[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":734},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fEGcqvnsHDzf8zrXWAX7j9kkt1G6SBEJBbu5clEhLlWo":3},[4,48,75,102,126,145,172,195,219,244,267,288,308,328,347,367,387,406,425,444,464,483,502,521,540,559,578,598,618,637,656,674,694,714],{"member_id":5,"name":6,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":10,"top_topics":11,"summary":12,"evidence":13,"fields":14,"field_years":42},481,"ふまミチ","公明党豊島区議団",null,15,533,[],"補正予算や各種議案の審議で、政策背景や実施詳細の確認質問が多く記録されている。物価高騰対策、福祉施設整備、工事進捗などについて、対象者の要件設定理由、事務負担への配慮、地域住民への影響、周知方法といった実装面の具体的な説明を求める傾向が見られる。会派としての賛成表明時には、区民生活への直接的な利益や行政効率化を理由とした発言が複数記録されている。",[],{"jinken":15,"fukushi":19,"kosodate":22,"kankyo":27,"bousai":31,"kenko":32,"machi":34,"keizai":35,"gyosei":38,"sumai":41},[16,16,17,18,18],0,3,2,[16,17,17,20,21],16,5,[16,23,24,25,26],19,11,27,6,[16,28,29,30,18],4,1,9,[16,21,18,23,17],[16,28,26,33,18],7,[16,30,33,20,28],[16,36,17,37,21],10,13,[16,29,28,39,40],21,12,[16,18,16,28,28],[43,44,45,46,47],2022,2023,2024,2025,2026,{"member_id":49,"name":50,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":51,"top_topics":52,"summary":53,"evidence":54,"fields":55,"field_years":74},482,"北岡あや子",692,[],"区民生活の各領域にわたる具体的な施策実行状況の確認と改善提案が発言記録に多く残されている。子育て支援、高齢者福祉、防災、環境対策など幅広い分野で「現状の詳細な説明を求める」「今後の取組予定を確認する」「対象外の事例への対応を検討するよう促す」といった質疑パターンが顕著である。",[],{"kankyo":56,"keizai":57,"jinken":58,"kenko":59,"machi":63,"kosodate":64,"bousai":69,"fukushi":71,"gyosei":72,"sumai":73},[16,37,36,23,24],[16,21,36,40,18],[16,17,28,28,16],[16,60,61,62,33],14,38,17,[16,20,23,9,17],[16,65,66,67,68],22,39,32,23,[16,70,67,24,33],18,[16,33,62,62,33],[16,29,20,20,17],[16,29,29,29,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":76,"name":77,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":78,"top_topics":79,"summary":80,"evidence":81,"fields":82,"field_years":101},486,"島村高彦",975,[],"委員会運営や議案審議を司る議会運営に関わる発言が中心で、制度設計の詳細な検証や事業実績の因果関係の把握を求める質問が記録されている。区民サービス向上に向けた具体的な問題指摘と、政策立案過程における住民・利用者の声の反映方法を懸念する傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"sumai":83,"keizai":86,"kenko":87,"fukushi":89,"kosodate":91,"gyosei":94,"machi":96,"kankyo":97,"bousai":99},[16,84,17,85,16],8,26,[16,21,21,67,16],[16,33,30,88,16],35,[16,21,70,90,16],48,[16,28,92,93,16],40,50,[16,33,95,20,16],44,[16,21,84,25,16],[16,29,21,98,16],31,[16,36,39,100,16],81,[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":103,"name":104,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":105,"top_topics":106,"summary":107,"evidence":108,"fields":109,"field_years":125},480,"根岸光洋",1217,[],"委員会運営・議事進行の役割を多く担当し、予算・決算審査では施設工事、福祉施策、住宅政策など多分野にわたり詳細な質疑を実施。