[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":1001},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fFuHxyL870R6YGxab5gWvTA-d9EyLxNvKwXDcg8BQDKQ":3,"$f8TWwqtOpQKNBWwhno1BnwtXYS8qqQQK9nRZ70RUXscE":43},[4,14,19,25,31,38],{"id":5,"name":6,"session_type":7,"committee_name":8,"held_on":9,"assembly_id":10,"source_url":11,"summary":12,"decisions":12,"speech_count":13},26598,"令和8年07月16日中野区議会議会運営委員会（第2回定例会）（2回目）","committee","議会運営委員会","2026-07-16",12,"https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fview.html?gijiroku_id=7222",null,61,{"id":15,"name":16,"session_type":7,"committee_name":8,"held_on":9,"assembly_id":10,"source_url":17,"summary":12,"decisions":12,"speech_count":18},26589,"令和8年07月16日中野区議会議会運営委員会（第2回定例会）（1回目）","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fview.html?gijiroku_id=7221",11,{"id":20,"name":21,"session_type":7,"committee_name":22,"held_on":9,"assembly_id":10,"source_url":23,"summary":12,"decisions":12,"speech_count":24},26546,"令和8年07月16日中野区議会建設委員会（第2回定例会）","建設委員会","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fview.html?gijiroku_id=7220",85,{"id":26,"name":27,"session_type":7,"committee_name":28,"held_on":9,"assembly_id":10,"source_url":29,"summary":12,"decisions":12,"speech_count":30},25428,"令和8年07月16日中野区議会総務委員会（第2回定例会）","総務委員会","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fview.html?gijiroku_id=7214",18,{"id":32,"name":33,"session_type":7,"committee_name":34,"held_on":35,"assembly_id":10,"source_url":36,"summary":12,"decisions":12,"speech_count":37},26636,"令和8年07月13日中野区議会スマートウェルネスシティ調査特別委員会（第2回定例会）","スマートウェルネスシティ調査特別委員会","2026-07-13","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fview.html?gijiroku_id=7217",114,{"id":39,"name":40,"session_type":7,"committee_name":8,"held_on":35,"assembly_id":10,"source_url":41,"summary":12,"decisions":12,"speech_count":42},25438,"令和8年07月13日中野区議会議会運営委員会（第2回定例会）","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fview.html?gijiroku_id=7205",23,[44,91,131,168,190,217,239,266,293,314,338,361,384,409,430,456,479,500,521,542,566,587,604,624,645,665,689,712,732,754,777,798,819,841,861,881,901,921,939,960,980],{"member_id":45,"name":46,"party":47,"photo_url":48,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":49,"top_topics":50,"summary":51,"evidence":52,"fields":53,"field_years":85},405,"南かつひこ","公明党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F35.jpg",674,[],"福祉・高齢者施策と行政デジタル化を中心に、制度の実装状況や具体的な運用課題について詳細な確認と改善提案を行う発言が記録されている。細則や事業スケジュール、数値目標の達成可能性、制度利用者の利便性向上といった実務的レベルの問題を繰り返し質問する傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":54,"fukushi":60,"kosodate":63,"kenko":68,"kankyo":73,"machi":76,"keizai":78,"gyosei":79,"jinken":81,"sumai":83},[55,56,57,58,59],0,25,33,8,1,[55,10,59,61,62],90,48,[55,64,65,66,67],10,6,29,16,[55,69,70,71,72],7,5,37,24,[55,74,75,64,74],13,9,[55,77,42,67,10],34,[55,10,69,72,64],[55,80,59,80,69],15,[55,59,55,69,82],4,[55,82,84,82,80],2,[86,87,88,89,90],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":92,"name":93,"party":47,"photo_url":94,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":95,"top_topics":96,"summary":97,"evidence":98,"fields":99,"field_years":130},403,"小林ぜんいち","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F24.jpg",1985,[],"庁舎整備・予算執行・制度導入に関し、数字の根拠明示と事業検証の徹底を求める発言が多い。施策の効果測定や積算根拠の提示を繰り返し要求し、不十分な説明に対して異議を唱える記録が目立つ。",[],{"gyosei":100,"fukushi":103,"kenko":107,"keizai":108,"kosodate":111,"jinken":116,"kankyo":117,"machi":118,"sumai":122,"bousai":125},[55,101,102,57,82],58,79,[55,104,105,106,80],39,31,47,[55,104,57,80,58],[55,109,110,13,77],41,70,[55,112,113,114,115],72,54,38,28,[55,74,74,69,69],[55,74,66,42,74],[55,56,119,120,121],113,187,139,[55,70,80,123,124],57,40,[55,126,127,128,129],32,36,96,45,[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":132,"name":133,"party":47,"photo_url":134,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":135,"top_topics":136,"summary":137,"evidence":138,"fields":139,"field_years":167},399,"平山英明","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F34.jpg",2438,[],"施設整備・財政運営・組織改革など区政全般にわたり、具体的根拠や事前報告の不足、スケジュール遅延、部門間の調整不備を指摘する質問が多く記録されている。