目した質問や、社会課題（共同親権、ひとり親家庭、ルール目的化）に対する個人的背景を交えた発言が多く、制度設計の現場適用可能性を問う傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":583,"machi":584,"kankyo":585,"keizai":586,"gyosei":587,"sumai":588,"fukushi":589,"kosodate":590,"kenko":591,"jinken":592},[17,31,41,50,45],[17,20,150,502,24],[17,29,174,116,29],[17,39,174,39,31],[17,28,41,20,26],[17,26,29,41,72],[17,24,21,41,45],[17,147,113,128,18],[17,194,10,50,26],[17,49,46,25,72],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":595,"name":596,"party":514,"photo_url":597,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":598,"top_topics":599,"summary":600,"evidence":601,"fields":602,"field_years":614},542,"三田 あきら","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn55_Gn_mita_akira_202305.jpg",778,[],"行政の執行過程における詳細な仕組みや基準を問う質問が多く記録されている。費用負担の範囲、契約条件の変更可能性、制度導入の時期判断など、政策決定の「プロセス」や「根拠」を確認する傾向が示されている。また、区民生活に直結する具体的な課題（消防詰所の老朽化、保育職員確保、私立小学校児童への支援格差など）について、現状把握と改善方向を問う発言が複数記録されている。",[],{"machi":603,"kosodate":604,"gyosei":606,"fukushi":607,"kankyo":608,"kenko":609,"keizai":610,"sumai":611,"bousai":612,"jinken":613},[17,41,24,69,21],[17,19,40,605,28],47,[17,31,25,24,20],[17,45,21,40,40],[17,72,46,21,50],[17,47,49,10,36],[17,41,39,20,25],[17,26,29,46,72],[17,31,41,113,31],[17,26,45,46,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":616,"name":617,"party":514,"photo_url":618,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":619,"top_topics":620,"summary":621,"evidence":622,"fields":623,"field_years":634},535,"二島 豊司","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn25_Gn25_nishima_2022.jpg",641,[],"区の政策・予算・契約の内容や根拠について詳細な質問・確認を繰り返す発言が多く、区の説明が不十分だと指摘し、丁寧な説明や事前協議を求める立場が記録から読み取れる。また、施設や事業の具体的な運用面での課題を指摘し、実装段階での検討を促すことが多い。",[],{"gyosei":624,"machi":625,"kankyo":626,"keizai":627,"kosodate":628,"sumai":629,"fukushi":630,"kenko":631,"bousai":632,"jinken":633},[17,49,25,502,113],[17,43,269,113,174],[17,45,72,19,36],[17,40,24,153,28],[17,24,36,155,39],[17,41,41,50,50],[17,72,50,50,40],[17,150,31,46,20],[17,150,113,21,31],[17,47,49,45,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":636,"name":637,"party":514,"photo_url":638,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":639,"top_topics":640,"summary":641,"evidence":642,"fields":643,"field_years":654},531,"土屋 準","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn17_Gn17_tuchiya_2023.png",1027,[],"議会運営における議長職務と、行政施策の具体的な実装・改善を軸とした質問が記録されている。子育て支援、防災対応、交通施策、教育環境整備など、地域生活に関わる個別事業について、制度設計や運用上の課題を問う発言が多く見られる。",[],{"gyosei":644,"fukushi":645,"kosodate":646,"keizai":647,"kenko":648,"machi":649,"bousai":650,"jinken":651,"sumai":652,"kankyo":653},[17,41,29,142,19],[17,25,45,116,111],[17,116,40,226,116],[17,25,150,31,72],[17,72,41,69,111],[17,480,23,19,19],[17,46,41,36,10],[17,47,46,25,45],[17,72,29,72,45],[17,31,25,20,21],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":656,"name":657,"party":514,"photo_url":658,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":659,"top_topics":660,"summary":661,"evidence":662,"fields":663,"field_years":675},515,"池田 こうじ","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn26_Ikeda_Koji.JPG",1130,[],"委員会進行や議案審議に関わる形式的な発言が多く記録されている一方で、高齢者福祉・教育・平和学習・交通安全・観光など多領域の政策課題について、現状の問題指摘と改善提案を含めた実質的な質疑が記録されている。