金額根拠、工程スケジュール、制度設計の細部について確認する傾向が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":110,"kosodate":112,"machi":115,"bousai":116,"kenko":117,"sumai":119,"gyosei":120,"kankyo":122,"keizai":123,"jinken":124},[16,111,65,40,18],20,[16,113,114,65,36],36,54,[16,39,61,95,23],[16,21,20,62,30],[16,65,118,60,16],28,[16,84,9,28,28],[16,121,39,21,16],52,[16,33,118,40,21],[16,28,30,30,28],[16,16,26,18,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":127,"name":128,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":129,"top_topics":130,"summary":131,"evidence":132,"fields":133,"field_years":144},483,"西山陽介",1076,[],"委員会審査で詳細な確認質問を重ねる発言が多く記録されている。施策の根拠、事業の妥当性、数字の算出根拠、制度の実装方法など、具体的な内容を丁寧に聞き取ろうとするスタンスが表れている。また、地域課題や弱者支援、多様性尊重といった福祉的な論点を扱う際には、制度の実運用や職員配置の工夫にまで言及する発言が記録されている。",[],{"jinken":134,"kosodate":135,"bousai":136,"kenko":137,"machi":138,"fukushi":139,"sumai":140,"kankyo":141,"gyosei":142,"keizai":143},[16,33,21,29,17],[16,37,25,113,111],[16,28,70,68,62],[16,40,28,17,84],[16,26,70,66,24],[16,9,30,21,21],[16,29,33,18,37],[16,33,28,9,40],[16,24,33,20,16],[16,26,36,26,28],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":146,"name":147,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":148,"top_topics":149,"summary":150,"evidence":151,"fields":152,"field_years":171},484,"辻薫",899,[],"委員会での質疑で、施設整備・福祉・教育・防災など多分野にわたり、事業の詳細確認と今後の計画・対応方針を問う発言が記録されている。質問では現状把握、スケジュール確認、他自治体との比較検討、補正予算での対応可能性など、実装段階での具体的課題解決を志向する傾向が見られる。",[],{"kankyo":153,"machi":155,"sumai":158,"kosodate":159,"kenko":161,"gyosei":163,"bousai":165,"keizai":167,"fukushi":168,"jinken":170},[16,154,118,16,29],25,[16,156,157,28,16],51,59,[16,40,70,16,16],[16,98,160,33,16],66,[16,65,162,40,16],55,[16,164,23,17,16],37,[16,166,95,16,16],33,[16,65,39,18,16],[16,68,169,33,16],30,[16,17,20,16,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":173,"name":174,"party":7,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":175,"top_topics":176,"summary":177,"evidence":178,"fields":179,"field_years":194},485,"高橋佳代子",1505,[],"委員会運営や議案審査の場で、施策の具体的な実施方法・周知方法・課題解決策について詳細な確認質問を重ねる発言が多く記録されている。社会保障制度改正や子ども・高齢者支援、インフラ整備など多分野の議題で、区民への浸透度や現場との連携可能性を指摘する傾向が見られる。",[],{"kankyo":180,"bousai":181,"machi":182,"keizai":183,"fukushi":184,"kenko":185,"sumai":187,"kosodate":188,"gyosei":192,"jinken":193},[16,111,18,37,84],[16,92,92,60,17],[16,166,20,164,30],[16,20,28,70,26],[16,169,65,68,21],[16,186,39,70,84],47,[16,37,28,84,17],[16,189,190,191,30],65,24,45,[16,67,28,68,84],[16,29,18,16,18],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":196,"name":197,"party":198,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":199,"top_topics":200,"summary":201,"evidence":202,"fields":203,"field_years":218},507,"儀武さとる","日本共産党豊島区議団",1169,[],"福祉・社会保障、環境・公共施設、行政運営の詳細な数字・制度設計に関する質問が記録されている。予算の根拠、対象者規模、制度改正の影響範囲を具体的に確認する発言パターンが目立つ。",[],{"machi":204,"kankyo":207,"bousai":208,"keizai":209,"sumai":210,"fukushi":211,"kenko":213,"kosodate":214,"gyosei":216,"jinken":217},[16,205,206,205,18],29,46,[16,169,190,111,17],[16,37,70,24,26],[16,9,206,169,21],[16,40,85,17,16],[16,92,212,164,18],73,[16,118,164,24,21],[16,111,206,215,70],57,[16,111,215,39,17],[16,21,40,24,18],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":220,"name":221,"party":198,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":222,"top_topics":223,"summary":224,"evidence":225,"fields":226,"field_years":243},508,"垣内信行",986,[],"区政の個別具体的な制度設計・数値根拠を追及する発言が多く、再開発事業・住宅施策・防災計画など複数分野にわたり、区側の説明の不透明性や根拠の曖昧さを問い直す質疑が記録されている。