計画と実行のプロセス、情報開示のタイミング、数値に基づいた政策判断の必要性に関する質問が特徴的。",[],{"kenko":140,"keizai":142,"gyosei":146,"machi":151,"sumai":153,"fukushi":155,"kosodate":157,"kankyo":161,"bousai":165,"jinken":166},[55,56,70,18,141],3,[55,143,144,145,80],62,63,52,[55,147,148,149,150],83,91,99,42,[55,109,24,152,66],74,[55,10,67,154,59],17,[55,42,80,156,64],30,[55,158,104,159,160],102,56,22,[55,162,163,164,82],26,14,21,[55,163,56,164,75],[55,74,84,18,84],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":169,"name":170,"party":47,"photo_url":171,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":172,"top_topics":173,"summary":174,"evidence":175,"fields":176,"field_years":189},400,"日野たかし","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F12.jpg",626,[],"行政システムの技術的な詳細や実装タイミング、対象者の把握方法などについて多くの質問が記録されている。政策の実行段階における具体的な課題（スペース不足、人員体制、対象者の限定など）を指摘し、改善や工夫を求める発言が目立つ。",[],{"bousai":177,"jinken":179,"fukushi":180,"kosodate":181,"kenko":182,"machi":183,"kankyo":184,"keizai":185,"gyosei":187,"sumai":188},[55,66,178,163,163],44,[55,70,59,65,84],[55,69,65,64,82],[55,65,75,162,82],[55,82,18,75,59],[55,65,69,42,67],[55,65,58,114,72],[55,82,84,127,186],19,[55,65,84,154,186],[55,75,58,82,59],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":191,"name":192,"party":47,"photo_url":193,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":194,"top_topics":195,"summary":196,"evidence":197,"fields":198,"field_years":216},401,"木村広一","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F13.jpg",1469,[],"施設整備・事業運営・予算配分について、具体的な数値・スケジュール・制度設計の詳細を確認する質疑が頻出する。一般会計の複数分野（福祉・文化・保健・インフラ）に関する細部の質問が記録されており、予算の仕組みや事業の継続性、他自治体との比較による政策検討を求める発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":199,"gyosei":201,"keizai":202,"kenko":205,"kosodate":207,"kankyo":210,"machi":211,"bousai":213,"sumai":214,"jinken":215},[55,106,200,71,163],71,[55,72,109,56,58],[55,18,203,204,164],20,49,[55,150,206,105,18],68,[55,67,56,208,209],208,123,[55,69,18,160,82],[55,160,154,212,69],27,[55,69,164,64,58],[55,59,82,70,70],[55,59,82,10,141],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":218,"name":219,"party":47,"photo_url":220,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":221,"top_topics":222,"summary":223,"evidence":224,"fields":225,"field_years":238},402,"甲田ゆり子","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F23.jpg",1514,[],"委員会での質疑において、事業予算の積算根拠・内訳の明細化、施策の具体的な実行方法や効果測定、制度改正による影響範囲の確認といった、行政事務の詳細な検証と透明性確保を求める発言が記録されている。また、高齢者・子ども・商店街など対象層ごとのニーズ把握と周知方法の工夫に関する指摘が多く見られる。",[],{"fukushi":226,"machi":227,"keizai":228,"gyosei":229,"kenko":231,"kankyo":232,"kosodate":233,"bousai":235,"jinken":236,"sumai":237},[55,203,72,162,154],[55,67,58,186,65],[55,66,71,156,74],[55,162,230,105,64],35,[55,69,160,104,42],[55,10,64,115,203],[55,234,66,80,141],46,[55,18,70,75,141],[55,70,10,70,59],[55,70,59,65,84],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":240,"name":241,"party":47,"photo_url":242,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":243,"top_topics":244,"summary":245,"evidence":246,"fields":247,"field_years":265},404,"白井ひでふみ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F25.jpg",2110,[],"建設・都市整備、教育・福祉、防災など広範な行政分野について、計画の整合性、情報開示の不十分さ、数値根拠の曖昧性を指摘する質疑が記録されている。施策の実施体制や進捗管理の具体化を求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"keizai":248,"machi":251,"gyosei":254,"fukushi":255,"sumai":256,"bousai":257,"kosodate":258,"kenko":262,"kankyo":263,"jinken":264},[55,113,249,250,66],78,51,[55,252,253,119,164],107,162,[55,101,109,105,58],[55,126,212,162,18],[55,164,109,162,141],[55,30,126,66,75],[55,259,115,260,261],109,134,110,[55,186,10,80,75],[55,70,30,115,10],[55,75,84,75,70],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":267,"name":268,"party":269,"photo_url":270,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":271,"top_topics":272,"summary":273,"evidence":274,"fields":275,"field_years":292},409,"いさ哲郎","日本共産党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F28.jpg",1575,[],"地域住民の声を重視する立場から、市街地再開発や公共施設整備に関わる行政の計画・実行過程に対し、事前の情報開示、住民合意、地元との協議状況を詳しく確認する発言が記録されている。同時に、自転車駐輪場、住宅確保、インフラ整備など生活に直結する課題について、具体的な数値や運用方法を問う質疑が多く見られる。",[],{"fukushi":276,"jinken":277,"kosodate":278,"machi":279,"bousai":283,"keizai":284,"sumai":287,"kankyo":289,"kenko":290,"gyosei":291},[55,154,42,72,64],[55,75,69,58,141],[55,154,58,162,163],[55,253,280,281,282],154,158,95,[55,74,203,57,160],[55,106,285,286,115],94,60,[55,67,288,288,57],50,[55,58,154,42,18],[55,141,67,65,82],[55,70,65,58,84],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":294,"name":295,"party":269,"photo_url":296,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":297,"top_topics":298,"summary":299,"evidence":300,"fields":301,"field_years":313},408,"広川まさのり","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F17.jpg",689,[],"区民生活に関わる行政課題について、具体的なデータ確認と施策の実効性に関する質問が多く記録されている。