区民ニーズの把握や施策の丁寧な構築を重視する姿勢が発言から読み取れる。",[],{"fukushi":664,"kenko":665,"gyosei":666,"kosodate":667,"keizai":669,"bousai":670,"machi":671,"kankyo":672,"sumai":673,"jinken":674},[17,40,69,194,128],[17,43,25,10,18],[17,155,194,155,49],[17,668,84,228,21],60,[17,39,31,10,46],[17,24,39,31,47],[17,39,10,25,47],[17,18,41,72,72],[17,25,29,21,47],[17,25,31,31,47],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":677,"name":678,"party":514,"photo_url":679,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":680,"top_topics":681,"summary":682,"evidence":683,"fields":684,"field_years":695},523,"清原 和幸","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn32_32_kiyohara_kazuyuki.jpg",654,[],"防災・安全、中小企業支援、子育て環境整備、地域インフラ整備を重点的に質問する傾向が記録されている。区民の日常生活に直結する具体的な課題解決と、地域住民からの声をくみ上げた施策要望が、発言全体を貫いている。",[],{"gyosei":685,"kosodate":686,"bousai":687,"fukushi":688,"machi":689,"keizai":690,"sumai":691,"kankyo":692,"kenko":693,"jinken":694},[17,46,72,46,46],[17,113,174,21,46],[17,19,10,50,150],[17,29,31,40,29],[17,28,28,46,45],[17,10,41,150,25],[17,31,29,45,26],[17,28,150,25,46],[17,21,25,19,72],[17,72,49,26,26],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":697,"name":698,"party":514,"photo_url":699,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":700,"top_topics":701,"summary":702,"evidence":703,"fields":704,"field_years":718},529,"鈴木 たかや","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn16_suzuki_takaya.jpg",2021,[],"議長職を経験した自民党議員で、議会の手続・ルール運用と行政の説明責任に関する発言が記録に多く見られる。また、地域コミュニティ（町会・防災協議会）の現場視点から区政施策への具体的な質問や提案が特徴として読み取れる。",[],{"fukushi":705,"kenko":706,"keizai":708,"gyosei":709,"machi":710,"sumai":712,"kosodate":713,"kankyo":715,"bousai":716,"jinken":717},[17,668,240,251,26],[17,707,355,147,26],71,[17,40,150,39,21],[17,33,250,605,41],[17,711,223,194,21],55,[17,119,20,21,26],[17,714,707,314,19],78,[17,269,69,19,31],[17,67,111,43,25],[17,41,72,36,47],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":720,"name":721,"party":722,"photo_url":723,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":724,"top_topics":725,"summary":726,"evidence":727,"fields":728,"field_years":739},521,"小倉 りえこ","都民ファーストの会","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn8_Gn8_ogura_rieko.jpg",572,[],"行政の事業実行プロセスの透明性・合理性を詳細に検証する発言が多く、政策判断の根拠不備や情報開示の遅れ、既存事業との整合性の欠落を指摘する記録が顕著である。同時に、事業の廃止判断よりも継続・改善による困窮層支援を重視する立場が読み取れる。",[],{"keizai":729,"gyosei":730,"jinken":731,"machi":732,"fukushi":733,"kosodate":734,"kenko":735,"sumai":736,"bousai":737,"kankyo":738},[17,84,67,146,29],[17,24,28,240,174],[17,49,72,25,49],[17,50,21,18,45],[17,69,46,39,20],[17,153,113,43,41],[17,269,21,40,41],[17,31,49,31,25],[17,23,21,23,29],[17,39,45,50,72],[52,53,54,55,56],{"member_id":741,"name":742,"party":722,"photo_url":743,"terms":9,"elected_at":9,"assembly_id":10,"role":9,"profile_url":9,"speech_count":744,"top_topics":745,"summary":746,"evidence":747,"fields":748,"field_years":760},524,"琴尾 みさと","https:\u002F\u002Fgikai2.city.minato.tokyo.jp\u002Fvoices\u002FGikaiDoc\u002Fattach\u002FGiin\u002FGn44_kotoo_misato.jpg",1435,[],"委員会の進行役および質疑者として記録されている。保育・教育・福祉分野で現場の具体的課題（保育士確保、障害者支援、施設利用など）について詳細な質疑を行い、事業者や利用者の声を根拠として行政の改善を求める発言が多い。システムや仕組みの効率化・透明化についても指摘が記録されている。",[],{"machi":749,"kosodate":750,"gyosei":752,"keizai":753,"kankyo":754,"bousai":755,"fukushi":756,"sumai":757,"jinken":758,"kenko":759},[17,150,18,41,26],[17,751,361,525,24],98,[17,46,150,46,26],[17,84,155,174,20],[17,19,24,40,21],[17,150,24,28,31],[17,29,46,150,29],[17,46,39,28,49],[17,45,45,26,17],[17,174,41,47,72],[52,53,54,55,56],1789179103948]