また弱者救済や住民負担軽減の必要性を指摘し、制度の実効性検証や比較検討を求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"kankyo":227,"sumai":228,"bousai":231,"machi":232,"gyosei":234,"kosodate":236,"keizai":237,"kenko":239,"fukushi":240,"jinken":242},[16,23,33,36,17],[16,111,229,230,60],94,43,[16,70,98,67,17],[16,90,160,233,37],49,[16,84,235,98,29],42,[16,70,156,111,21],[16,30,238,61,29],34,[16,26,190,33,29],[16,84,241,157,30],69,[16,16,18,18,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":245,"name":246,"party":198,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":247,"top_topics":248,"summary":249,"evidence":250,"fields":251,"field_years":266},505,"小林ひろみ",1418,[],"区民生活の細部に関わる施設・制度・予算について多数の質疑を記録している。福祉・教育・都市計画など広範な分野で具体的な数字や実績を確認する姿勢が見られ、特に職員配置・給与体系・指定管理者制度・物価対策給付金の対象者判定など、行政の運用実態に関する質問が多く記録されている。",[],{"sumai":252,"machi":253,"bousai":255,"fukushi":256,"kankyo":259,"keizai":260,"kenko":261,"kosodate":262,"gyosei":264,"jinken":265},[16,67,68,23,33],[16,190,66,254,36],74,[16,25,36,37,29],[16,257,212,258,36],67,70,[16,111,24,30,29],[16,66,238,65,28],[16,90,95,206,16],[16,263,233,156,39],86,[16,160,113,238,21],[16,36,33,17,29],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":268,"name":269,"party":198,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":270,"top_topics":271,"summary":272,"evidence":273,"fields":274,"field_years":287},506,"森とおる",1170,[],"委員会での質疑では、行政施策の詳細な説明や裏付け資料の提示を繰り返し求める発言が記録されている。また、社会保障制度の運用や労働環境・待遇に関して、具体的な懸念や改善提案を述べる発言が目立つ。議案・陳情の採択判断では、生活保護・介護保険・障害者福祉など生活困窮層への支援拡充や労働条件改善を求める立場が記録されている。",[],{"kankyo":275,"gyosei":276,"machi":277,"kosodate":278,"fukushi":279,"kenko":281,"keizai":283,"bousai":284,"sumai":285,"jinken":286},[16,26,28,33,16],[16,65,166,190,36],[16,164,61,95,68],[16,111,85,23,84],[16,62,280,65,28],61,[16,154,282,65,16],41,[16,33,68,67,21],[16,33,20,23,84],[16,17,9,23,26],[16,29,21,18,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":289,"name":290,"party":291,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":292,"top_topics":293,"summary":294,"evidence":295,"fields":296,"field_years":307},509,"塚田ひさこ","立憲・れいわ・市民の会",850,[],"区の施策や事業について細部の仕組みや根拠を質問する傾向が記録されている。区民負担・事務負担・制度の合理性に関心を寄せ、国の制度設計に対する違和感を表明しながらも、困窮する区民への支援を重視して議案に賛成する立場が見られる。",[],{"sumai":297,"kankyo":298,"fukushi":299,"keizai":300,"kosodate":301,"gyosei":302,"kenko":303,"bousai":304,"machi":305,"jinken":306},[16,17,18,238,17],[16,21,33,84,29],[16,70,164,190,16],[16,84,238,85,21],[16,21,190,230,29],[16,169,85,62,21],[16,20,62,85,18],[16,17,21,85,18],[16,18,166,90,84],[16,16,33,111,17],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":309,"name":310,"party":291,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":311,"top_topics":312,"summary":313,"evidence":314,"fields":315,"field_years":327},510,"川瀬さなえ",647,[],"福祉・子育て・環境など複数分野で詳細な質問を記録されている。