福祉・教育・防災など広い分野で、数値根拠の提示や他自治体事例との比較を通じた施策改善を求める発言が特徴。",[],{"kosodate":302,"kenko":304,"keizai":305,"fukushi":306,"machi":307,"sumai":308,"bousai":309,"kankyo":310,"gyosei":311,"jinken":312},[55,69,70,253,303],92,[55,18,80,154,58],[55,141,18,109,66],[55,70,163,66,10],[55,84,82,72,10],[55,141,84,58,59],[55,65,203,156,72],[55,59,59,80,82],[55,59,70,74,65],[55,59,84,59,55],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":315,"name":316,"party":269,"photo_url":317,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":318,"top_topics":319,"summary":320,"evidence":321,"fields":322,"field_years":337},407,"武田やよい","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F7.jpg",2016,[],"行政サービスの実施過程における詳細な確認と改善を求める発言が記録されている。制度設計の周知、職員研修、運用時の課題把握といった実装段階での具体的な問題提起が多く、同時に生活困窮者支援や格差解消といった政策目的の達成を重視する視点が一貫している。",[],{"kosodate":323,"keizai":324,"gyosei":326,"sumai":327,"kankyo":328,"fukushi":332,"kenko":333,"machi":334,"bousai":335,"jinken":336},[55,42,106,104,42],[55,129,325,145,62],75,[55,114,200,124,77],[55,80,75,75,84],[55,178,329,330,331],100,128,69,[55,230,101,212,186],[55,150,249,109,42],[55,80,162,71,71],[55,70,69,64,18],[55,10,115,154,69],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":339,"name":340,"party":269,"photo_url":341,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":342,"top_topics":343,"summary":344,"evidence":345,"fields":346,"field_years":360},406,"浦野さとみ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F39.jpg",1348,[],"区の施策や事業運営について、具体的な数字・根拠・比較対象を示すことを重視する質疑が記録されている。また、福祉・教育・労働環境など生活に密着した領域で、他自治体の先行事例との比較や区独自の対応可能性を問う発言が頻出する。",[],{"fukushi":347,"kenko":350,"kosodate":352,"machi":353,"gyosei":354,"kankyo":355,"bousai":356,"keizai":357,"jinken":358,"sumai":359},[55,126,105,348,349],129,93,[55,109,72,351,105],64,[55,57,66,105,80],[55,75,160,156,154],[55,230,77,250,164],[55,75,70,67,74],[55,58,56,64,65],[55,42,126,62,105],[55,163,67,164,75],[55,70,82,163,74],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":362,"name":363,"party":269,"photo_url":364,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":365,"top_topics":366,"summary":367,"evidence":368,"fields":369,"field_years":383},410,"羽鳥だいすけ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F27.jpg",1668,[],"教育・子育て関連の施策について、制度設計の根拠や実行可能性を詳しく質問する発言が多く記録されている。政策の導入時に住民・現場職員との合意形成を重視する姿勢や、物価高騰への対応など経済的支援の対象拡大を求める発言が複数見られる。",[],{"gyosei":370,"machi":371,"kosodate":372,"kankyo":376,"fukushi":377,"kenko":378,"keizai":379,"bousai":380,"sumai":381,"jinken":382},[55,186,72,230,75],[55,104,113,147,42],[55,373,374,375,82],296,284,153,[55,162,77,156,74],[55,203,154,160,163],[55,69,163,80,69],[55,126,178,105,10],[55,160,64,186,10],[55,10,74,75,141],[55,74,69,66,65],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":385,"name":386,"party":387,"photo_url":388,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":389,"top_topics":390,"summary":391,"evidence":392,"fields":393,"field_years":408},417,"むとう有子","無所属","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F38.jpg",2382,[],"区の施策実施時の詳細確認や事務効率への問題提起が記録に多く見られる。予算額・実施時期・具体的根拠の説明を反復的に求める発言が特徴的であり、区民負担や職員負担の軽減、既存施設・制度の継続維持についても言及が記録されている。",[],{"bousai":394,"kosodate":395,"kenko":399,"kankyo":400,"keizai":402,"gyosei":403,"machi":404,"jinken":405,"fukushi":406,"sumai":407},[55,56,80,75,75],[55,396,397,398,164],293,271,146,[55,115,30,75,75],[55,234,127,401,105],66,[55,106,145,288,164],[55,186,212,115,64],[55,126,113,144,126],[55,69,64,67,69],[55,212,77,74,58],[55,69,154,154,70],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":410,"name":411,"party":387,"photo_url":412,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":413,"top_topics":414,"summary":415,"evidence":416,"fields":417,"field_years":429},415,"小宮山たかし","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F26.jpg",608,[],"区内事業・施設の具体的な運用実態と効果測定に関する質問が多く記録されている。