行政施策の実施状況や対象者への周知、制度の実効性確認に関する質問が多く、現場の実態把握と行政支援の充実を求める発言が記録されている。",[],{"kosodate":316,"machi":318,"kankyo":319,"sumai":320,"bousai":321,"kenko":322,"fukushi":323,"keizai":324,"gyosei":325,"jinken":326},[16,235,317,154,36],60,[16,98,111,85,28],[16,39,9,111,40],[16,60,40,84,37],[16,21,28,17,29],[16,70,21,36,29],[16,70,23,68,30],[16,24,37,9,84],[16,84,17,40,17],[16,28,29,84,29],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":329,"name":330,"party":291,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":331,"top_topics":332,"summary":333,"evidence":334,"fields":335,"field_years":346},511,"西崎ふうか",456,[],"細部の仕組みや数字の根拠を確認する質問が多く記録されている。予算額の内訳、業務委託の選定方法、統計データの取得方法など、施策の実装段階での具体的な疑問を繰り返し提起する傾向が見られる。また、区民や利用者のニーズが実際に反映されているか、透明性が確保されているかという観点から、行政の説明責任を問う質疑が記録されている。",[],{"sumai":336,"kenko":337,"fukushi":338,"machi":339,"bousai":340,"kosodate":341,"keizai":342,"gyosei":343,"kankyo":344,"jinken":345},[16,17,62,16,16],[16,29,37,37,29],[16,18,30,33,29],[16,9,113,67,17],[16,84,60,65,16],[16,26,67,186,70],[16,16,36,24,18],[16,16,21,33,16],[16,16,18,62,29],[16,16,28,70,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":348,"name":349,"party":350,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":351,"top_topics":352,"summary":353,"evidence":354,"fields":355,"field_years":366},513,"さくま一生","立憲民主党",854,[],"福祉・環境・まちづくりの細部に関する質問が頻出し、現場の職員負担や利用者の実態把握を重視する発言が多い。また、地域住民の参加と協働、デジタル化導入時の周知・格差是正といった課題について、具体例を交えた問題提起が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":356,"kosodate":357,"kenko":358,"gyosei":359,"machi":360,"keizai":361,"sumai":362,"kankyo":363,"bousai":364,"jinken":365},[16,98,118,154,29],[16,61,37,62,40],[16,205,68,85,16],[16,20,190,39,16],[16,230,118,65,28],[16,20,40,62,17],[16,36,60,84,16],[16,154,36,40,17],[16,20,84,21,28],[16,24,17,33,29],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":368,"name":369,"party":370,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":371,"top_topics":372,"summary":373,"evidence":374,"fields":375,"field_years":386},502,"ふるぼう知生","維新・無所属の会",561,[],"施設整備・行政運営・財政配分など広範な議題で詳細な質疑を行う傾向が記録されている。質問では現状把握や数値根拠を求め、制度設計における根拠や他自治体との比較検討を指摘する発言が多い。議案採決では理由を付けて賛否を明確にし、施策の課題や改善提案を併せて述べる傾向にある。",[],{"kosodate":376,"machi":377,"kankyo":378,"bousai":379,"kenko":380,"gyosei":381,"keizai":382,"fukushi":383,"sumai":384,"jinken":385},[16,39,154,37,29],[16,40,68,154,21],[16,36,18,30,16],[16,30,40,85,18],[16,33,70,84,16],[16,9,68,20,18],[16,21,37,33,29],[16,33,60,84,29],[16,29,17,84,29],[16,16,17,17,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":388,"name":389,"party":370,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":390,"top_topics":391,"summary":392,"evidence":393,"fields":394,"field_years":405},501,"入江あゆみ",374,[],"区民サービスの具体的な改善と利用者負担軽減に関する質問が多数記録されている。デジタルツール導入時の操作方法や手続簡素化、周知・広報の工夫、既存事業の継続性や実績検証を求める発言が特徴的である。また、社会的弱者や情報弱者への配慮、障害者を含む多様なニーズへの対応可能性を問う姿勢が見られる。",[],{"bousai":395,"kosodate":396,"kenko":397,"keizai":398,"jinken":399,"machi":400,"sumai":401,"kankyo":402,"gyosei":403,"fukushi":404},[16,9,111,29,16],[16,61,70,190,60],[16,60,84,84,16],[16,24,9,24,21],[16,17,17,29,16],[16,62,30,21,18],[16,18,21,29,16],[16,84,24,84,33],[16,26,17,33,16],[16,28,40,28,29],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":407,"name":408,"party":370,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":409,"top_topics":410,"summary":411,"evidence":412,"fields":413,"field_years":424},504,"林二葉",828,[],"施策や事業の具体的な実施状況・数値・背景について質問を重ねる発言が記録されている。福祉・防災・都市整備など多分野にわたり、区民向けの情報提供や利用者視点での制度設計の改善を指摘する発言が多い。",[],{"sumai":414,"kankyo":415,"keizai":416,"fukushi":417,"kosodate":418,"bousai":419,"machi":420,"gyosei":421,"kenko":422,"jinken":423},[16,29,17,30,18],[16,24,84,39,30],[16,17,37,37,26],[16,21,40,33,17],[16,20,67,61,205],[16,60,166,9,24],[16,190,88,70,111],[16,24,111,111,18],[16,62,62,23,21],[16,17,36,33,29],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":426,"name":427,"party":370,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":428,"top_topics":429,"summary":430,"evidence":431,"fields":432,"field_years":443},503,"泉谷つよし",383,[],"介護・高齢者福祉、都市計画・マンション、ごみ・環境、スポーツ施設などの行政課題について、現場への実地調査や具体的統計数字に基づく質問が多く記録されている。施策の費用対効果や実行率の検証、事業者・利用者への聞き取りを通じた問題指摘が特徴的。市場原理の活用や行政効率化に言及する発言も見られる。",[],{"fukushi":433,"kenko":434,"jinken":435,"sumai":436,"keizai":437,"machi":438,"kankyo":439,"kosodate":440,"bousai":441,"gyosei":442},[16,33,98,90,21],[16,18,37,33,16],[16,29,17,24,16],[16,18,20,37,18],[16,29,30,9,17],[16,18,26,24,29],[16,16,70,20,29],[16,21,190,60,18],[16,29,33,21,18],[16,16,33,30,17],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":445,"name":446,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":448,"top_topics":449,"summary":450,"evidence":451,"fields":452,"field_years":463},495,"井上幸一","自由民主党豊島区議団",358,[],"地元・豊島区池袋本町地区の具体的な課題（再開発、防災整備、道路事業、コミュニティ維持）について詳細な質問を重ねる傾向が記録されており、区民・地域との接点を通じた行政への提案や確認が多く見られる。同時に、防災・耐震化、ごみ処理、外国人対応など広範な行政課題についても建設的な質問を行っている。",[],{"machi":453,"kankyo":454,"kosodate":455,"jinken":456,"fukushi":457,"kenko":458,"bousai":459,"gyosei":460,"sumai":461,"keizai":462},[16,18,205,68,29],[16,29,40,23,16],[16,16,88,111,29],[16,29,30,21,16],[16,29,36,17,16],[16,16,68,28,16],[16,16,164,118,28],[16,16,30,18,16],[16,16,20,17,16],[16,16,33,16,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":465,"name":466,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":467,"top_topics":468,"summary":469,"evidence":470,"fields":471,"field_years":482},496,"有里真穂",365,[],"地方議会のインフラ整備、子育て支援、健康・福祉政策など多岐にわたる行政課題について、現状把握と具体的な実装方法を追及する質問が記録されている。施設整備では将来を見据えた設計や地域との協議を重視し、情報発信では紙とデジタルの併用やLINE・SNS活用を繰り返し提案している。",[],{"fukushi":472,"kankyo":473,"kosodate":474,"jinken":475,"sumai":476,"gyosei":477,"machi":478,"bousai":479,"kenko":480,"keizai":481},[16,21,17,70,28],[16,40,26,29,28],[16,33,169,67,23],[16,17,18,16,29],[16,18,16,16,33],[16,21,18,23,28],[16,17,40,40,20],[16,16,39,26,37],[16,16,62,113,18],[16,16,29,26,21],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":484,"name":485,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":486,"top_topics":487,"summary":488,"evidence":489,"fields":490,"field_years":501},498,"松下創一郎",491,[],"区政の様々な分野において、政策効果や制度設計の詳細を質問する発言が記録されている。