制度設計と実際の利用状況の乖離、費用対効果の検証不足、区民向け情報公開の不十分さを指摘する発言の傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":418,"gyosei":420,"keizai":421,"machi":422,"sumai":423,"kankyo":424,"jinken":425,"bousai":426,"kenko":427,"fukushi":428},[55,72,56,419,178],116,[55,10,141,69,59],[55,104,156,212,65],[55,154,160,42,75],[55,84,69,69,141],[55,164,80,164,59],[55,75,82,18,82],[55,59,141,69,69],[55,69,65,69,82],[55,84,70,82,82],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":431,"name":432,"party":387,"photo_url":433,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":434,"top_topics":435,"summary":436,"evidence":437,"fields":438,"field_years":455},416,"石坂わたる","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F37.jpg",2164,[],"行政サービスの実装細部と実効性を重視する質疑が記録されている。制度設計や政策の理想像だけでなく、運用段階での課題把握・改善、複数案検討、データに基づく検証を求める発言が繰り返される傾向にある。また、社会的少数者や制約のある利用者への配慮を施策に組み込むことの必要性を指摘する発言が多い。",[],{"kankyo":439,"keizai":440,"jinken":442,"fukushi":443,"kenko":445,"bousai":446,"machi":448,"gyosei":450,"kosodate":451,"sumai":454},[55,230,204,206,186],[55,102,441,61,230],55,[55,105,77,71,67],[55,331,444,349,13],59,[55,110,106,234,164],[55,162,447,105,160],65,[55,154,115,449,203],53,[55,288,206,150,75],[55,124,288,452,453],331,168,[55,70,70,74,69],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":457,"name":458,"party":387,"photo_url":459,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":460,"top_topics":461,"summary":462,"evidence":463,"fields":464,"field_years":478},414,"立石りお","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F15.jpg",1266,[],"財政運営・施設整備・行政事務の細部にわたる数値や制度設計を問う発言が記録されている。予算の積立方式の妥当性、施設耐用年数の長期的影響、事業の実績測定方法など、政策の構造や前提条件そのものを検証する質疑傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"keizai":465,"machi":466,"sumai":467,"kosodate":468,"fukushi":472,"kenko":473,"gyosei":474,"bousai":475,"kankyo":476,"jinken":477},[55,186,104,145,10],[55,203,186,105,64],[55,75,58,30,141],[55,469,470,471,186],117,167,119,[55,10,154,203,163],[55,69,75,203,64],[55,115,67,325,77],[55,75,70,74,70],[55,67,72,186,69],[55,141,141,163,141],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":480,"name":481,"party":482,"photo_url":483,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":484,"top_topics":485,"summary":486,"evidence":487,"fields":488,"field_years":499},419,"井関源二","無所属（れいわ新選組）","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F4.jpg",544,[],"区民生活に関わる具体的な制度設計や施設運営の詳細について、実装面での課題を指摘する発言が多く記録されている。高齢者やデジタルデバイスに不慣れな住民への対応可能性、施設の安全性・機能性、災害対策における実務的な問題点などについて、担当部局に確認・検証を求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":489,"kosodate":490,"kenko":491,"keizai":492,"kankyo":493,"bousai":494,"machi":495,"jinken":496,"gyosei":497,"sumai":498},[55,65,75,74,59],[55,65,65,10,84],[55,18,64,58,84],[55,82,65,186,66],[55,82,141,82,55],[55,18,74,163,74],[55,69,64,101,66],[55,84,59,82,59],[55,59,70,82,59],[55,141,141,154,105],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":501,"name":502,"party":503,"photo_url":504,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":505,"top_topics":506,"summary":507,"evidence":508,"fields":509,"field_years":520},418,"斉藤けいた","無所属（日本維新の会）","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F3.jpg",319,[],"委員会審査や一般質問で、施策の具体的な算出根拠・費用対効果・実績検証を求める発言が記録されている。また、防災・子育て支援・ペット同行避難など複数の政策分野で継続的な質疑を行う傾向が見られ、デジタル化推進と同時にアナログ規制の見直しを問う発言も多い。",[],{"bousai":510,"kosodate":511,"kenko":512,"keizai":513,"gyosei":514,"jinken":515,"sumai":516,"machi":517,"kankyo":518,"fukushi":519},[55,141,141,18,18],[55,141,82,30,18],[55,84,84,69,69],[55,141,82,203,74],[55,84,55,126,58],[55,141,55,69,141],[55,59,55,65,69],[55,84,84,75,74],[55,84,141,75,82],[55,55,84,80,69],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":522,"name":523,"party":524,"photo_url":525,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":526,"top_topics":527,"summary":528,"evidence":529,"fields":530,"field_years":541},381,"いのつめ正太","立憲・国民・ネット・無所属議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F8.jpg",520,[],"防災・環境・行政手続き等の幅広い分野で、施策の実装内容や数値根拠、関係機関連携の具体性を問う質疑が記録されている。