特に、施策の実装段階での実務的課題や、複数自治体の比較による先進事例の検討を求める傾向が見られる。また、財政的な持続可能性とのバランスを意識した議論を重視する姿勢が多く記録されている。",[],{"sumai":491,"kenko":492,"gyosei":493,"bousai":494,"keizai":495,"kankyo":496,"fukushi":497,"machi":498,"jinken":499,"kosodate":500},[16,40,21,30,24],[16,88,37,21,18],[16,164,20,37,28],[16,37,30,33,16],[16,21,62,37,17],[16,17,20,37,40],[16,40,9,28,21],[16,23,62,20,21],[16,30,37,40,17],[16,60,23,33,68],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":503,"name":504,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":505,"top_topics":506,"summary":507,"evidence":508,"fields":509,"field_years":520},499,"磯一昭",1103,[],"委員会の議長・委員長としての進行・議事運営に関する発言が大半を占めている。提案審査・採決・日程調整・会派への周知など、委員会運営の手続的事項に関する発言が記録されている。また、個別議案の質疑では、数値の矛盾指摘、防災訓練の実施状況確認、給食費負担に関する個人的見解など、具体的な事実確認や政策への疑問を発する発言が見られる。",[],{"gyosei":510,"kenko":511,"machi":512,"kankyo":513,"keizai":514,"kosodate":515,"fukushi":516,"jinken":517,"bousai":518,"sumai":519},[16,16,9,67,16],[16,28,33,205,16],[16,65,205,39,16],[16,29,17,24,16],[16,33,18,37,16],[16,40,67,164,16],[16,21,40,238,16],[16,29,28,29,16],[16,39,24,84,16],[16,18,17,21,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":522,"name":523,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":524,"top_topics":525,"summary":526,"evidence":527,"fields":528,"field_years":539},500,"竹下ひろみ",814,[],"公共工事の入札・契約や施設整備事業の詳細について質問を重ね、予定価格の設定方法や落札率の高さ、業者選定の課題に関心を示している。同時に、予算編成や社会保障関連の施策についても質問を行い、区の実行方針を確認する発言が記録されている。",[],{"fukushi":529,"keizai":530,"machi":531,"kosodate":532,"kenko":533,"kankyo":534,"bousai":535,"sumai":536,"gyosei":537,"jinken":538},[16,9,23,85,29],[16,25,164,230,33],[16,85,230,230,20],[16,92,282,92,18],[16,111,37,23,16],[16,26,40,37,28],[16,9,85,98,33],[16,21,84,30,29],[16,111,92,235,36],[16,17,28,29,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":541,"name":542,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":543,"top_topics":544,"summary":545,"evidence":546,"fields":547,"field_years":558},494,"芳賀竜朗",1728,[],"防災・危機管理と公共施設の運営管理に関する質疑が記録に多く見られる。区民の自助努力を強調する防災観や、既存施設の具体的な運用課題（人員配置、設備更新、利便性改善）について詳細な質問をする傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"gyosei":548,"fukushi":549,"keizai":550,"bousai":551,"kosodate":552,"kankyo":553,"machi":554,"jinken":555,"kenko":556,"sumai":557},[16,85,40,26,16],[16,21,40,18,16],[16,118,21,40,16],[16,66,36,62,16],[16,282,205,111,29],[16,39,30,84,29],[16,162,39,113,30],[16,9,17,16,16],[16,67,30,28,16],[16,26,17,26,28],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":560,"name":561,"party":447,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":562,"top_topics":563,"summary":564,"evidence":565,"fields":566,"field_years":577},497,"藤澤愛子",1302,[],"委員会の進行・議事の統括を務める傍ら、児童虐待対応や保育・福祉施設の安全管理、マイナ保険証導入など福祉・衛生関連の施策について、支援内容や対応手法の詳細な説明を求める質疑が記録されている。事業者や行政の取り組みの実効性を確認しつつ、潜在的なリスクや運用上の留意点を指摘する傾向が読み取れる。",[],{"kosodate":567,"gyosei":568,"fukushi":569,"machi":570,"kankyo":571,"jinken":572,"bousai":573,"kenko":574,"keizai":575,"sumai":576},[16,238,88,60,16],[16,37,111,84,16],[16,60,68,60,16],[16,61,24,18,16],[16,36,33,26,16],[16,17,28,28,16],[16,9,18,17,16],[16,118,60,30,16],[16,40,39,21,16],[16,84,18,29,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":579,"name":580,"party":581,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":582,"top_topics":583,"summary":584,"evidence":585,"fields":586,"field_years":597},512,"小林弘明","豊島区無所属元気の会",571,[],"行政課題の現状把握と詳細な改善案を組み合わせた質問が多く記録されている。防災・公共交通・福祉・経済活性化など幅広い分野で、他自治体との比較やデータに基づく具体的な提案と並行して、実装可能性の検証を求める発言が目立つ。",[],{"keizai":587,"sumai":588,"bousai":589,"kosodate":590,"gyosei":591,"machi":592,"kenko":593,"jinken":594,"fukushi":595,"kankyo":596},[16,66,118,24,17],[16,30,18,84,16],[16,118,92,154,33],[16,85,166,190,154],[16,39,154,36,60],[16,39,20,67,37],[16,169,70,21,33],[16,17,26,36,29],[16,60,111,20,18],[16,33,37,36,17],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":599,"name":600,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":602,"top_topics":603,"summary":604,"evidence":605,"fields":606,"field_years":617},488,"中山よしと","都民ファーストの会豊島区議団・国民民主党",739,[],"予算・決算審議における詳細な質疑が大部分を占める。事業費の積算根拠、補正予算の理由、制度設計の細部に関する質問が多く、行政側の説明内容を段階的に確認しながら理解を深める手法が記録されている。また、制度運用時の現場負担や実装上の課題についても言及が見られる。",[],{"fukushi":607,"jinken":608,"kosodate":609,"keizai":610,"gyosei":611,"kenko":612,"bousai":613,"machi":614,"kankyo":615,"sumai":616},[16,60,60,24,16],[16,17,29,29,16],[16,111,190,98,28],[16,29,36,37,28],[16,154,20,66,29],[16,36,9,36,16],[16,33,30,36,29],[16,17,36,62,26],[16,29,28,24,16],[16,29,24,17,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":619,"name":620,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":621,"top_topics":622,"summary":623,"evidence":624,"fields":625,"field_years":636},487,"中澤まさゆき",788,[],"施設改修・交通・防災など多岐の行政事業を対象に、工事の進捗管理・実施方法・地域との協調体制について確認・質問する発言が記録されている。また予算補正や施策の効果測定の根拠について詳細な説明を求める傾向が見られる。",[],{"gyosei":626,"kenko":627,"fukushi":628,"machi":629,"keizai":630,"kankyo":631,"bousai":632,"kosodate":633,"sumai":634,"jinken":635},[16,17,40,21,16],[16,28,26,16,16],[16,29,26,28,18],[16,33,154,60,16],[16,29,36,70,16],[16,84,190,111,16],[16,36,39,65,29],[16,17,37,95,37],[16,29,26,28,16],[16,29,18,18,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":638,"name":639,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":640,"top_topics":641,"summary":642,"evidence":643,"fields":644,"field_years":655},489,"原田たかき",569,[],"条例・規則の文言や数字の細部に着目し、技術的な正確性や矛盾点を指摘する質問が記録の大部分を占めている。また、施策の実績値・目標値の根拠、補助金の効果測定、制度利用の周知方法など、行政施策の「実装と運用の詳細」を問う発言が多く記されている。