事業の進捗管理体制や計画の解像度、市民への周知方法といった『運用面の実効性』に着目した質問傾向が見られる。",[],{"bousai":531,"jinken":532,"keizai":533,"kankyo":534,"machi":535,"sumai":536,"fukushi":537,"kosodate":538,"kenko":539,"gyosei":540},[55,67,66,10,59],[55,141,59,84,141],[55,84,141,160,58],[55,65,10,106,57],[55,58,75,80,70],[55,84,141,84,59],[55,141,84,69,10],[55,141,75,212,84],[55,141,141,58,80],[55,59,84,230,72],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":543,"name":544,"party":524,"photo_url":545,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":546,"top_topics":547,"summary":548,"evidence":549,"fields":550,"field_years":565},387,"ひやま隆","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F30.jpg",1488,[],"建設・都市計画事業の詳細な実装状況に関する質問が集中している。設計段階と実行段階のギャップ、数値見積もりの乖離、地域住民への情報提示のタイミングと内容について指摘する発言が記録されている。また、区の施策における民間事業者との役割分担や、利用者ニーズの把握が十分であるかを問う質問が目立つ。",[],{"kosodate":551,"keizai":552,"fukushi":553,"kenko":555,"machi":556,"sumai":560,"gyosei":561,"bousai":562,"kankyo":563,"jinken":564},[55,58,18,42,56],[55,80,124,123,212],[55,75,65,554,250],43,[55,163,58,126,71],[55,557,558,559,72],80,148,108,[55,163,203,42,69],[55,69,154,186,67],[55,10,30,163,82],[55,10,18,58,80],[55,70,70,82,69],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":567,"name":568,"party":524,"photo_url":569,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":570,"top_topics":571,"summary":572,"evidence":573,"fields":574,"field_years":586},379,"中村延子","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F40.jpg",1139,[],"福祉・子育て・健康施策の実装状況、統計数値の精度、職員体制などについて詳細な確認質問が記録されている。政策の実効性や広報の不十分さ、既存事業の改善点を指摘する発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":575,"kenko":576,"kosodate":578,"jinken":579,"keizai":580,"bousai":581,"machi":582,"kankyo":583,"gyosei":584,"sumai":585},[55,449,124,109,10],[55,325,234,577,164],73,[55,114,127,145,203],[55,18,84,67,64],[55,115,186,104,154],[55,64,70,74,67],[55,154,58,42,75],[55,154,64,74,75],[55,162,56,104,67],[55,84,55,59,59],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":588,"name":589,"party":524,"photo_url":590,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":66,"top_topics":591,"summary":12,"evidence":592,"fields":593,"field_years":603},380,"大塚けいじゅ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F43.jpg",[],[],{"fukushi":594,"kenko":595,"kosodate":596,"jinken":597,"bousai":598,"machi":599,"kankyo":600,"keizai":601,"gyosei":602},[55,55,55,55,69],[55,55,55,55,82],[55,55,55,55,82],[55,55,55,55,84],[55,55,55,55,59],[55,55,55,55,59],[55,55,55,55,59],[55,55,55,55,59],[55,55,55,55,59],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":605,"name":606,"party":524,"photo_url":607,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":608,"top_topics":609,"summary":610,"evidence":611,"fields":612,"field_years":623},388,"山本たかし","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F31.jpg",683,[],"行政各部門の具体的な数値・スケジュール・理由の確認に多くの時間を費やすことが発言記録に示されている。計画や事業の詳細な根拠、費用対効果、実装後の検証体制などについて、逐次的に説明を求める質疑が目立つ。併せて、防災・福祉・交通安全といった生活密着分野での施策改善提案も記録されている。",[],{"bousai":613,"kosodate":614,"machi":615,"keizai":616,"kenko":617,"fukushi":618,"kankyo":619,"gyosei":620,"jinken":621,"sumai":622},[55,80,67,71,70],[55,160,42,42,18],[55,82,74,288,115],[55,18,67,164,141],[55,70,70,70,59],[55,69,64,58,141],[55,141,141,70,84],[55,82,82,65,59],[55,65,69,141,84],[55,84,84,65,70],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":625,"name":626,"party":524,"photo_url":627,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":628,"top_topics":629,"summary":630,"evidence":631,"fields":632,"field_years":644},385,"斉藤ゆり","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F20.jpg",609,[],"都市開発・まちづくり、防災、公園・道路整備など都市基盤整備全般にわたり、事業の詳細な進捗・手続・数値根拠を問う質問が記録されている。同時に、子育支援、高齢者雇用、地域農地保全など社会的課題への配慮も併せて確認する傾向が見られる。区民との情報共有の充実や、複数部局間の連携体制を確認する質問が多く記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":633,"keizai":634,"gyosei":635,"bousai":636,"fukushi":637,"kenko":638,"machi":639,"kankyo":641,"sumai":642,"jinken":643},[55,65,141,154,30],[55,82,55,162,203],[55,84,55,80,75],[55,141,84,10,56],[55,84,59,10,58],[55,141,59,84,141],[55,141,59,158,640],122,[55,141,84,154,74],[55,141,59,186,72],[55,59,59,141,65],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":646,"name":647,"party":524,"photo_url":648,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":649,"top_topics":650,"summary":651,"evidence":652,"fields":653,"field_years":664},386,"杉山司","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F29.jpg",516,[],"施設整備・まちづくり・デジタル化など多分野にわたる実装段階の詳細を問う発言が記録されている。完成イメージや方針決定後の「実行過程での具体的な課題」「数値データの検証」「予算・スケジュールの遅延への対応」を繰り返し質問し、担当部局に根拠の提示や計画の見直しを促す傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":654,"keizai":655,"machi":656,"bousai":657,"fukushi":658,"kenko":659,"kankyo":660,"gyosei":661,"jinken":662,"sumai":663},[55,10,65,74,82],[55,72,163,160,127],[55,164,104,230,164],[55,82,65,69,82],[55,141,82,70,141],[55,18,70,65,141],[55,58,141,72,67],[55,67,70,75,18],[55,82,84,70,84],[55,84,82,84,84],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":666,"name":667,"party":524,"photo_url":668,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":669,"top_topics":670,"summary":671,"evidence":672,"fields":673,"field_years":688},390,"森たかゆき","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F41.jpg",2794,[],"財政・施設整備・人事制度など行政運営全般にわたり、制度設計の論理的一貫性、情報開示の充実、プロセスの明確化を問う発言が記録されている。また子育て・福祉・教育現場の多様なニーズに対し、画一的でない対応を求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":674,"kosodate":675,"kenko":678,"machi":679,"keizai":681,"gyosei":683,"jinken":684,"sumai":685,"bousai":686,"kankyo":687},[55,162,104,106,162],[55,577,200,676,677],338,135,[55,30,160,212,203],[55,30,143,680,230],103,[55,178,128,682,212],67,[55,143,143,351,156],[55,57,74,66,10],[55,65,163,163,18],[55,154,71,288,203],[55,74,154,234,30],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":690,"name":691,"party":524,"photo_url":692,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":693,"top_topics":694,"summary":695,"evidence":696,"fields":697,"field_years":711},383,"河合りな","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F18.jpg",2639,[],"子ども・教育・福祉施策の詳細な制度設計に関する質問が多く記録されている。予算額・対象範囲・実施方法など具体的な仕組みの確認を繰り返し求め、先行事例の検証や周知方法の改善を指摘する発言が目立つ。民間活力導入時の質保証や、支援対象の漏れを防ぐ仕組みづくりを重視する姿勢が読み取れる。",[],{"kosodate":698,"kenko":702,"kankyo":703,"sumai":704,"fukushi":705,"keizai":706,"gyosei":707,"jinken":708,"bousai":709,"machi":710},[55,699,700,701,115],291,312,209,[55,212,156,126,10],[55,160,154,77,154],[55,82,69,70,84],[55,230,42,160,30],[55,124,178,66,65],[55,127,56,109,115],[55,82,82,67,70],[55,72,56,441,203],[55,66,80,156,58],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":713,"name":714,"party":524,"photo_url":715,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":716,"top_topics":717,"summary":718,"evidence":719,"fields":720,"field_years":731},384,"細野かよこ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F19.jpg",992,[],"子どもの権利・福祉、居住支援、環境・脱炭素、行政の説明責任など複数分野にわたり、区民視点から現状把握と具体的改善を求める質疑が記録されている。特に予算編成の精度向上、窓口対応の分かりやすさ、不登校児童や住宅困窮層など課題層への支援体制の充実について、事例や市民の声を引きながら詰めた質問を行う傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":721,"kankyo":722,"kenko":723,"gyosei":724,"fukushi":725,"keizai":726,"machi":727,"sumai":728,"jinken":729,"bousai":730},[55,74,162,74,69],[55,65,203,69,70],[55,70,75,163,162],[55,84,10,65,82],[55,69,64,72,109],[55,84,75,65,65],[55,59,65,18,70],[55,59,82,84,82],[55,59,69,75,55],[55,55,70,203,18],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":733,"name":734,"party":524,"photo_url":735,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":736,"top_topics":737,"summary":738,"evidence":739,"fields":740,"field_years":753},389,"酒井たくや","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F42.jpg",2832,[],"中野区議会で委員長・議事進行役として議事整理を務める傍ら、補正予算・決算審査の委員会等で、中野サンプラザ再整備事業・文化施設基金・商店街支援・清掃業務など具体的な事業の数字・契約内容・費用対効果を詳細に質問する発言が記録されている。前例との比較や積算根拠の明確化を求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":741,"kenko":742,"machi":743,"keizai":746,"gyosei":747,"kosodate":748,"sumai":749,"bousai":750,"jinken":751,"kankyo":752},[55,104,150,105,163],[55,204,230,160,84],[55,744,286,745,77],145,84,[55,102,286,71,154],[55,249,441,206,203],[55,559,24,325,115],[55,64,58,58,55],[55,66,77,234,64],[55,80,67,42,69],[55,129,109,162,18],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":755,"name":756,"party":524,"photo_url":757,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":758,"top_topics":759,"summary":760,"evidence":761,"fields":762,"field_years":776},382,"間ひとみ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F9.jpg",1437,[],"福祉・教育・子育て支援の施策実施に関して、現状の課題把握と具体的な改善策の検討を求める発言が多く記録されている。