さらに外国人住民・多文化共生、自転車駐車場、防災など特定の地域課題に繰り返し言及する傾向が見られる。",[],{"gyosei":645,"kenko":646,"fukushi":647,"keizai":648,"kosodate":649,"bousai":650,"jinken":651,"machi":652,"sumai":653,"kankyo":654},[16,40,62,111,17],[16,37,40,33,16],[16,26,20,70,16],[16,25,9,36,70],[16,20,85,154,17],[16,21,37,62,17],[16,36,21,111,16],[16,21,36,68,84],[16,84,40,21,16],[16,33,24,17,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":486,"name":657,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":658,"top_topics":659,"summary":660,"evidence":661,"fields":662,"field_years":673},"宮崎けい子",441,[],"施設運営や行政サービスの実装段階での具体的な課題に関する質問が多く記録されている。予算の妥当性確認のほか、利用者視点での細部設計（段差・動線・プライバシー配慮など）や事業の実績と目的の整合性、職員体制の実行可能性といった実務的な検証に記録が集中している。また、制度設計の透明性や効果測定、対象者への周知方法の工夫といった、政策実行のプロセス改善に関する指摘も多い。",[],{"machi":663,"bousai":664,"fukushi":665,"kenko":666,"sumai":667,"kosodate":668,"keizai":669,"kankyo":670,"gyosei":671,"jinken":672},[16,17,85,39,29],[16,29,30,21,16],[16,18,84,84,28],[16,16,84,33,21],[16,16,24,28,16],[16,33,166,186,37],[16,17,21,33,18],[16,16,26,26,16],[16,16,28,190,29],[16,16,18,17,16],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":675,"name":676,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":677,"top_topics":678,"summary":679,"evidence":680,"fields":681,"field_years":693},493,"星京子",1054,[],"委員会運営や福祉・環境・都市計画など多岐にわたる行政課題について、住民ニーズの把握に基づく質疑を重ねる発言が多く記録されている。特に高齢者・女性・子ども・地域住民など具体的な生活課題を取り上げ、既存施策の課題確認と今後の検討を求める質問パターンが顕著である。",[],{"bousai":682,"kankyo":683,"sumai":684,"machi":685,"gyosei":686,"keizai":687,"kosodate":688,"fukushi":690,"kenko":691,"jinken":692},[16,40,24,20,21],[16,20,84,28,17],[16,33,26,29,16],[16,66,154,20,40],[16,166,30,186,29],[16,118,62,21,33],[16,689,25,62,16],53,[16,169,98,111,30],[16,238,84,62,16],[16,24,18,16,18],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":695,"name":696,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":697,"top_topics":698,"summary":699,"evidence":700,"fields":701,"field_years":713},490,"片岡きょうこ",767,[],"行政の実務的な詳細を詳しく確認する質疑が多く記録されている。施設整備・福祉制度・財政・教育など広範な分野で、事業の具体的な内容・根拠・スケジュール・費用積算について段階的に質問する傾向が見られる。また、地域課題や利用者負担に関する懸念を提示し、代替案や改善の可能性について行政側に問い詰める発言が多い。",[],{"fukushi":702,"kosodate":703,"kenko":705,"gyosei":706,"jinken":707,"keizai":708,"kankyo":709,"machi":710,"bousai":711,"sumai":712},[16,40,98,39,18],[16,40,704,189,18],84,[16,62,169,62,29],[16,36,111,282,26],[16,21,33,111,29],[16,28,70,85,17],[16,18,85,235,84],[16,26,169,206,33],[16,18,68,67,17],[16,18,84,70,17],[43,44,45,46,47],{"member_id":715,"name":716,"party":601,"photo_url":8,"terms":8,"elected_at":8,"assembly_id":9,"role":8,"profile_url":8,"speech_count":717,"top_topics":718,"summary":719,"evidence":720,"fields":721,"field_years":733},492,"細川正博",1450,[],"委員会審議で詳細な質問を重ねる傾向が記録されている。制度設計の矛盾点や事務的な課題を指摘し、政策立案側に説明責任を求める質疑が多く、特に複雑な制度や契約変更案件では複数回にわたる追加質問を行っている。また、区の事務負担や制度の実効性を考慮した意見も提示される。",[],{"sumai":722,"fukushi":723,"kosodate":724,"keizai":726,"machi":727,"bousai":728,"kankyo":729,"gyosei":730,"kenko":731,"jinken":732},[16,9,17,17,26],[16,60,70,30,16],[16,241,725,164,16],91,[16,169,62,28,18],[16,98,233,92,28],[16,68,20,36,16],[16,190,85,24,16],[16,88,23,68,18],[16,68,282,9,16],[16,18,29,84,29],[43,44,45,46,47],1789179104145]