既存事業の効果測定、対象者への周知・アクセス確保、関係部署間の連携強化といった実装面での詳細な質問を繰り返す傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"gyosei":763,"fukushi":764,"kankyo":766,"kenko":767,"kosodate":768,"machi":771,"keizai":772,"bousai":773,"sumai":774,"jinken":775},[55,10,80,186,58],[55,101,765,745,56],81,[55,75,75,57,75],[55,42,57,145,64],[55,66,56,769,770],358,172,[55,70,18,156,10],[55,82,164,124,162],[55,141,58,67,70],[55,84,59,58,59],[55,55,84,163,82],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":778,"name":779,"party":780,"photo_url":781,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":782,"top_topics":783,"summary":784,"evidence":785,"fields":786,"field_years":797},391,"伊藤正信","自由民主党議員団","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F32.jpg",1461,[],"中野区の都市計画・まちづくり事業と施設整備を中心に、事業スケジュール・進捗状況・具体的な実装方法について詳細な質問を重ねる傾向が記録されている。区の対応や説明の矛盾点・不透明な意思決定プロセスを指摘し、より丁寧な説明責任と区民への周知徹底を求める発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":787,"machi":788,"gyosei":789,"keizai":790,"bousai":791,"kankyo":792,"kosodate":793,"sumai":794,"jinken":795,"kenko":796},[55,65,64,30,67],[55,129,102,640,682],[55,65,10,186,67],[55,58,30,56,186],[55,18,67,57,163],[55,70,163,154,69],[55,82,10,105,186],[55,58,203,42,80],[55,84,59,70,82],[55,141,58,80,64],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":799,"name":800,"party":780,"photo_url":801,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":802,"top_topics":803,"summary":804,"evidence":805,"fields":806,"field_years":818},396,"加藤たくま","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F11.jpg",2309,[],"予算編成・施設整備・政策評価における具体的な数値根拠や事業ロジックの追跡を重視する発言が記録されている。財政フレームの一貫性、施設面積の基準値設定、指標の妥当性検証など、行政判断の前提条件となる情報開示と説明責任を問う質問が多い。",[],{"bousai":807,"jinken":808,"kankyo":809,"sumai":810,"kosodate":811,"gyosei":812,"machi":814,"keizai":815,"fukushi":816,"kenko":817},[55,109,113,18,58],[55,163,58,82,84],[55,115,164,64,70],[55,74,80,74,69],[55,419,145,75,69],[55,557,813,113,75],87,[55,178,144,249,123],[55,204,554,42,141],[55,67,203,74,163],[55,77,163,163,58],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":820,"name":821,"party":780,"photo_url":822,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":823,"top_topics":824,"summary":825,"evidence":826,"fields":827,"field_years":840},398,"大内しんご","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F22.jpg",2424,[],"予算執行や政策実行における数値根拠の厳密性を繰り返し指摘する発言が多く、曖昧な説明や事後的な対応を問題視する傾向が記録されている。同時に、事前の十分な検討・協議を経ずに施策が進むことへの懸念を複数の事案で表明している。",[],{"fukushi":828,"kosodate":829,"kenko":832,"gyosei":833,"jinken":834,"sumai":835,"machi":836,"kankyo":837,"bousai":838,"keizai":839},[55,69,57,127,58],[55,830,457,831,126],287,230,[55,104,160,74,18],[55,71,554,250,203],[55,64,67,162,84],[55,70,82,75,65],[55,204,444,101,77],[55,18,72,186,82],[55,127,62,203,58],[55,114,129,106,10],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":842,"name":843,"party":780,"photo_url":844,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":845,"top_topics":846,"summary":847,"evidence":848,"fields":849,"field_years":860},393,"山内あきひろ","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F1.jpg",574,[],"詳細な数値・基準の確認と段階的な事業検証を求める発言が多く記録されている。新規施策導入時の時期適切性、区民への事前周知、費用対効果の検証体制について具体的な質疑を繰り返す傾向が見られる。",[],{"kosodate":850,"machi":851,"sumai":852,"keizai":853,"bousai":854,"fukushi":855,"kenko":856,"kankyo":857,"gyosei":858,"jinken":859},[55,154,109,230,30],[55,141,58,42,75],[55,141,65,69,59],[55,65,30,74,70],[55,59,65,230,154],[55,141,69,441,160],[55,84,141,109,75],[55,59,82,18,82],[55,84,82,18,82],[55,59,59,141,82],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":862,"name":863,"party":780,"photo_url":864,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":865,"top_topics":866,"summary":867,"evidence":868,"fields":869,"field_years":880},395,"市川しんたろう","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F10.jpg",704,[],"中野駅周辺再開発事業と公共施設整備に関する質疑が大部分を占めており、事業の進捗状況・収支計画・施設機能の検証、および地域への情報提供・意見聴取プロセスについて詳細な説明を求める発言が記録されている。同時に、子育て施策、防災・交通インフラ、区営住宅政策、ユニバーサルデザイン等の幅広い行政課題について具体的な数値や事業内容の確認を行う傾向が見られる。",[],{"gyosei":870,"keizai":871,"sumai":872,"machi":873,"kankyo":874,"jinken":875,"fukushi":876,"bousai":877,"kosodate":878,"kenko":879},[55,84,82,156,141],[55,10,212,554,80],[55,69,58,67,58],[55,127,288,557,42],[55,141,70,163,82],[55,59,55,10,84],[55,65,84,163,70],[55,65,58,74,65],[55,82,141,150,18],[55,59,82,84,141],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":882,"name":883,"party":780,"photo_url":884,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":885,"top_topics":886,"summary":887,"evidence":888,"fields":889,"field_years":900},394,"武井まさき","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F2.jpg",601,[],"地方行政の具体的な施策・事業について、実施状況の詳細な把握（件数・数値・比較データ）と今後の改善方針を問う発言が記録されている。商店街振興、資源回収、福祉施設、学校整備など多岐にわたる領域で、区の対応が現状に対応できているか、より効果的な手段があるかといった検証的な質問を重ねる傾向が見られる。",[],{"keizai":890,"gyosei":891,"bousai":892,"machi":893,"kankyo":894,"kosodate":895,"jinken":896,"kenko":897,"sumai":898,"fukushi":899},[55,164,66,212,75],[55,18,163,65,141],[55,82,82,75,84],[55,70,69,58,84],[55,75,18,163,82],[55,10,163,325,105],[55,141,65,141,84],[55,58,58,65,84],[55,141,141,70,82],[55,84,141,82,59],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":902,"name":903,"party":780,"photo_url":904,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":905,"top_topics":906,"summary":907,"evidence":908,"fields":909,"field_years":920},397,"高橋かずちか","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F21.jpg",251,[],"区と事業者の責任分界を明確にすること、工程管理を定期的に議会・住民に報告すること、区長のリーダーシップを強調することが記録に繰り返し現れる。中野駅周辺整備や西武新宿線事業など大規模事業の進捗管理と、産学官連携や国際交流などの戦略的施策展開について、具体的かつ段階的な計画立案と実行を求める発言が多い。",[],{"bousai":910,"fukushi":911,"kosodate":912,"kenko":913,"machi":914,"kankyo":915,"keizai":916,"gyosei":917,"sumai":918,"jinken":919},[55,141,84,69,141],[55,84,84,58,65],[55,84,59,80,75],[55,141,59,69,69],[55,141,59,164,105],[55,141,59,10,64],[55,141,59,126,77],[55,84,55,58,59],[55,59,55,65,82],[55,55,55,82,55],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":922,"name":923,"party":780,"photo_url":924,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":147,"top_topics":925,"summary":926,"evidence":927,"fields":928,"field_years":938},392,"高橋ちあき","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F33.jpg",[],"区民向けの情報提供・施設利用のアクセスしやすさについての質問が多く記録されている。また、庁内の所管分担の複雑さに対し、窓口の統一や組織の分かりやすさを求める指摘が繰り返し見られる。",[],{"machi":929,"kosodate":930,"gyosei":931,"bousai":932,"kenko":933,"kankyo":934,"fukushi":935,"keizai":936,"sumai":937},[55,59,59,55,59],[55,84,59,141,65],[55,59,55,55,55],[55,59,59,59,82],[55,55,59,55,141],[55,55,59,55,59],[55,55,55,70,82],[55,55,55,55,59],[55,55,55,55,59],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":940,"name":941,"party":942,"photo_url":943,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":944,"top_topics":945,"summary":946,"evidence":947,"fields":948,"field_years":959},411,"内野大三郎","都民ファーストの会中野区議団","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F16.jpg",130,[],"施設管理・まちづくり・防災などの行政課題について、現場の具体的な問題指摘と改善提案を繰り返し記録されている。事業評価や予算執行については数値・実績を参照しながら質疑し、行政の施策実現度や対応の詳細について段階的に確認する傾向が見られる。",[],{"kenko":949,"machi":950,"kankyo":951,"keizai":952,"bousai":953,"jinken":954,"fukushi":955,"kosodate":956,"gyosei":957,"sumai":958},[55,82,59,82,141],[55,82,141,80,163],[55,70,84,69,65],[55,82,84,10,58],[55,82,84,64,65],[55,84,59,59,84],[55,59,84,65,82],[55,84,141,58,10],[55,141,84,69,141],[55,84,55,65,84],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":961,"name":962,"party":942,"photo_url":963,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":964,"top_topics":965,"summary":966,"evidence":967,"fields":968,"field_years":979},413,"大沢ひろゆき","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F6.jpg",1134,[],"予算・事業計画の詳細や数値根拠、契約内容、実行スケジュール等について、その具体的な内容や背景を何度も確認する質疑が記録されている。曖昧な説明に対して前提条件や定義の明確化を求め、数値データや進捗見込みの根拠を追求する傾向が見られる。",[],{"gyosei":969,"kosodate":970,"keizai":971,"sumai":972,"bousai":973,"machi":974,"kankyo":975,"fukushi":976,"kenko":977,"jinken":978},[55,65,212,154,82],[55,18,75,10,141],[55,75,67,163,82],[55,67,66,75,84],[55,163,101,10,59],[55,113,640,113,75],[55,10,67,65,59],[55,82,75,75,65],[55,65,58,64,59],[55,84,82,65,59],[86,87,88,89,90],{"member_id":981,"name":982,"party":942,"photo_url":983,"terms":12,"elected_at":12,"assembly_id":10,"role":12,"profile_url":12,"speech_count":984,"top_topics":985,"summary":986,"evidence":987,"fields":988,"field_years":1000},412,"黒沢ゆか","https:\u002F\u002Fkugikai-nakano.jp\u002Fgiin\u002F5.jpg",762,[],"福祉・子ども関連の行政サービスについて、制度の詳細確認と実装面での課題指摘が記録の大部分を占める。関連部門の連携強化、情報提供の充実、対象者の実態把握に基づいた施策改善を求める質問・要望が多い。また、社会福祉士実習経験など専門的背景をもとにした具体的指摘がみられる。",[],{"machi":989,"sumai":990,"kenko":991,"fukushi":992,"keizai":994,"kosodate":995,"kankyo":996,"gyosei":997,"jinken":998,"bousai":999},[55,80,10,10,82],[55,84,58,141,141],[55,160,66,105,66],[55,204,745,993,159],76,[55,80,127,115,42],[55,67,77,105,115],[55,65,69,70,75],[55,141,18,82,82],[55,82,84,84,70],[55,69,82,69,82],[86,87,88,89,90],1789179105137]